Population 4,482 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Granville: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Granville
Household size in Granville
| Period | Granville | Prescott Valley | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.62 | 2.64 | 2.77 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.53 | 2.61 | 2.84 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.34 | 2.48 | 2.82 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.16 | 2.45 | 2.70 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.46 | −0.18 | −0.07 | −0.03 |
Granville is a place of small households, averaging 2.16 people against 2.65 for the U.S., which points to many singles, couples and roommates and relatively few children. Household size has dropped from 2.62 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Granville
| Period | Granville | Prescott Valley | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 32.9 | 39.7 | 36.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 32.2 | 40.7 | 38.1 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 49.3 | 46.2 | 39.5 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 60.6 | 49.9 | 40.4 | 40.1 |
| Change | +27.7 | +10.2 | +3.5 | +2.3 |
With a median age of 60.6, Granville is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Granville
| Period | Granville | Prescott Valley | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.7% | 10.2% | 13.4% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 20.0% | 11.5% | 13.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 13.0% | 9.6% | 12.7% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.8% | 10.0% | 12.6% | 11.6% |
| Change | −5.9 pts | −0.2 pts | −0.8 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 5.8% of households in Granville, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Granville
Renters in Granville
| Period | Granville | Prescott Valley | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 43.2% | 30.7% | 32.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 39.3% | 37.4% | 36.6% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 36.9% | 32.8% | 35.6% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 29.8% | 27.2% | 32.6% | 34.8% |
| Change | −13.5 pts | −3.5 pts | +0.1 pts | +1.5 pts |
About three in ten households in Granville rent their homes (29.8%), a little below the national share of 34.8%; the rest own. Prescott Valley as a whole looks much the same. More than a third of owners (36.6%) have paid off their mortgages, below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Granville
| Period | Granville | Prescott Valley | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 14.1% | 11.2% | 15.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 11.5% | 9.1% | 15.3% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 7.0% | 8.2% | 12.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 7.5% | 6.7% | 9.6% | 9.6% |
| Change | −6.7 pts | −4.5 pts | −5.6 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is on the low side in Granville: 7.5% of homes sit empty, against 9.6% nationally, which points to steady demand for housing. Prescott Valley as a whole looks much the same.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Granville
| Period | Granville | Prescott Valley | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2000 | 1995 | 1987 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 2000 | 1996 | 1988 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 2003 | 1997 | 1989 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 2013 | 2001 | 1992 | 1980 |
| Change | +13 | +6 | +5 | +6 |
Granville has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 2013, versus 1980 nationally.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Granville
| Period | Granville | Prescott Valley | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,018 | $991 | $1,043 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,044 | $988 | $1,078 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,059 | $1,158 | $1,227 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,932 | $1,757 | $1,736 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$914 | +$766 | +$694 | +$606 |
Rent in Granville runs $1,932 a month at the median, utilities included, well above the U.S. median of $1,571. Rent takes 37.1% of the typical renter's income, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Granville
Bachelor's degrees in Granville
| Period | Granville | Prescott Valley | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 24.1% | 17.0% | 26.3% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 26.2% | 18.3% | 27.0% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 27.6% | 20.2% | 29.3% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 30.9% | 25.9% | 33.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +6.7 pts | +8.9 pts | +7.0 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are a little less common in Granville than nationally: 30.9% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%. Locally, though, the share is higher than in Prescott Valley as a whole (25.9%).
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Granville
| Period | Granville | Prescott Valley | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 90.2% | 87.8% | 84.6% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 91.2% | 89.0% | 85.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 93.1% | 88.4% | 86.8% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 97.7% | 91.2% | 89.1% | 89.3% |
| Change | +7.5 pts | +3.4 pts | +4.5 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Granville: 97.7% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Granville
| Period | Granville | Prescott Valley | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.8% | 7.4% | 7.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 5.6% | 9.7% | 10.2% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 0.9% | 6.1% | 6.0% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.8% | 3.2% | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Change | −7.1 pts | −4.2 pts | −2.5 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Granville has been low: just 2.8% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Prescott Valley as a whole looks much the same. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Granville compared with nearby neighborhoods
| Neighborhood | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granville | 2.16 | 60.6 | 5.8% | 29.8% | 7.5% | 2013 | $1,932 | 30.9% | 97.7% | 2.8% |
| Woodlands Village | 1.92 | 25.1 | 6.7% | 81.7% | 9.8% | 1998 | $1,765 | 62.9% | 94.7% | 7.3% |
| Northern Arizona University | 1.73 | 20.1 | 4.6% | 95.9% | 16.7% | 1998 | $1,419 | 43.6% | 96.5% | 10.1% |
| South Flagstaff | 2.01 | 26.3 | 14.4% | 86.3% | 5.6% | 1996 | $1,607 | 40.5% | 89.6% | 4.7% |
| Crossroads | 3.18 | 39.6 | 11.4% | 21.7% | 4.2% | 1982 | $1,935 | 18.4% | 86.2% | 2.1% |
| San Andreas | 3.27 | 32.0 | 27.4% | 69.7% | 3.2% | 1974 | $1,687 | 13.8% | 84.1% | 5.6% |
| Cypress-Riverside | 3.21 | 33.7 | 28.1% | 51.5% | 9.3% | 1972 | $1,719 | 14.5% | 78.6% | 5.0% |
| Belevedere | 3.16 | 37.7 | 16.2% | 21.0% | 5.8% | 1968 | $2,402 | 27.3% | 83.1% | 7.8% |
| San Gorgonio | 3.30 | 28.4 | 32.4% | 65.3% | 7.5% | 1980 | $1,706 | 10.9% | 70.7% | 4.5% |
| Lankershim | 3.59 | 28.6 | 27.8% | 57.8% | 5.2% | 1974 | $1,377 | 5.6% | 65.9% | 11.3% |
| NE-Sterling | 3.34 | 30.5 | 16.9% | 67.0% | 13.7% | 1978 | $1,636 | 8.3% | 76.5% | 11.9% |
All figures 2020–24.
Neighborhoods with similar populations: Shady Lane, Columbus, OH · Villa Cresta, Parkville, MD · Urbanizacion Floral Park, San Juan, PR · Sunset Hills, Peoria, IL · Centennial, Burlington, VT · Squak Mountain, Issaquah, WA · South Broadway, Albuquerque, NM · Cleveland Heights, Lakeland, FL · South Beach Miami Beach, Miami Beach, FL · Cloutier Court, Wilmington, DE
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Granville. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.