Population 5,488 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Surrey Lane: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Surrey Lane
Household size in Surrey Lane
| Period | Surrey Lane | Bergenfield | New York area | New Jersey | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.39 | 2.93 | 2.79 | 2.77 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 3.46 | 3.06 | 2.85 | 2.82 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 3.75 | 3.13 | 2.82 | 2.78 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 3.64 | 3.16 | 2.79 | 2.76 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.25 | +0.24 | −0.00 | −0.01 | −0.03 |
Households in Surrey Lane are large by national standards, averaging 3.64 people against 2.65 for the U.S. That usually means more families with children at home. Household size has climbed from 3.39 in 2006–10, even as the national average fell.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Surrey Lane
| Period | Surrey Lane | Bergenfield | New York area | New Jersey | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 35.3 | 40.0 | 38.0 | 39.1 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 35.5 | 39.9 | 38.7 | 40.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 32.5 | 40.0 | 39.8 | 41.0 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 32.7 | 40.5 | 40.4 | 40.9 | 40.1 |
| Change | −2.6 | +0.5 | +2.4 | +1.8 | +2.3 |
With a median age of just 32.7, Surrey Lane is far younger than the country as a whole (40.1), a population that tilts toward young families with children. The median age has dropped from 35.3 in 2006–10, even as the national median rose. The youngest areas are in the southeast, the oldest in the north.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Surrey Lane
| Period | Surrey Lane | Bergenfield | New York area | New Jersey | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.8% | 8.5% | 13.1% | 11.6% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 7.3% | 8.2% | 12.8% | 11.8% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 7.6% | 8.6% | 11.4% | 10.8% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.7% | 7.4% | 11.6% | 11.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | −1.1 pts | −1.2 pts | −1.5 pts | −0.4 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Surrey Lane: 5.7% of households, against 11.6% nationally. The single-parent share has edged down 1.1 points since 2006–10, in line with the national trend.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Surrey Lane
Renters in Surrey Lane
| Period | Surrey Lane | Bergenfield | New York area | New Jersey | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.2% | 28.9% | 47.1% | 33.1% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 9.2% | 32.9% | 48.7% | 35.0% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 10.0% | 31.5% | 48.8% | 36.1% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 10.4% | 30.4% | 48.6% | 36.2% | 34.8% |
| Change | −0.9 pts | +1.4 pts | +1.5 pts | +3.1 pts | +1.5 pts |
Surrey Lane is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 10.4% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Among homeowners, 34.9% have no mortgage at all, below the national share of 39.8%. The renter share is down 0.9 points from 2006–10, even as the national share rose.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Surrey Lane
| Period | Surrey Lane | Bergenfield | New York area | New Jersey | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.6% | 5.8% | 9.1% | 9.1% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 4.8% | 6.1% | 9.0% | 9.3% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 8.3% | 5.1% | 9.1% | 9.3% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 5.5% | 2.9% | 7.9% | 6.6% | 9.6% |
| Change | +0.9 pts | −2.9 pts | −1.2 pts | −2.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
Only 5.5% of homes in Surrey Lane are vacant, far below the national rate of 9.6%, which usually means strong demand for housing. Even so, the rate is higher than in Bergenfield overall (2.9%). Since 2006–10, vacancy has edged up 0.9 points, even as the national rate fell.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Surrey Lane
| Period | Surrey Lane | Bergenfield | New York area | New Jersey | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1953 | 1952 | 1957 | 1965 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1951 | 1953 | 1958 | 1966 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1953 | 1953 | 1959 | 1967 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1956 | 1954 | 1962 | 1969 | 1980 |
| Change | +3 | +2 | +5 | +5 | +6 |
Surrey Lane is a place of older homes: half were built before 1956, while the national median is 1980. That means established neighborhoods, and more houses that may need updating. The median year built has moved up from 1953 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Surrey Lane
