Population 6,434 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Amphi: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Amphi
Household size in Amphi
| Period | Amphi | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.19 | 2.57 | 2.77 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.42 | 2.61 | 2.84 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.29 | 2.56 | 2.82 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.02 | 2.48 | 2.70 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.17 | −0.09 | −0.07 | −0.03 |
Households in Amphi are small: just 2.02 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.19, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Amphi
| Period | Amphi | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 31.2 | 38.9 | 36.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 28.3 | 39.5 | 38.1 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 32.1 | 40.5 | 39.5 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 36.1 | 41.7 | 40.4 | 40.1 |
| Change | +4.8 | +2.7 | +3.5 | +2.3 |
Amphi is young: half of its residents are under 36.1, compared with a national median of 40.1. The population tilts toward young adults, many of them living alone or as couples. The median age has climbed from 31.2 in 2006–10, mirroring the country.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Amphi
| Period | Amphi | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.5% | 12.2% | 13.4% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 22.0% | 12.7% | 13.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 18.0% | 12.3% | 12.7% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 12.5% | 11.3% | 12.6% | 11.6% |
| Change | −0.0 pts | −0.9 pts | −0.8 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head about one in eight households in Amphi (12.5%), close to the national share of 11.6%. Single parents are more common here than in the wider Tucson area (11.3%).
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Amphi
Renters in Amphi
| Period | Amphi | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 73.0% | 35.4% | 32.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 81.7% | 38.5% | 36.6% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 77.1% | 37.0% | 35.6% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 79.5% | 34.8% | 32.6% | 34.8% |
| Change | +6.4 pts | −0.7 pts | +0.1 pts | +1.5 pts |
Renters far outnumber owners in Amphi: 79.5% of households rent their homes, against 34.8% nationally. Among homeowners, 33.0% have no mortgage at all, below the national share of 39.8%. Renting is most common in the west and least common in the north. The renter share has risen 6.4 points since 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Amphi
| Period | Amphi | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 16.2% | 12.4% | 15.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 22.9% | 13.0% | 15.3% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 14.8% | 11.5% | 12.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 11.1% | 9.1% | 9.6% | 9.6% |
| Change | −5.1 pts | −3.2 pts | −5.6 pts | −1.8 pts |
About as many homes sit empty in Amphi as nationally: 11.1%, against 9.6%. The rate is higher than in the Tucson area overall (9.1%). Vacancy has fallen 5.1 points since 2006–10, in line with the national trend.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Amphi
| Period | Amphi | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1977 | 1983 | 1987 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1980 | 1984 | 1988 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1980 | 1984 | 1989 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1979 | 1987 | 1992 | 1980 |
| Change | +2 | +4 | +5 | +6 |
The typical home in Amphi was built around 1979, about the same vintage as the country's housing overall (1980). Homes here are older than in the wider Tucson area, where the median home dates to 1987.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Amphi
| Period | Amphi | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $593 | $960 | $1,043 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $643 | $991 | $1,078 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $706 | $1,089 | $1,227 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,028 | $1,479 | $1,736 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$435 | +$519 | +$694 | +$606 |
The median renter in Amphi pays $1,028 a month for rent and utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rents are up $435 a month from 2006–10, a 73% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. Rent takes 33.1% of the typical renter's income, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. Renters on a budget will find the lowest rents in the south; the highest are in the north.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Amphi
Bachelor's degrees in Amphi
| Period | Amphi | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.9% | 29.4% | 26.3% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 15.0% | 29.4% | 27.0% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 14.0% | 32.0% | 29.3% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 25.7% | 36.4% | 33.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +15.8 pts | +7.0 pts | +7.0 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are less common in Amphi than nationally: 25.7% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%. The share with a degree is up 15.8 points from 2006–10, in line with the national trend. College graduates are most concentrated in the center and least in the south.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Amphi
| Period | Amphi | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 70.1% | 86.7% | 84.6% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 73.9% | 86.9% | 85.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 74.7% | 87.9% | 86.8% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 84.2% | 90.3% | 89.1% | 89.3% |
| Change | +14.2 pts | +3.6 pts | +4.5 pts | +4.3 pts |
Nearly one in six adults in Amphi never finished high school, well above the national share: only 84.2% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally. The share with a diploma has risen 14.2 points since 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Amphi
| Period | Amphi | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.8% | 8.0% | 7.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 19.1% | 10.8% | 10.2% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 6.0% | 7.0% | 6.0% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 6.7% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Change | −3.1 pts | −2.7 pts | −2.5 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment runs a little high in Amphi: 6.7% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4% nationally. Unemployment is down 3.1 points from 2006–10, as it has nationally. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Amphi compared with nearby neighborhoods
| Neighborhood | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amphi | 2.02 | 36.1 | 12.5% | 79.5% | 11.1% | 1979 | $1,028 | 25.7% | 84.2% | 6.7% |
| Limberlost | 1.94 | 31.3 | 18.9% | 77.5% | 12.7% | 1982 | $1,104 | 32.5% | 94.6% | 3.4% |
| Campus Farm | 2.18 | 30.3 | 12.0% | 61.9% | 8.7% | 1983 | $1,373 | 34.0% | 91.3% | 9.6% |
| Keeling | 2.00 | 33.3 | 15.2% | 74.3% | 8.4% | 1970 | $1,028 | 30.2% | 80.9% | 6.7% |
| Hedrick Acres | 1.90 | 31.4 | 13.0% | 73.2% | 10.4% | 1979 | $1,209 | 38.1% | 89.9% | 6.2% |
| Prince Tucson | 1.78 | 43.4 | 4.3% | 68.4% | 11.6% | 1979 | $1,191 | 45.2% | 98.8% | 7.1% |
| North University | 2.16 | 22.8 | 13.9% | 83.3% | 12.1% | 1971 | $1,224 | 45.5% | 92.5% | 7.4% |
| West University | 2.26 | 21.2 | 8.8% | 85.8% | 9.8% | 1977 | $1,228 | 46.0% | 95.4% | 5.3% |
| Catalina Foothills Estates | 2.08 | 58.2 | 3.9% | 15.3% | 12.8% | 1984 | $1,398 | 76.1% | 99.3% | 4.1% |
| Rincon Heights | 1.95 | 21.5 | 4.2% | 85.3% | 6.7% | 1967 | $1,151 | 45.9% | 65.9% | 8.6% |
| Blenman-Elm | 1.91 | 39.5 | 8.5% | 58.7% | 12.1% | 1957 | $1,149 | 50.8% | 94.1% | 6.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Neighborhoods with similar populations: Country Squire Estates, West Valley City, UT · Westside, Binghamton, NY · West Waco, Woodway, TX · Natomas Corporate Center, Sacramento, CA · Hutton Park, West Orange, NJ · Annex, East Haven, CT · Overlook, Summit, NJ · Northwest, Garden City, ID · Southern Hills, Springfield, MO · North Main, Greenville, SC
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Amphi. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.