Summit Heights, Fontana, CA Demographics

Population 2,743 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Summit Heights, Fontana, CA map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Summit Heights: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Summit Heights

Household size in Summit Heights

Household size, people per household
PeriodSummit HeightsFontanaRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–104.094.173.353.042.68
2010–144.084.193.433.102.73
2015–193.993.963.423.092.71
2020–243.543.753.343.012.65
Change−0.55−0.42−0.01−0.03−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

Summit Heights is a place of big households: 3.54 people per home on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. Numbers like that usually point to plenty of families with kids. Even so, the typical household here is smaller than in Fontana as a whole, where it has 3.75 people. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 4.09, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Summit Heights

Median age, years
PeriodSummit HeightsFontanaRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1031.128.533.635.837.7
2010–1430.829.934.636.838.6
2015–1932.431.635.937.939.6
2020–2445.634.337.039.040.1
Change+14.5+5.7+3.4+3.1+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

Summit Heights skews older: half of its residents are older than 45.6, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Summit Heights

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodSummit HeightsFontanaRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1011.0%17.3%15.2%13.5%12.3%
2010–1414.9%18.2%15.7%13.5%12.3%
2015–196.9%15.5%14.4%12.3%11.6%
2020–2410.9%15.8%14.8%12.3%11.6%
Change−0.1 pts−1.5 pts−0.3 pts−1.2 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single parents head just over one in ten households in Summit Heights (10.9%), close to the national share of 11.6%. Single parents are less common here than in Fontana as a whole (15.8%).

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Summit Heights

Renters in Summit Heights

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodSummit HeightsFontanaRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1010.4%29.8%32.3%42.6%33.3%
2010–1421.7%34.8%36.6%45.2%35.6%
2015–1923.9%35.1%36.7%45.2%36.0%
2020–246.0%33.8%34.2%44.1%34.8%
Change−4.5 pts+4.0 pts+1.9 pts+1.5 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Only 6.0% of households in Summit Heights rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Just over one in eight owners (13.3%) have paid off their mortgages, well below the national share of 39.8%.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Summit Heights

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodSummit HeightsFontanaRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–107.0%8.3%11.8%8.7%11.4%
2010–142.2%5.6%10.9%8.1%11.4%
2015–192.1%4.4%9.4%7.5%11.1%
2020–242.0%3.1%7.8%7.3%9.6%
Change−5.0 pts−5.2 pts−4.0 pts−1.4 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Only 2.0% of homes in Summit Heights are vacant, far below the national rate of 9.6%, which usually means strong demand for housing. The picture is much the same across Fontana.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Summit Heights

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodSummit HeightsFontanaRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1020031984198319721974
2010–1420031986198419731975
2015–1920041985198419741977
2020–2420051988198619761980
Change+2+4+3+4+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Summit Heights has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 2005, versus 1980 nationally.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Summit Heights

Rent, per month
PeriodSummit HeightsFontanaRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–10$2,001$1,449$1,287$1,298$965
2010–14$980$1,432$1,332$1,379$1,040
2015–19$2,201$1,684$1,549$1,721$1,213
2020–24$2,704$2,165$2,083$2,229$1,571
Change+$703+$717+$796+$931+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

A typical rental in Summit Heights costs $2,704 a month with utilities, well above the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 34.6% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Summit Heights

Bachelor's degrees in Summit Heights

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodSummit HeightsFontanaRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1027.5%14.0%19.2%29.1%28.4%
2010–1432.9%15.0%19.4%30.1%29.6%
2015–1931.0%17.0%21.2%32.9%32.1%
2020–2436.4%20.6%24.0%36.3%35.6%
Change+8.9 pts+6.6 pts+4.8 pts+7.1 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

College degrees are about as common in Summit Heights as nationally: 36.4% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%. The share is higher than in Fontana as a whole (20.6%).

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Summit Heights

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodSummit HeightsFontanaRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1088.5%69.6%77.9%79.9%84.9%
2010–1493.8%70.9%78.6%80.7%86.1%
2015–1993.7%73.7%80.6%82.6%87.7%
2020–2485.0%78.8%82.5%84.2%89.3%
Change−3.5 pts+9.1 pts+4.6 pts+4.3 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Just over one in seven adults in Summit Heights never finished high school, more than nationally: 85.0% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% across the U.S. Still, the rate is higher than in Fontana as a whole (78.8%).

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Summit Heights

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodSummit HeightsFontanaRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–107.6%10.4%11.4%9.2%8.1%
2010–1410.2%15.7%14.4%11.3%9.4%
2015–190.4%6.9%7.7%6.3%5.6%
2020–246.5%6.5%6.8%6.6%5.4%
Change−1.1 pts−3.9 pts−4.6 pts−2.6 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Jobs have been a little harder to find in Summit Heights than nationally: unemployment was 6.5%, against 5.4%. Fontana as a whole looks much the same. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Summit Heights compared with nearby neighborhoods

NeighborhoodHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Summit Heights3.5445.610.9%6.0%2.0%2005$2,70436.4%85.0%6.5%
Hunter's Ridge3.3136.47.3%4.2%2.1%1999$2,81750.6%97.5%3.7%
Rancho Fontana3.2240.67.8%25.8%1.1%1999$2,67035.1%93.8%7.7%
West End3.4037.911.5%13.1%3.4%1994$2,76234.0%91.3%5.4%
Downtown Fontana3.0736.714.3%77.1%4.0%1982$1,0809.6%69.9%4.6%
Victoria Gardens2.7339.68.7%62.8%9.8%2005$2,56753.6%93.1%4.1%
Downtown Rialto3.1233.515.7%79.3%8.9%1973$1,3687.6%70.9%13.1%
Southridge Village3.8734.09.5%32.5%2.6%1988$2,17813.9%78.1%7.2%
Muscoy4.6134.527.4%49.1%5.6%1963$1,8306.8%57.0%9.3%
Terrace4.0531.324.0%29.9%7.9%1970$1,8508.1%66.5%6.5%
Yerdemont3.3832.915.0%32.3%2.6%1998$1,90229.3%91.5%5.3%

All figures 2020–24.

Neighborhoods with similar populations: Coquina Key, St. Petersburg, FL · South Roanoke, Roanoke, VA · Elton Hills, Rochester, MN · Edgewood, Michigan City, IN · Downtown Grand Forks, Grand Forks, ND · Downtown East, Minneapolis, MN · Downtown Conneaut, Conneaut, OH · Darkesville, Inwood, WV · Caprock, Lubbock, TX · Burrage, Hanson, MA

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Summit Heights. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.