Population 4,687 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Pacheco: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Pacheco
Household size in Pacheco
| Period | Pacheco | Redding | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.51 | 2.53 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.53 | 2.56 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.69 | 2.47 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.48 | 2.55 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.03 | +0.02 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
The average household in Pacheco has 2.48 people, under the U.S. average of 2.65. That is in line with the rest of Redding. Households are largest in the north and smallest in the southwest.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Pacheco
| Period | Pacheco | Redding | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 45.1 | 40.3 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 49.4 | 40.5 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 48.1 | 41.4 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 52.0 | 41.3 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +6.9 | +1.0 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
With a median age of 52.0, Pacheco is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees. The median age has climbed from 45.1 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change. Residents skew youngest in the southwest and oldest in the center.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Pacheco
| Period | Pacheco | Redding | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.5% | 12.7% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 16.0% | 12.0% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 6.9% | 11.8% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 6.3% | 11.8% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | −2.2 pts | −0.9 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 6.3% of households in Pacheco, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Pacheco
Renters in Pacheco
| Period | Pacheco | Redding | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 13.0% | 38.3% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 25.1% | 42.1% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 21.7% | 41.6% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 16.5% | 40.8% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +3.5 pts | +2.5 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 16.5% of households in Pacheco rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 39.5% have no mortgage at all, about the same as nationally. Renting is most common in the southwest and least common in the center.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Pacheco
| Period | Pacheco | Redding | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.0% | 8.2% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 4.8% | 9.4% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 9.3% | 8.0% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 7.5% | 9.7% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +2.5 pts | +1.5 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is on the low side in Pacheco: 7.5% of homes sit empty, against 9.6% nationally, which points to steady demand for housing.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Pacheco
| Period | Pacheco | Redding | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1977 | 1980 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1976 | 1980 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1979 | 1981 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1977 | 1982 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +0 | +2 | +4 | +6 |
Homes in Pacheco are about the same age as the nation's housing: the median home was built in 1977, versus 1980 nationally. Homes here are older than in Redding as a whole, where the median home dates to 1982.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Pacheco
| Period | Pacheco | Redding | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,001 | $975 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $974 | $1,100 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,200 | $1,222 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,493 | $1,628 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$492 | +$653 | +$931 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Pacheco costs $1,493 a month with utilities, close to the national median of $1,571. Rents here are lower than in Redding overall ($1,628). Rent takes 26.5% of the typical renter's income, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent. Renters on a budget will find the lowest rents in the southeast; the highest are in the north.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Pacheco
Bachelor's degrees in Pacheco
| Period | Pacheco | Redding | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 21.9% | 22.9% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 18.2% | 22.4% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 20.8% | 25.1% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 25.1% | 26.6% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +3.2 pts | +3.7 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Pacheco have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 25.1%, against 35.6% nationally. The picture is much the same across Redding.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Pacheco
| Period | Pacheco | Redding | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 93.2% | 89.7% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 87.6% | 90.2% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 91.7% | 92.0% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 91.7% | 93.4% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | −1.6 pts | +3.7 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
About nine in ten adults in Pacheco have finished high school (91.7%), a bit above the national rate of 89.3%. Still, the rate is lower than in Redding overall (93.4%).
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Pacheco
| Period | Pacheco | Redding | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.5% | 11.6% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 17.3% | 11.4% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.9% | 5.4% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 4.0% | 5.6% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −6.5 pts | −6.0 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Pacheco runs below the national rate: 4.0% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4% nationally. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Pacheco compared with nearby neighborhoods
| Neighborhood | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacheco | 2.48 | 52.0 | 6.3% | 16.5% | 7.5% | 1977 | $1,493 | 25.1% | 91.7% | 4.0% |
| Cascade | 2.44 | 38.9 | 14.5% | 38.9% | 10.7% | 1982 | $1,032 | 15.0% | 87.1% | 7.5% |
| Starview | 3.01 | 34.8 | 8.2% | 30.1% | 4.7% | 1981 | $1,568 | 19.4% | 95.8% | 2.0% |
| Enterprise | 2.16 | 36.8 | 20.3% | 67.1% | 8.3% | 1978 | $1,123 | 12.0% | 90.2% | 6.1% |
| Happy Valley | 2.92 | 43.4 | 10.7% | 10.2% | 7.1% | 1984 | $1,031 | 12.9% | 83.3% | 8.3% |
| Columbia | 2.57 | 43.0 | 5.0% | 18.3% | 7.8% | 1991 | $1,650 | 36.0% | 96.0% | 5.8% |
| Jacoby Creek | 2.33 | 49.6 | 9.5% | 20.7% | 7.7% | 1967 | $1,857 | 58.4% | 96.9% | 3.8% |
| Rohnerville | 2.51 | 41.1 | 15.3% | 37.7% | 5.9% | 1979 | $1,255 | 25.4% | 87.3% | 5.7% |
| Cutten | 2.60 | 41.4 | 13.2% | 31.3% | 8.1% | 1970 | $1,685 | 33.1% | 96.7% | 1.4% |
| Old Town | 2.28 | 37.2 | 16.0% | 69.0% | 14.0% | 1947 | $1,232 | 24.2% | 87.6% | 12.2% |
| The West Side | 2.43 | 37.4 | 17.8% | 68.8% | 14.7% | 1945 | $1,417 | 27.5% | 85.1% | 12.6% |
All figures 2020–24.
Neighborhoods with similar populations: Westhaven, Franklin, TN · Villa de Loiza, Rio Grande, PR · Greenville South Broadway Historic District, Greenville, OH · Northport, Fargo, ND · Meadowbrook Heights, Kansas City, MO · Woodstock, Jacksonville, FL · West Slope, Beaverton, OR · Waynita-Simonds-Norway Hill, Bothell, WA · Town Center, Oxnard, CA · Taylor, Cedar Rapids, IA
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Pacheco. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.