Population 4,713 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Kaseberg-Kingswood: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Kaseberg-Kingswood
Household size in Kaseberg-Kingswood
| Period | Kaseberg-Kingswood | Roseville | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.44 | 2.76 | 2.76 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.44 | 2.83 | 2.81 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.57 | 2.80 | 2.82 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.29 | 2.78 | 2.83 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.15 | +0.02 | +0.07 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Kaseberg-Kingswood is a place of small households, averaging 2.29 people against 2.65 for the U.S., which points to many singles, couples and roommates and relatively few children. Household size has dropped from 2.44 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change. Only one other Roseville neighborhood has smaller households.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Kaseberg-Kingswood
| Period | Kaseberg-Kingswood | Roseville | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 34.7 | 36.5 | 36.7 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 40.8 | 38.4 | 37.6 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 34.6 | 40.3 | 38.7 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 44.4 | 41.0 | 39.6 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +9.7 | +4.5 | +2.9 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Kaseberg-Kingswood skews older: half of its residents are older than 44.4, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families. Only one other Roseville neighborhood is older.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Kaseberg-Kingswood
| Period | Kaseberg-Kingswood | Roseville | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 13.1% | 10.3% | 12.8% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 9.2% | 10.2% | 12.9% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 8.2% | 9.7% | 11.5% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 12.7% | 8.4% | 11.0% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | −0.4 pts | −1.9 pts | −1.7 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head about one in eight households in Kaseberg-Kingswood (12.7%), a bit above the national share of 11.6%. Only one other Roseville neighborhood has a higher share of single-parent households.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Kaseberg-Kingswood
Renters in Kaseberg-Kingswood
| Period | Kaseberg-Kingswood | Roseville | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 42.7% | 32.3% | 37.3% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 46.5% | 34.8% | 40.4% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 52.1% | 33.4% | 39.7% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 43.3% | 31.0% | 37.0% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +0.6 pts | −1.3 pts | −0.3 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
More than four in ten households in Kaseberg-Kingswood rent their homes (43.3%), above the national share of 34.8%. Among owners, 38.8% have paid off their mortgages, about the same as nationally. Only two of Roseville's ten neighborhoods have a higher share of renters.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Kaseberg-Kingswood
| Period | Kaseberg-Kingswood | Roseville | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.8% | 6.8% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 4.2% | 7.0% | 8.7% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 6.1% | 5.7% | 6.7% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 4.3% | 4.3% | 6.7% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +1.5 pts | −2.5 pts | −2.6 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Only 4.3% of homes in Kaseberg-Kingswood are vacant, far below the national rate of 9.6%, which usually means strong demand for housing. That is in line with the rest of Roseville. Only two of Roseville's ten neighborhoods have a lower vacancy rate.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Kaseberg-Kingswood
| Period | Kaseberg-Kingswood | Roseville | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1987 | 1992 | 1980 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1986 | 1992 | 1981 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1986 | 1993 | 1982 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1989 | 1998 | 1985 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +1 | +6 | +5 | +4 | +6 |
Much of the housing in Kaseberg-Kingswood is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 1989, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole. Still, homes here are older than in Roseville as a whole, where the median home dates to 1998. No other Roseville neighborhood has older homes.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Kaseberg-Kingswood
