Population 178 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Sugar Creek: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Sugar Creek
Household size in Sugar Creek
| Period | Sugar Creek | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.35 | 2.53 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.49 | 2.57 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.34 | 2.57 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.20 | 2.53 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.15 | +0.00 | −0.03 |
Sugar Creek is a place of small households, averaging 2.20 people against 2.65 for the U.S., which points to many singles, couples and roommates and relatively few children. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.35, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Sugar Creek
| Period | Sugar Creek | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 43.6 | 38.3 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 44.0 | 39.2 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 50.0 | 39.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 42.9 | 39.9 | 40.1 |
| Change | −0.7 | +1.6 | +2.3 |
Sugar Creek skews older than the country: its median age is 42.9, against 40.1 nationally.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Sugar Creek
| Period | Sugar Creek | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.3% | 12.2% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 12.0% | 12.0% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 3.6% | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 13.7% | 11.8% | 11.6% |
| Change | +6.4 pts | −0.4 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are more common in Sugar Creek than nationally: 13.7%, against 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Sugar Creek
Renters in Sugar Creek
| Period | Sugar Creek | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 37.5% | 30.4% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 32.0% | 32.9% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 25.7% | 33.7% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 32.7% | 33.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | −4.7 pts | +2.6 pts | +1.5 pts |
About a third of households in Sugar Creek rent their homes (32.7%), close to the national share of 34.8%. Nearly three-quarters of owners (72.7%) have paid off their mortgages, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Sugar Creek
| Period | Sugar Creek | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 21.5% | 11.5% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 20.5% | 11.8% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 30.5% | 11.8% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 25.6% | 10.1% | 9.6% |
| Change | +4.0 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 25.6% of the housing in Sugar Creek, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Sugar Creek
| Period | Sugar Creek | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1979 | 1981 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1981 | 1982 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1977 | 1983 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1987 | 1986 | 1980 |
| Change | +8 | +6 | +6 |
The housing in Sugar Creek is younger than the country's: half of it was built after 1987, against 1980 nationally. Tennessee as a whole looks much the same.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Sugar Creek
| Period | Sugar Creek | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $365 | $761 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $382 | $837 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $418 | $961 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $566 | $1,286 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$201 | +$526 | +$606 |
The median renter in Sugar Creek pays $566 a month for rent and utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 29.9% of household income on rent, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Sugar Creek
Bachelor's degrees in Sugar Creek
| Period | Sugar Creek | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.9% | 23.9% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 9.8% | 25.3% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 10.3% | 27.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 11.1% | 31.4% | 35.6% |
| Change | +5.2 pts | +7.5 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Sugar Creek have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 11.1%, against 35.6% nationally.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Sugar Creek
| Period | Sugar Creek | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 67.4% | 83.3% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 70.3% | 85.4% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 77.0% | 87.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 80.6% | 89.9% | 89.3% |
| Change | +13.2 pts | +6.6 pts | +4.3 pts |
Nearly one in five adults in Sugar Creek never finished high school, well above the national share: only 80.6% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Sugar Creek
| Period | Sugar Creek | Tennessee | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.3% | 8.6% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 16.5% | 9.6% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 5.8% | 5.4% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.5% | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| Change | −6.8 pts | −3.8 pts | −2.7 pts |
Jobs have been easier to find in Sugar Creek than nationally: unemployment was 3.5%, against 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Sugar Creek compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar Creek | 2.20 | 42.9 | 13.7% | 32.7% | 25.6% | 1987 | $566 | 11.1% | 80.6% | 3.5% |
| Gainesboro | 2.36 | 47.5 | 6.3% | 21.1% | 15.6% | 1986 | $742 | 13.2% | 83.3% | 6.9% |
| Hilham | 2.75 | 43.7 | 18.0% | 25.4% | 20.8% | 1985 | $650 | 11.9% | 85.8% | 2.2% |
| Whitleyville | 2.39 | 40.4 | 12.8% | 27.9% | 30.0% | 1986 | $672 | 8.1% | 85.1% | 2.3% |
| Timothy | 2.83 | 51.0 | 13.6% | 20.0% | 26.4% | 1984 | $842 | 13.3% | 82.2% | 1.3% |
| Union Hill | 2.01 | 41.7 | 10.7% | 13.3% | 19.3% | 1986 | $717 | 19.4% | 94.4% | 8.6% |
| Morrison Creek | 2.37 | 48.4 | 7.0% | 13.0% | 1.6% | 1993 | $779 | 8.2% | 75.0% | 9.1% |
| Moss | 2.35 | 47.8 | 11.7% | 4.2% | 11.1% | 1984 | $685 | 10.5% | 78.1% | 2.1% |
| North Springs | 2.39 | 36.1 | 13.5% | 34.8% | 30.5% | 1984 | $618 | 7.5% | 85.9% | 1.8% |
| Celina | 2.19 | 47.2 | 12.2% | 36.8% | 11.5% | 1985 | $547 | 10.1% | 83.8% | 12.5% |
| Miles Crossroads | 2.04 | 41.2 | 10.9% | 14.8% | 20.3% | 1986 | $709 | 18.4% | 93.7% | 8.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Smithwick, SD · Kaseville, PA · Kaweah, CA · Kellner, WI · Kelsa, VA · Kennard, OH · Kennard, VA · Skaggs Corner, AL · Skyland, VA · Smith Valley, NY
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Sugar Creek. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.