Population 4,724 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Upper Land Park: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Upper Land Park
Household size in Upper Land Park
| Period | Upper Land Park | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.07 | 2.76 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.27 | 2.81 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.65 | 2.82 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.03 | 2.83 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.04 | +0.07 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Households in Upper Land Park are small: just 2.03 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Upper Land Park has smaller households than the great majority of Sacramento neighborhoods.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Upper Land Park
| Period | Upper Land Park | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 33.7 | 36.7 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 32.6 | 37.6 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 28.4 | 38.7 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 39.0 | 39.6 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +5.3 | +2.9 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Half of the people in Upper Land Park are younger than 39.0 and half are older, close to the national median of 40.1. Since 2006–10, the median age has climbed from 33.7, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Upper Land Park
| Period | Upper Land Park | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 30.0% | 12.8% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 27.7% | 12.9% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 38.5% | 11.5% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 13.3% | 11.0% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | −16.7 pts | −1.7 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head just over one in eight households in Upper Land Park (13.3%), a bit above the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Upper Land Park
Renters in Upper Land Park
| Period | Upper Land Park | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 62.3% | 37.3% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 64.5% | 40.4% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 58.4% | 39.7% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 53.7% | 37.0% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | −8.6 pts | −0.3 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Renters far outnumber owners in Upper Land Park: 53.7% of households rent their homes, against 34.8% nationally. Among homeowners, 29.9% have no mortgage at all, below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Upper Land Park
| Period | Upper Land Park | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.8% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 5.2% | 8.7% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.9% | 6.7% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 11.2% | 6.7% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +3.5 pts | −2.6 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
A few more homes sit empty in Upper Land Park than nationally: 11.2%, against 9.6%. The count includes vacation homes and homes between owners or tenants, not just abandoned ones. Few Sacramento neighborhoods have a higher vacancy rate: only five of 61.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Upper Land Park
| Period | Upper Land Park | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1948 | 1980 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1947 | 1981 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1947 | 1982 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1953 | 1985 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +5 | +5 | +4 | +6 |
The housing in Upper Land Park is old by national standards: the median home dates to 1953, against 1980 for the U.S., so buyers will find more older houses, some of them due for updates. Only four of Sacramento's 61 neighborhoods have older homes.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Upper Land Park
| Period | Upper Land Park | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $575 | $1,199 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $546 | $1,254 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $869 | $1,488 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,893 | $2,018 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$1,319 | +$818 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in Upper Land Park runs $1,893 a month at the median, utilities included, well above the U.S. median of $1,571. Locally, though, rents here are lower than in the Sacramento area overall ($2,018). The typical renter here spends 28.3% of household income on rent, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Upper Land Park
Bachelor's degrees in Upper Land Park
| Period | Upper Land Park | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 34.1% | 30.1% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 29.7% | 30.6% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 36.3% | 33.6% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 52.6% | 37.4% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +18.5 pts | +7.2 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
Upper Land Park is highly educated: just over half of adults 25 and older (52.6%) hold at least a bachelor's degree, far above the national share of 35.6%. Upper Land Park has a higher share of college graduates than most Sacramento neighborhoods.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Upper Land Park
| Period | Upper Land Park | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 80.2% | 86.8% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 74.6% | 87.6% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 86.6% | 89.0% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 87.8% | 89.9% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +7.6 pts | +3.1 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Upper Land Park is close to the national rate: 87.8% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%. The rate is lower than in the Sacramento area overall (89.9%).
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Upper Land Park
| Period | Upper Land Park | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.7% | 9.7% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 26.8% | 12.4% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 8.2% | 6.1% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.0% | 6.2% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −18.7 pts | −3.5 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Upper Land Park has been low: just 2.0% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Of Sacramento's 61 neighborhoods, only five have lower unemployment. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Upper Land Park compared with nearby neighborhoods
| Neighborhood | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper Land Park | 2.03 | 39.0 | 13.3% | 53.7% | 11.2% | 1953 | $1,893 | 52.6% | 87.8% | 2.0% |
| Land Park | 2.23 | 45.0 | 6.9% | 28.4% | 5.7% | 1942 | $2,043 | 69.5% | 96.1% | 1.0% |
| Richmond Grove | 1.79 | 38.7 | 6.7% | 77.1% | 10.1% | 1961 | $1,698 | 60.3% | 88.7% | 5.6% |
| Northeast Village | 2.73 | 39.4 | 13.4% | 19.7% | 5.8% | 1993 | $2,573 | 45.8% | 93.3% | 6.6% |
| Curtis Park | 2.09 | 44.9 | 3.1% | 38.7% | 4.8% | 1941 | $1,972 | 67.9% | 96.1% | 4.7% |
| Downtown Sacramento | 1.31 | 40.4 | 3.1% | 80.3% | 11.7% | 1970 | $828 | 25.4% | 85.8% | 24.7% |
| Midtown | 1.52 | 33.6 | 4.1% | 89.0% | 8.6% | 1972 | $1,683 | 61.8% | 97.3% | 4.9% |
| Boulevard Park | 1.53 | 35.7 | 1.9% | 79.3% | 8.5% | 1958 | $1,809 | 63.9% | 96.1% | 5.7% |
| North Oak Park | 1.97 | 34.2 | 15.1% | 67.5% | 7.1% | 1962 | $1,820 | 49.6% | 87.2% | 4.6% |
| North City Farms | 2.79 | 36.9 | 5.9% | 35.4% | 9.0% | 1951 | $2,101 | 32.2% | 78.1% | 4.0% |
| Central Oak Park | 2.56 | 35.9 | 12.3% | 63.4% | 11.4% | 1951 | $1,597 | 39.3% | 85.7% | 10.8% |
All figures 2020–24.
Neighborhoods with similar populations: Brandywine, Broomfield, CO · Belding Woods, Richmond, CA · Belevedere, San Bernardino, CA · Belle Vista, Youngstown, OH · Berea, Baltimore, MD · Berkshire Lakes, Naples, FL · Bingham, Springfield, MO · Bishops Corner, West Hartford, CT · Boulevard Bluffs, Everett, WA · Alta Vista-Waco, Waco, TX
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Upper Land Park. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.