Laurelglen, Bakersfield, CA Demographics

Population 9,637 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Laurelglen, Bakersfield, CA map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Laurelglen: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Laurelglen

Household size in Laurelglen

Household size, people per household
PeriodLaurelglenBakersfield areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–102.723.273.042.68
2010–142.643.343.102.73
2015–192.933.283.092.71
2020–242.963.263.012.65
Change+0.24−0.01−0.03−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

Laurelglen is a place of big households: 2.96 people per home on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. Numbers like that usually point to plenty of families with kids. Even so, the typical household here is smaller than in the wider Bakersfield area, where it has 3.26 people. Household size has climbed from 2.72 in 2006–10, even as the national average fell.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Laurelglen

Median age, years
PeriodLaurelglenBakersfield areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1036.331.835.837.7
2010–1434.732.236.838.6
2015–1933.933.037.939.6
2020–2433.533.939.040.1
Change−2.8+2.1+3.1+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

Laurelglen is young: half of its residents are under 33.5, compared with a national median of 40.1. The population tilts toward young families with children. Since 2006–10, the median age has dropped from 36.3, even as the national median rose.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Laurelglen

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodLaurelglenBakersfield areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1016.5%18.1%13.5%12.3%
2010–1414.9%18.7%13.5%12.3%
2015–1913.7%16.8%12.3%11.6%
2020–2414.7%17.8%12.3%11.6%
Change−1.8 pts−0.4 pts−1.2 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single-parent households are common in Laurelglen: 14.7% of all households, against 11.6% nationally. Locally, though, single parents are less common here than in the Bakersfield area as a whole (17.8%). The single-parent share has fallen 1.8 points since 2006–10, as it has nationally.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Laurelglen

Renters in Laurelglen

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodLaurelglenBakersfield areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1042.4%38.6%42.6%33.3%
2010–1448.3%42.8%45.2%35.6%
2015–1943.8%41.7%45.2%36.0%
2020–2442.5%39.9%44.1%34.8%
Change+0.0 pts+1.3 pts+1.5 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Just over four in ten households in Laurelglen rent their homes (42.5%), above the national share of 34.8%. Among homeowners, 35.6% have no mortgage at all, below the national share of 39.8%. Renting is most common in the southwest and least common in the northeast.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Laurelglen

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodLaurelglenBakersfield areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–107.2%10.9%8.7%11.4%
2010–145.2%9.7%8.1%11.4%
2015–197.5%8.9%7.5%11.1%
2020–245.0%7.8%7.3%9.6%
Change−2.3 pts−3.1 pts−1.4 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Empty homes are scarce in Laurelglen: just 5.0% sit vacant, compared with 9.6% nationally, a sign of a tight housing market. Vacancy is down 2.3 points from 2006–10, as it has nationally.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Laurelglen

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodLaurelglenBakersfield areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–101984198019721974
2010–141984198119731975
2015–191983198219741977
2020–241984198619761980
Change+0+6+4+6
Show on the map ↑︎

The housing in Laurelglen is a little younger than the country's: half of it was built after 1984, against 1980 nationally. That is in line with the rest of the Bakersfield area.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Laurelglen

Rent, per month
PeriodLaurelglenBakersfield areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–10$984$968$1,298$965
2010–14$1,046$1,061$1,379$1,040
2015–19$1,252$1,163$1,721$1,213
2020–24$1,648$1,610$2,229$1,571
Change+$663+$643+$931+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

A typical rental in Laurelglen costs $1,648 a month with utilities, close to the national median of $1,571. Rents are up $663 a month from 2006–10, a 67% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. Rent takes 33.0% of the typical renter's income, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent. Renters on a budget will find the lowest rents in the northeast; the highest are in the southwest.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Laurelglen

Bachelor's degrees in Laurelglen

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodLaurelglenBakersfield areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1029.8%14.9%29.1%28.4%
2010–1430.1%15.3%30.1%29.6%
2015–1927.5%16.2%32.9%32.1%
2020–2429.7%20.5%36.3%35.6%
Change−0.1 pts+5.6 pts+7.1 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

About three in ten adults 25 and older in Laurelglen (29.7%) have a bachelor's degree or higher, a little below the national share of 35.6%. Still, the share is higher than in the wider Bakersfield area (20.5%).

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Laurelglen

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodLaurelglenBakersfield areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1088.5%70.3%79.9%84.9%
2010–1489.5%72.3%80.7%86.1%
2015–1989.6%73.3%82.6%87.7%
2020–2486.4%77.2%84.2%89.3%
Change−2.1 pts+6.9 pts+4.3 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Nearly one in seven adults in Laurelglen never finished high school, a bit more than nationally: 86.4% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% across the U.S. Even so, the rate is higher than in the wider Bakersfield area (77.2%). The share with a diploma is down 2.1 points from 2006–10, even as the national rate rose.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Laurelglen

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodLaurelglenBakersfield areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–106.0%11.5%9.2%8.1%
2010–145.5%13.6%11.3%9.4%
2015–195.5%9.9%6.3%5.6%
2020–248.8%8.6%6.6%5.4%
Change+2.8 pts−2.9 pts−2.6 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Unemployment in Laurelglen runs well above the national rate: 8.8% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4%. Since 2006–10, unemployment has risen 2.8 points, even as the national rate fell. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Laurelglen compared with nearby neighborhoods

NeighborhoodHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Laurelglen2.9633.514.7%42.5%5.0%1984$1,64829.7%86.4%8.8%
Haggin Oaks2.6731.512.7%63.5%4.9%1994$2,24139.4%94.7%5.3%
The Oaks2.9337.816.5%37.0%6.9%1990$2,20732.1%89.4%10.1%
Sagepointe3.2329.039.2%64.5%4.2%1976$1,60011.3%72.9%14.5%
Spice Tract3.3329.819.3%40.1%8.5%1977$1,56513.0%80.8%5.2%
Silver Creek3.3331.113.4%25.9%3.4%1995$1,73020.4%85.3%8.1%
The Seasons3.2534.418.2%23.3%5.2%1996$2,23420.6%83.9%7.2%
Tevis Ranch3.1136.025.6%17.1%3.5%1994$2,01934.2%93.3%5.5%
Stockdale Greens2.6935.519.7%55.0%1.6%1978$1,80936.3%91.4%8.7%
Seven Oaks2.5851.91.7%10.2%4.7%2000$3,34064.1%95.1%1.0%
Terra Vista3.6629.615.3%31.0%5.4%2007$1,95329.0%91.5%6.3%

All figures 2020–24.

Neighborhoods with similar populations: MacKenzie, Detroit, MI · Upper B Street, Hayward, CA · University Of Texas, Austin, TX · The Cape, Jacksonville, FL · South Collinwood, Cleveland, OH · Saddle Rock Golf Club, Aurora, CO · Sable Altura Chambers, Aurora, CO · Rexland Acres, Bakersfield, CA · Pecan Creek, San Tan Valley, AZ · Northwest, Kansas City, KS

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Laurelglen. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.