Population 3,617 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Sequoyah: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Sequoyah
Household size in Sequoyah
| Period | Sequoyah | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.29 | 2.56 | 2.55 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.56 | 2.60 | 2.60 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.46 | 2.60 | 2.63 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.40 | 2.59 | 2.58 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.11 | +0.03 | +0.03 | −0.03 |
Sequoyah is a place of small households, averaging 2.40 people against 2.65 for the U.S., which points to many singles, couples and roommates and relatively few children. Household size has climbed from 2.29 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Sequoyah
| Period | Sequoyah | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 39.2 | 37.2 | 37.4 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 34.3 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 36.6 | 37.8 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 34.4 | 38.0 | 38.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | −4.8 | +0.8 | +0.6 | +2.3 |
With a median age of just 34.4, Sequoyah is far younger than the country as a whole (40.1), a population that tilts toward young adults, many of them living alone or as couples.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Sequoyah
| Period | Sequoyah | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.4% | 11.7% | 11.9% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 16.1% | 12.5% | 12.1% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 18.7% | 12.2% | 12.1% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 14.1% | 11.6% | 12.0% | 11.6% |
| Change | +1.8 pts | −0.1 pts | +0.1 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head about one in seven households in Sequoyah (14.1%), above the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Sequoyah
Renters in Sequoyah
| Period | Sequoyah | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 47.0% | 32.5% | 31.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 45.7% | 33.8% | 33.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 45.9% | 35.2% | 34.4% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 49.4% | 34.5% | 34.2% | 34.8% |
| Change | +2.4 pts | +2.1 pts | +2.4 pts | +1.5 pts |
Renting is far more common in Sequoyah than nationally: 49.4% of households rent their homes, against 34.8%. Among homeowners, 50.3% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Sequoyah
| Period | Sequoyah | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.7% | 10.1% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 9.5% | 10.3% | 12.7% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 16.6% | 10.6% | 13.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 12.4% | 8.5% | 11.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +1.7 pts | −1.7 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
A few more homes sit empty in Sequoyah than nationally: 12.4%, against 9.6%. The count includes vacation homes and homes between owners or tenants, not just abandoned ones.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Sequoyah
| Period | Sequoyah | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1952 | 1978 | 1976 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1949 | 1979 | 1977 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1950 | 1980 | 1979 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1948 | 1983 | 1982 | 1980 |
| Change | −3 | +6 | +7 | +6 |
Sequoyah is a place of older homes: half were built before 1948, while the national median is 1980. That means established neighborhoods, and more houses that may need updating. Only one other Tulsa neighborhood has older homes.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Sequoyah
| Period | Sequoyah | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $756 | $794 | $716 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $773 | $872 | $805 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $887 | $979 | $897 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,019 | $1,219 | $1,127 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$263 | +$425 | +$411 | +$606 |
The median renter in Sequoyah pays $1,019 a month for rent and utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 34.3% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Sequoyah
Bachelor's degrees in Sequoyah
| Period | Sequoyah | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.1% | 25.5% | 24.2% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 5.5% | 26.2% | 24.9% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 10.8% | 27.7% | 26.1% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 14.2% | 30.3% | 28.9% | 35.6% |
| Change | +6.1 pts | +4.8 pts | +4.7 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Sequoyah have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 14.2%, against 35.6% nationally. Compared with other Tulsa neighborhoods, Sequoyah has a lower share of college graduates than most.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Sequoyah
| Period | Sequoyah | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 76.5% | 87.7% | 86.0% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 74.4% | 88.4% | 87.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 73.2% | 89.3% | 88.1% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 76.9% | 90.1% | 89.3% | 89.3% |
| Change | +0.4 pts | +2.4 pts | +3.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
23.1% of adults in Sequoyah never finished high school, well above the national share: only 76.9% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally. Compared with other Tulsa neighborhoods, Sequoyah has a lower share of high school graduates than most.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Sequoyah
| Period | Sequoyah | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.1% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 11.4% | 7.1% | 6.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 6.9% | 5.5% | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.4% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Change | −2.7 pts | −0.9 pts | −1.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
Finding work has been harder in Sequoyah: 7.4% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well above the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Sequoyah compared with nearby neighborhoods
| Neighborhood | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequoyah | 2.40 | 34.4 | 14.1% | 49.4% | 12.4% | 1948 | $1,019 | 14.2% | 76.9% | 7.4% |
| Maxwell | 3.14 | 29.1 | 26.9% | 52.7% | 8.4% | 1960 | $1,000 | 5.2% | 64.8% | 6.8% |
| Turner Park | 1.99 | 36.6 | 10.6% | 42.1% | 12.8% | 1947 | $1,230 | 34.9% | 92.4% | 3.5% |
| Springdale | 2.98 | 30.5 | 17.9% | 51.7% | 10.7% | 1956 | $902 | 4.6% | 62.5% | 15.4% |
| McKinley Mitchell | 3.09 | 27.1 | 17.9% | 45.4% | 9.2% | 1957 | $1,171 | 4.7% | 71.5% | 6.4% |
| McClure Park | 2.70 | 32.9 | 17.5% | 37.0% | 10.5% | 1954 | $1,197 | 14.9% | 78.8% | 6.2% |
| Mayo Meadow | 2.04 | 34.2 | 7.5% | 37.4% | 10.6% | 1955 | $1,192 | 43.7% | 95.4% | 5.1% |
| Downtown Tulsa | 1.42 | 38.0 | 4.9% | 79.1% | 16.6% | 1976 | $1,203 | 34.3% | 86.4% | 7.9% |
| Gilcrease Hills | 2.85 | 40.2 | 23.6% | 41.4% | 5.9% | 1980 | $1,083 | 35.5% | 91.4% | 7.0% |
| Riverview Park | 1.96 | 35.9 | 19.5% | 90.4% | 11.4% | 1977 | $656 | 26.3% | 85.3% | 20.2% |
| Brookside | 1.91 | 43.9 | 9.2% | 47.7% | 9.8% | 1960 | $1,407 | 55.1% | 94.7% | 3.7% |
All figures 2020–24.
Neighborhoods with similar populations: West Central, Springfield, MO · Canterbury, Mobile, AL · Carver, Waco, TX · Cascade Highlands, Vancouver, WA · Castle Manor, Milwaukee, WI · Cedar-Isles-Dean, Minneapolis, MN · Celina Main Street Historic District, Celina, OH · Central Business District, Louisville, KY · Central State, Schenectady, NY · Cherokee Triangle, Louisville, KY
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Sequoyah. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.