Population 7,135 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Vintage: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Vintage
Household size in Vintage
| Period | Vintage | Napa | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.71 | 2.63 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.66 | 2.75 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.97 | 2.83 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.68 | 2.65 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.03 | +0.02 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
At 2.68 people per household, Vintage sits close to the national average of 2.65. Household size has barely moved since 2006–10, while the national average fell.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Vintage
| Period | Vintage | Napa | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 39.7 | 40.4 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 44.0 | 39.4 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 40.8 | 41.1 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 43.7 | 43.2 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +3.9 | +2.8 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Vintage skews older than the country: its median age is 43.7, against 40.1 nationally. That is in line with the rest of Napa. The median age has climbed from 39.7 in 2006–10, in line with the national trend.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Vintage
| Period | Vintage | Napa | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.5% | 9.8% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 8.2% | 11.1% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 6.9% | 9.7% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.1% | 9.5% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | −4.4 pts | −0.3 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 7.1% of households in Vintage, well below the national share of 11.6%. The single-parent share has fallen 4.4 points since 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Vintage
Renters in Vintage
| Period | Vintage | Napa | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 34.0% | 37.3% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 40.4% | 42.5% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 32.8% | 38.5% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 34.9% | 38.7% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +0.9 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Just over a third of households in Vintage rent their homes (34.9%), close to the national share of 34.8%. Renters make up a smaller share here than in Napa overall (38.7%). Just over three in ten owners (31.1%) have paid off their mortgages, below the national share of 39.8%. The renter share is up 0.9 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Vintage
| Period | Vintage | Napa | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.0% | 7.9% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 6.1% | 7.7% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 8.0% | 10.2% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 7.3% | 8.8% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −0.7 pts | +0.9 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Fewer homes sit empty in Vintage than nationally: 7.3%, against 9.6% for the U.S. Since 2006–10, vacancy has edged down 0.7 points, in line with the national trend.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Vintage
| Period | Vintage | Napa | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1976 | 1970 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1977 | 1970 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1977 | 1971 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1977 | 1973 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +0 | +3 | +4 | +6 |
The typical home in Vintage was built around 1977, about the same vintage as the country's housing overall (1980). The newest homes are mostly in the east, the oldest in the south.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Vintage
| Period | Vintage | Napa | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,238 | $1,277 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,523 | $1,484 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,944 | $1,908 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $2,692 | $2,503 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$1,454 | +$1,226 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in Vintage runs $2,692 a month at the median, utilities included, well above the U.S. median of $1,571. Rent has climbed $1,454 a month since 2006–10, up 117%, faster than rents rose nationally. The typical renter here spends 35.1% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. The priciest rents are in the northwest; the most affordable are in the south.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Vintage
Bachelor's degrees in Vintage
| Period | Vintage | Napa | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 23.4% | 27.6% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 24.8% | 29.2% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 29.6% | 34.1% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 36.8% | 38.7% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +13.4 pts | +11.1 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are about as common in Vintage as nationally: 36.8% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%. The share with a degree has risen 13.4 points since 2006–10, in line with the national trend. College graduates are most concentrated in the north and least in the south.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Vintage
| Period | Vintage | Napa | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 81.8% | 79.9% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 82.4% | 80.8% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 84.7% | 83.9% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 83.7% | 84.0% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +1.9 pts | +4.0 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
About one in six adults in Vintage never finished high school, well above the national share: only 83.7% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally. Napa as a whole looks much the same. Since 2006–10, the share with a diploma has risen 1.9 points, as it has nationally.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Vintage
| Period | Vintage | Napa | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.8% | 7.8% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 6.5% | 9.3% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.0% | 4.1% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.4% | 5.2% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −2.5 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Vintage is the same as the national rate: 5.4% of the labor force. Since 2006–10, unemployment has fallen 2.5 points, in line with the national trend. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Vintage compared with nearby neighborhoods
| Neighborhood | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vintage | 2.68 | 43.7 | 7.1% | 34.9% | 7.3% | 1977 | $2,692 | 36.8% | 83.7% | 5.4% |
| Linda Vista-San Francisco | 2.35 | 50.0 | 6.3% | 25.1% | 9.2% | 1982 | $3,068 | 42.9% | 89.9% | 7.1% |
| Beard | 2.68 | 38.9 | 15.2% | 58.4% | 10.3% | 1979 | $2,442 | 29.3% | 78.9% | 2.9% |
| Browns Valley | 2.60 | 53.0 | 3.8% | 11.2% | 7.1% | 1977 | $2,988 | 53.9% | 96.2% | 4.2% |
| Central Napa | 2.60 | 38.4 | 13.6% | 58.4% | 10.7% | 1963 | $2,168 | 37.7% | 81.6% | 7.7% |
| Westwood-San Francisco | 3.29 | 35.5 | 15.7% | 49.7% | 7.7% | 1968 | $2,125 | 31.1% | 78.9% | 4.3% |
| Terrace-Shurtleff | 2.81 | 38.9 | 4.1% | 44.0% | 5.7% | 1986 | $2,600 | 38.2% | 82.0% | 5.8% |
| Flosden | 3.29 | 41.0 | 14.3% | 28.1% | 4.7% | 1976 | $2,461 | 24.3% | 86.3% | 6.6% |
| Chabot Terrace | 3.36 | 40.6 | 11.8% | 35.7% | 4.1% | 1978 | $2,686 | 22.9% | 82.0% | 7.1% |
| Harry Floyd Terrace | 2.67 | 37.8 | 14.1% | 54.6% | 6.3% | 1967 | $1,891 | 23.9% | 80.2% | 6.1% |
| Carquinez Heights | 2.38 | 34.7 | 19.8% | 44.9% | 7.1% | 1978 | $2,239 | 33.0% | 83.9% | 9.3% |
All figures 2020–24.
Neighborhoods with similar populations: Summit, Puyallup, WA · Euclid-St Paul, St. Petersburg, FL · Far North Dallas-Justin, Justin, TX · Fields Corner, Boston, MA · Finney, Grosse Pointe, MI · Friendly, Eugene, OR · Gresham-Kelly Creek, Gresham, OR · Home Gardens, Corona, CA · Marconi Plaza-Packer Park, Philadelphia, PA · Midtown St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Vintage. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.