Population 73 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Hollywood Hills: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Hollywood Hills
Household size in Hollywood Hills
| Period | Hollywood Hills | Columbia area | South Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.50 | 2.51 | 2.54 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.47 | 2.55 | 2.59 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.82 | 2.55 | 2.57 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.80 | 2.46 | 2.50 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.30 | −0.05 | −0.04 | −0.03 |
Households in Hollywood Hills average 2.80 people, a bit above the national 2.65, so families with children are somewhat more common here. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.50, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Hollywood Hills
| Period | Hollywood Hills | Columbia area | South Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 40.1 | 37.1 | 38.3 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 49.6 | 37.8 | 39.3 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 38.0 | 38.6 | 40.6 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 41.7 | 39.4 | 41.2 | 40.1 |
| Change | +1.6 | +2.3 | +2.9 | +2.3 |
The median resident of Hollywood Hills is 41.7 years old, a bit older than the national median of 40.1.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Hollywood Hills
| Period | Hollywood Hills | Columbia area | South Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.6% | 13.2% | 13.0% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 11.1% | 13.4% | 13.0% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 12.8% | 12.9% | 11.8% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 12.3% | 12.9% | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | +0.8 pts | −0.3 pts | −1.3 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are about as common in Hollywood Hills as they are nationally: 12.3%, against 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Hollywood Hills
Renters in Hollywood Hills
| Period | Hollywood Hills | Columbia area | South Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 36.4% | 31.2% | 30.1% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 25.7% | 32.8% | 31.4% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 19.0% | 32.1% | 30.6% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 6.6% | 30.6% | 28.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | −29.8 pts | −0.6 pts | −2.0 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 6.6% of households in Hollywood Hills rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 37.2% have no mortgage at all, about the same as nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Hollywood Hills
| Period | Hollywood Hills | Columbia area | South Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.5% | 10.7% | 14.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 7.2% | 12.0% | 14.2% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 16.0% | 11.8% | 13.3% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 7.7% | 10.3% | 11.8% | 9.6% |
| Change | +4.2 pts | −0.4 pts | −2.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is on the low side in Hollywood Hills: 7.7% of homes sit empty, against 9.6% nationally, which points to steady demand for housing.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Hollywood Hills
| Period | Hollywood Hills | Columbia area | South Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1985 | 1984 | 1984 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1987 | 1985 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1995 | 1986 | 1987 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1997 | 1990 | 1991 | 1980 |
| Change | +12 | +6 | +7 | +6 |
Hollywood Hills has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1997, versus 1980 nationally.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Hollywood Hills
| Period | Hollywood Hills | Columbia area | South Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $597 | $831 | $780 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $514 | $908 | $859 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $600 | $1,021 | $984 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $679 | $1,285 | $1,294 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$82 | +$453 | +$514 | +$606 |
Rent in Hollywood Hills runs $679 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 51.0% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Hollywood Hills
Bachelor's degrees in Hollywood Hills
| Period | Hollywood Hills | Columbia area | South Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 13.6% | 31.5% | 25.2% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 17.4% | 31.8% | 26.5% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 28.1% | 34.1% | 28.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 42.0% | 35.9% | 32.6% | 35.6% |
| Change | +28.4 pts | +4.4 pts | +7.4 pts | +7.2 pts |
Just over four in ten adults 25 and older in Hollywood Hills (42.0%) have a bachelor's degree or higher, a bit above the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Hollywood Hills
| Period | Hollywood Hills | Columbia area | South Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 85.5% | 88.1% | 84.0% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 79.6% | 88.7% | 85.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 78.8% | 90.2% | 87.8% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 99.0% | 91.4% | 90.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +13.6 pts | +3.3 pts | +6.2 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Hollywood Hills: 99.0% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Hollywood Hills
| Period | Hollywood Hills | Columbia area | South Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.1% | 7.6% | 9.1% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 14.9% | 9.7% | 10.6% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 8.7% | 6.0% | 5.8% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.7% | 5.4% | 4.9% | 5.4% |
| Change | −6.4 pts | −2.2 pts | −4.2 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Hollywood Hills runs below the national rate: 3.7% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4% nationally. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Hollywood Hills compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hollywood Hills | 2.80 | 41.7 | 12.3% | 6.6% | 7.7% | 1997 | $679 | 42.0% | 99.0% | 3.7% |
| Killian | 2.08 | 36.3 | 9.6% | 49.4% | 8.5% | 2011 | $1,397 | 50.8% | 93.2% | 0.0% |
| Columbia area | 2.46 | 39.4 | 12.9% | 30.6% | 10.3% | 1990 | $1,285 | 35.9% | 91.4% | 5.4% |
| Dentsville | 2.41 | 36.4 | 19.6% | 59.4% | 9.0% | 1980 | $1,331 | 19.6% | 84.9% | 4.1% |
| Arcadia Lakes | 2.10 | 45.1 | 15.5% | 34.8% | 13.8% | 1980 | $1,707 | 54.5% | 90.4% | 0.4% |
| Blythewood | 2.69 | 41.3 | 10.5% | 19.4% | 8.2% | 2006 | $1,406 | 49.0% | 96.1% | 5.3% |
| Forest Acres | 2.14 | 43.4 | 8.2% | 22.6% | 8.2% | 1968 | $1,381 | 63.3% | 96.2% | 3.7% |
| Woodfield | 2.24 | 41.6 | 31.2% | 48.6% | 5.0% | 1973 | $1,220 | 20.8% | 90.7% | 7.2% |
| St. Andrews | 1.99 | 33.1 | 15.4% | 71.5% | 11.0% | 1979 | $1,148 | 28.1% | 91.7% | 7.9% |
| Seven Oaks | 2.35 | 41.8 | 14.3% | 38.1% | 7.0% | 1975 | $1,296 | 36.9% | 94.9% | 5.5% |
| Irmo | 2.71 | 41.3 | 12.3% | 16.8% | 5.0% | 1995 | $1,738 | 46.1% | 95.3% | 5.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Perryville, AK · Redland, FL · Rector, MO · Pillsbury, ND · Pike, WV · Philadelphia, IL · Peruque, MO · Perth, ND · Persimmon, KY · Reinersville, OH
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Hollywood Hills. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.