| Period | Kaseberg-Kingswood | Roseville | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $991 | $1,232 | $1,199 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,051 | $1,395 | $1,254 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,458 | $1,612 | $1,488 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $2,209 | $2,233 | $2,018 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$1,218 | +$1,001 | +$818 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in Kaseberg-Kingswood runs $2,209 a month at the median, utilities included, well above the U.S. median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 37.6% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. Among Roseville's ten neighborhoods, though, only two have lower rents.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Kaseberg-Kingswood
Bachelor's degrees in Kaseberg-Kingswood
| Period | Kaseberg-Kingswood | Roseville | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.1% | 35.5% | 30.1% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 25.4% | 37.1% | 30.6% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 31.3% | 42.1% | 33.6% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 33.3% | 44.3% | 37.4% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +13.2 pts | +8.8 pts | +7.2 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are about as common in Kaseberg-Kingswood as nationally: 33.3% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%. The share is lower than in Roseville overall (44.3%). No other Roseville neighborhood has a lower share of college graduates.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Kaseberg-Kingswood
| Period | Kaseberg-Kingswood | Roseville | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 90.5% | 93.6% | 86.8% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 90.7% | 94.9% | 87.6% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 91.8% | 94.4% | 89.0% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 94.1% | 95.6% | 89.9% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +3.6 pts | +2.0 pts | +3.1 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Kaseberg-Kingswood is above the national rate: 94.1% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%. Locally, though, the rate is lower than in Roseville overall (95.6%). Few Roseville neighborhoods have a lower share of high school graduates: only two of 10.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Kaseberg-Kingswood
| Period | Kaseberg-Kingswood | Roseville | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.4% | 6.9% | 9.7% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 5.7% | 8.6% | 12.4% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 3.4% | 4.6% | 6.1% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 9.4% | 4.9% | 6.2% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | +4.0 pts | −2.0 pts | −3.5 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Kaseberg-Kingswood runs well above the national rate: 9.4% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4%. Only one other Roseville neighborhood has higher unemployment. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Kaseberg-Kingswood compared with nearby neighborhoods
| Neighborhood | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaseberg-Kingswood | 2.29 | 44.4 | 12.7% | 43.3% | 4.3% | 1989 | $2,209 | 33.3% | 94.1% | 9.4% |
| Foothill Junction | 2.58 | 38.6 | 6.6% | 11.6% | 6.5% | 1994 | $1,501 | 34.1% | 93.4% | 2.9% |
| Woodcreek Oaks | 2.95 | 36.3 | 20.6% | 28.5% | 5.0% | 1997 | $1,934 | 36.4% | 94.6% | 3.1% |
| Harding | 2.11 | 33.9 | 6.1% | 75.7% | 6.2% | 2000 | $2,290 | 47.4% | 94.4% | 4.0% |
| Junction West | 2.78 | 42.0 | 7.5% | 33.6% | 6.1% | 2004 | $2,746 | 41.5% | 95.1% | 3.3% |
| Stanford | 2.90 | 36.6 | 5.5% | 40.7% | 9.8% | 2002 | $2,595 | 53.8% | 97.5% | 3.5% |
| Blue Oaks | 2.82 | 47.7 | 4.9% | 16.8% | 2.7% | 2008 | $2,250 | 49.8% | 98.4% | 3.2% |
| East Roseville Parkway | 2.49 | 42.3 | 5.0% | 38.4% | 5.7% | 1998 | $2,280 | 57.1% | 98.1% | 5.9% |
| Olympus Pointe | 2.56 | 41.4 | 2.5% | 24.8% | 3.7% | 2004 | $2,757 | 59.1% | 98.1% | 8.6% |
| Johnson Ranch | 2.82 | 37.1 | 12.3% | 61.5% | 9.7% | 1993 | $2,443 | 40.9% | 91.4% | 10.4% |
| East del Paso Heights | 3.37 | 36.2 | 23.6% | 40.1% | 3.7% | 1955 | $1,611 | 14.0% | 81.9% | 7.6% |
All figures 2020–24.
Neighborhoods with similar populations: Argyle Forest, Jacksonville, FL · Arroyo Viejo, Oakland, CA · Audubon Park, Minneapolis, MN · Avalon Park Northwest Village, Alafaya, FL · Bayshore, Wilmington, NC · Beach Park, Tampa, FL · Beacon Hill, San Antonio, TX · Pleasant Grove East, Chesapeake, VA · Rolling Hills, Jacksonville, FL · Pimlico, Baltimore, MD
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Kaseberg-Kingswood. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.