Population 398 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Foot of Ten: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Foot of Ten
Household size in Foot of Ten
| Period | Foot of Ten | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.50 | 2.51 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.35 | 2.53 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.45 | 2.50 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.18 | 2.46 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.32 | −0.05 | −0.03 |
Households in Foot of Ten are small: just 2.18 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.50, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Foot of Ten
| Period | Foot of Ten | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 50.0 | 40.3 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 51.2 | 41.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 46.1 | 41.8 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 57.0 | 42.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +7.0 | +1.7 | +2.3 |
Foot of Ten skews older: half of its residents are older than 57.0, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Foot of Ten
| Period | Foot of Ten | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.5% | 10.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 4.7% | 10.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 17.5% | 10.5% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.6% | 10.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | −5.9 pts | +0.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Foot of Ten: 2.6% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Foot of Ten
Renters in Foot of Ten
| Period | Foot of Ten | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 13.2% | 29.0% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 8.6% | 30.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 17.2% | 31.1% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 14.4% | 30.7% | 34.8% |
| Change | +1.2 pts | +1.7 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 14.4% of households in Foot of Ten rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 57.4% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Foot of Ten
| Period | Foot of Ten | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.9% | 10.3% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 5.1% | 10.5% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 5.9% | 10.7% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 14.5% | 9.1% | 9.6% |
| Change | +9.6 pts | −1.2 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 14.5% of the housing in Foot of Ten, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Foot of Ten
| Period | Foot of Ten | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1964 | 1963 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1977 | 1964 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1974 | 1965 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1973 | 1967 | 1980 |
| Change | +9 | +4 | +6 |
Homes in Foot of Ten run older than the national norm, with a median build year of 1973 against 1980. Even so, homes here are newer than in Pennsylvania overall, where the median home dates to 1967.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Foot of Ten
| Period | Foot of Ten | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $543 | $829 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $645 | $923 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $564 | $1,039 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $520 | $1,323 | $1,571 |
| Change | −$22 | +$494 | +$606 |
Rent in Foot of Ten runs $520 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 22.5% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Foot of Ten
Bachelor's degrees in Foot of Ten
| Period | Foot of Ten | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 17.1% | 27.2% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 10.7% | 28.7% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 14.2% | 31.8% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 16.4% | 35.6% | 35.6% |
| Change | −0.7 pts | +8.3 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Foot of Ten have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 16.4%, against 35.6% nationally.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Foot of Ten
| Period | Foot of Ten | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 92.1% | 87.3% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 87.0% | 88.8% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 87.5% | 90.3% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 95.6% | 91.8% | 89.3% |
| Change | +3.5 pts | +4.5 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion is high in Foot of Ten: 95.6% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Foot of Ten
| Period | Foot of Ten | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.9% | 7.5% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 1.3% | 8.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.9% | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 10.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% |
| Change | +5.9 pts | −2.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Foot of Ten runs well above the national rate: 10.8% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Foot of Ten compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foot of Ten | 2.18 | 57.0 | 2.6% | 14.4% | 14.5% | 1973 | $520 | 16.4% | 95.6% | 10.8% |
| Duncansville | 2.25 | 50.0 | 8.2% | 23.7% | 7.3% | 1977 | $993 | 26.4% | 94.9% | 4.7% |
| Cross Keys | 1.84 | 61.9 | 3.2% | 23.2% | 7.1% | 1986 | $1,111 | 24.6% | 96.9% | 6.8% |
| Newry | 2.34 | 47.5 | 13.8% | 14.7% | 9.6% | 1962 | $804 | 17.5% | 91.1% | 1.4% |
| Tunnelhill | 2.48 | 44.0 | 7.8% | 12.5% | 11.7% | 1978 | $752 | 22.9% | 96.4% | 3.2% |
| Reservoir | 2.55 | 43.2 | 12.9% | 10.6% | 8.8% | 1965 | $856 | 22.8% | 93.5% | 0.8% |
| Hollidaysburg | 2.24 | 46.0 | 6.9% | 25.9% | 9.7% | 1970 | $1,102 | 39.1% | 96.0% | 1.5% |
| East Freedom | 2.12 | 54.4 | 6.3% | 18.1% | 4.9% | 1972 | $965 | 17.9% | 91.6% | 1.6% |
| Gallitzin | 2.43 | 41.6 | 8.8% | 16.9% | 11.1% | 1957 | $690 | 19.7% | 90.9% | 3.5% |
| Cresson | 2.15 | 43.7 | 7.2% | 30.8% | 9.4% | 1968 | $605 | 23.1% | 91.8% | 4.6% |
| Sankertown | 2.43 | 47.6 | 7.3% | 19.5% | 5.7% | 1958 | $708 | 14.3% | 95.5% | 6.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Hopeful, GA · Ingleside, NY · Indian Lake, PA · Hunters, WA · Humm Wye, IL · Hume, IL · Hubbard, MS · Hoytville, OH · Howlett Hill, NY · Howard, TX
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Foot of Ten. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.