| Period | Surrey Lane | Bergenfield | New York area | New Jersey | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,163 | $1,244 | $1,268 | $1,246 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,768 | $1,405 | $1,377 | $1,324 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,902 | $1,663 | $1,645 | $1,522 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $2,386 | $1,931 | $2,060 | $1,896 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$1,223 | +$686 | +$792 | +$651 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Surrey Lane costs $2,386 a month with utilities, well above the national median of $1,571. Rents are up $1,223 a month from 2006–10, a 105% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. Rent takes 45.1% of the typical renter's income, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. The priciest rents are in the south; the most affordable are in the north.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Surrey Lane
Bachelor's degrees in Surrey Lane
| Period | Surrey Lane | Bergenfield | New York area | New Jersey | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 48.7% | 39.0% | 35.0% | 34.7% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 53.3% | 37.6% | 36.7% | 36.4% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 55.1% | 45.0% | 39.9% | 39.6% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 60.3% | 49.0% | 43.6% | 43.4% | 35.6% |
| Change | +11.6 pts | +10.0 pts | +8.6 pts | +8.6 pts | +7.2 pts |
Surrey Lane is highly educated: about six in ten adults 25 and older (60.3%) hold at least a bachelor's degree, far above the national share of 35.6%. Since 2006–10, the share with a degree has risen 11.6 points, mirroring the country. College graduates are most concentrated in the south and least in the northeast.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Surrey Lane
| Period | Surrey Lane | Bergenfield | New York area | New Jersey | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 89.2% | 88.7% | 83.7% | 87.0% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 92.5% | 89.3% | 84.6% | 88.1% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 93.7% | 92.0% | 86.2% | 89.5% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 94.0% | 91.5% | 86.9% | 90.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +4.8 pts | +2.8 pts | +3.3 pts | +3.2 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Surrey Lane is above the national rate: 94.0% of adults have a diploma, against 89.3%. The share with a diploma is up 4.8 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Surrey Lane
| Period | Surrey Lane | Bergenfield | New York area | New Jersey | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.6% | 5.4% | 7.9% | 7.9% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 10.2% | 7.5% | 9.5% | 9.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 1.8% | 4.0% | 5.7% | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 8.0% | 5.8% | 6.9% | 6.4% | 5.4% |
| Change | +0.4 pts | +0.5 pts | −0.9 pts | −1.5 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Surrey Lane runs well above the national rate: 8.0% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Surrey Lane compared with nearby neighborhoods
| Neighborhood | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surrey Lane | 3.64 | 32.7 | 5.7% | 10.4% | 5.5% | 1956 | $2,386 | 60.3% | 94.0% | 8.0% |
| Pleasant Acres | 3.08 | 39.1 | 8.1% | 27.7% | 5.0% | 1952 | $2,553 | 46.9% | 94.8% | 4.8% |
| West Englewood | 3.10 | 37.7 | 12.0% | 36.7% | 5.9% | 1951 | $2,619 | 35.5% | 89.1% | 3.4% |
| Queen Anne Park | 3.40 | 37.5 | 4.5% | 25.0% | 2.6% | 1941 | $1,647 | 60.0% | 95.7% | 5.8% |
| Colonial Village | 2.95 | 42.9 | 11.3% | 5.5% | 6.2% | 1947 | $1,755 | 59.0% | 95.0% | 6.1% |
| Linwood | 2.24 | 43.6 | 11.1% | 51.9% | 11.5% | 1974 | $2,235 | 62.6% | 95.1% | 2.5% |
| Coytesville | 2.84 | 44.7 | 9.0% | 58.0% | 7.4% | 1973 | $2,417 | 60.5% | 95.0% | 3.1% |
| Passaic Junction | 2.53 | 42.5 | 6.3% | 26.7% | 1.7% | 1953 | $2,294 | 44.6% | 94.5% | 5.1% |
| Koreatown | 2.81 | 43.5 | 11.5% | 64.4% | 3.4% | 1972 | $2,086 | 49.0% | 85.9% | 5.4% |
| Warren Point | 2.93 | 42.9 | 11.2% | 12.7% | 2.4% | 1953 | $2,190 | 56.4% | 96.0% | 8.2% |
| Spuyten Duyvil | 2.10 | 52.5 | 6.7% | 39.4% | 5.4% | 1959 | $2,238 | 64.4% | 93.3% | 5.2% |
All figures 2020–24.
Neighborhoods with similar populations: Ardmore, Winston-Salem, NC · Windom, Minneapolis, MN · Berger, Dolton, IL · Burlingame Gate, Burlingame, CA · Riverdale, Detroit, MI · Oakhurst, Decatur, GA · Ogden, Vancouver, WA · Old Saginaw City, Saginaw, MI · Old Town, Eureka, CA · Paloma Lake, Round Rock, TX
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Surrey Lane. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.