Population 29,461 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of ZIP 00683: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in ZIP 00683
Household size in ZIP 00683
| Period | ZIP 00683 | Puerto Rico | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.98 | 3.07 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.81 | 2.93 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.61 | 2.79 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.63 | 2.54 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.35 | −0.53 | −0.03 |
Households in ZIP 00683 average 2.63 people, about the same as the country as a whole (2.65). The typical household here is bigger than in Puerto Rico overall, where it has 2.54 people. Household size has dropped from 2.98 in 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in ZIP 00683
| Period | ZIP 00683 | Puerto Rico | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 38.5 | 36.7 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 41.7 | 38.9 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 44.9 | 42.5 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 48.6 | 45.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +10.1 | +8.3 | +2.3 |
With a median age of 48.6, ZIP 00683 is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees. Since 2006–10, the median age has climbed from 38.5, a much bigger shift than nationally. The youngest areas are in the north, the oldest in the south.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in ZIP 00683
| Period | ZIP 00683 | Puerto Rico | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 15.1% | 18.1% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 13.5% | 18.1% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 12.6% | 16.6% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 14.2% | 15.6% | 11.6% |
| Change | −1.0 pts | −2.5 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are more common in ZIP 00683 than nationally: 14.2%, against 11.6%. Even so, single parents are less common here than in Puerto Rico overall (15.6%). Since 2006–10, the single-parent share has edged down 1.0 points, mirroring the country.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in ZIP 00683
Renters in ZIP 00683
| Period | ZIP 00683 | Puerto Rico | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 26.0% | 27.5% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 28.5% | 30.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 29.3% | 31.9% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 34.1% | 32.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +8.1 pts | +4.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Renting in ZIP 00683 is about as common as it is nationally: 34.1% of households rent, against 34.8%. Among homeowners, 76.0% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%. Renting is most common in the center and least common in the northeast. Since 2006–10, the renter share has risen 8.1 points, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in ZIP 00683
| Period | ZIP 00683 | Puerto Rico | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 17.6% | 15.6% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 20.5% | 18.7% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 25.6% | 22.1% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 26.1% | 19.1% | 9.6% |
| Change | +8.5 pts | +3.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 26.1% of the housing in ZIP 00683, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand. Since 2006–10, vacancy has risen 8.5 points, even as the national rate fell.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in ZIP 00683
| Period | ZIP 00683 | Puerto Rico | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1977 | 1978 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1978 | 1980 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1979 | 1980 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1979 | 1981 | 1980 |
| Change | +2 | +3 | +6 |
Homes in ZIP 00683 are about the same age as the nation's housing: the median home was built in 1979, versus 1980 nationally. ZIP 00683 has older homes than most Puerto Rico ZIP codes.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in ZIP 00683
| Period | ZIP 00683 | Puerto Rico | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $373 | $489 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $390 | $528 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $445 | $553 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $497 | $658 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$125 | +$168 | +$606 |
A typical rental in ZIP 00683 costs $497 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rents are up $125 a month from 2006–10, a 33% rise, a slower climb than the nation's. The typical renter here spends 30.1% of household income on rent, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent. The priciest rents are in the northeast; the most affordable are in the center.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in ZIP 00683
Bachelor's degrees in ZIP 00683
| Period | ZIP 00683 | Puerto Rico | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 19.6% | 21.9% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 22.3% | 24.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 23.8% | 26.3% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 25.9% | 30.2% | 35.6% |
| Change | +6.4 pts | +8.3 pts | +7.2 pts |
Just over a quarter of adults 25 and older in ZIP 00683 (25.9%) have a bachelor's degree or higher, below the national share of 35.6%. The share with a degree has risen 6.4 points since 2006–10, in line with the national trend. College graduates are most concentrated in the center and least in the northeast.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in ZIP 00683
| Period | ZIP 00683 | Puerto Rico | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 63.5% | 67.8% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 67.3% | 72.1% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 71.7% | 76.7% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 75.8% | 81.4% | 89.3% |
| Change | +12.3 pts | +13.6 pts | +4.3 pts |
Nearly a quarter of adults in ZIP 00683 never finished high school, well above the national share: only 75.8% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally. The share with a diploma is up 12.3 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in ZIP 00683
| Period | ZIP 00683 | Puerto Rico | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.1% | 16.9% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 8.2% | 18.7% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 7.4% | 16.5% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 8.9% | 10.9% | 5.4% |
| Change | −0.2 pts | −6.0 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in ZIP 00683 runs well above the national rate: 8.9% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4%. Even so, the rate is lower than in Puerto Rico overall (10.9%). Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
ZIP 00683 compared with nearby ZIP codes
| ZIP code | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 00683 | 2.63 | 48.6 | 14.2% | 34.1% | 26.1% | 1979 | $497 | 25.9% | 75.8% | 8.9% |
| ZIP 00667 | 2.64 | 47.5 | 16.2% | 30.3% | 27.7% | 1982 | $499 | 22.2% | 73.9% | 17.8% |
| ZIP 00637 | 2.76 | 44.9 | 13.3% | 23.8% | 30.2% | 1982 | $562 | 28.2% | 81.8% | 9.9% |
| ZIP 00660 | 2.47 | 50.4 | 11.6% | 28.0% | 19.7% | 1982 | $520 | 30.2% | 81.4% | 11.0% |
| ZIP 00623 | 2.50 | 46.1 | 13.8% | 23.6% | 23.3% | 1988 | $656 | 31.5% | 77.8% | 12.9% |
| ZIP 00606 | 2.76 | 49.9 | 12.9% | 20.8% | 30.1% | 1982 | $420 | 14.6% | 61.1% | 0.5% |
| ZIP 00680 | 2.35 | 46.6 | 12.2% | 47.1% | 27.1% | 1972 | $493 | 25.3% | 76.1% | 17.7% |
| ZIP 00622 | 2.39 | 47.0 | 12.5% | 28.4% | 51.1% | 1989 | $698 | 28.0% | 77.6% | 12.3% |
| ZIP 00647 | 2.37 | 48.2 | 16.1% | 27.8% | 42.0% | 1983 | $467 | 16.6% | 74.6% | 20.1% |
| ZIP 00653 | 2.21 | 47.2 | 23.7% | 32.8% | 30.6% | 1983 | $386 | 17.1% | 71.9% | 22.8% |
| ZIP 00698 | 2.50 | 47.5 | 11.5% | 27.0% | 23.9% | 1982 | $559 | 28.3% | 79.6% | 12.4% |
All figures 2020–24.
Zip codes with similar populations: 32327, FL · 55060, MN · 60035, IL · 70126, LA · 37311, TN · 33556, FL · 20008, DC · 30240, GA · 60181, IL · 32168, FL
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up ZIP 00683. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.