Population 958 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Annabella: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Annabella
Household size in Annabella
| Period | Annabella | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.10 | 3.21 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 3.16 | 3.28 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 3.20 | 3.25 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.85 | 3.11 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.25 | −0.09 | −0.03 |
Households in Annabella average 2.85 people, above the national 2.65, so families with children are more common here. Still, the typical household here is smaller than in Utah overall, where it has 3.11 people. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 3.10, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Annabella
| Period | Annabella | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 30.6 | 29.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 34.0 | 30.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 36.3 | 32.0 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 39.5 | 33.1 | 40.1 |
| Change | +8.9 | +3.2 | +2.3 |
Half of the people in Annabella are younger than 39.5 and half are older, close to the national median of 40.1. The population here is older than in Utah overall, where the median age is 33.1.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Annabella
| Period | Annabella | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.2% | 9.1% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 5.1% | 9.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 3.9% | 9.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.1% | 8.9% | 11.6% |
| Change | −1.1 pts | −0.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 2.1% of households in Annabella, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Annabella
Renters in Annabella
| Period | Annabella | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.3% | 28.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 14.3% | 30.3% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 9.4% | 29.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 5.5% | 29.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | −4.8 pts | +0.9 pts | +1.5 pts |
Annabella is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 5.5% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Nearly half of owners (48.4%) have paid off their mortgages, above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Annabella
| Period | Annabella | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.7% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 13.8% | 8.3% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 8.4% | 8.0% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 6.8% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −2.9 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is on the low side in Annabella: 6.8% of homes sit empty, against 9.6% nationally, which points to steady demand for housing. Utah as a whole looks much the same.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Annabella
| Period | Annabella | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1974 | 1984 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1976 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1978 | 1987 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1985 | 1991 | 1980 |
| Change | +11 | +8 | +6 |
Homes in Annabella are a bit newer than the national norm: the median home was built in 1985, versus 1980 across the U.S. Even so, homes here are older than in Utah as a whole, where the median home dates to 1991.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Annabella
| Period | Annabella | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $798 | $971 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $854 | $1,064 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $865 | $1,222 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $688 | $1,701 | $1,571 |
| Change | −$110 | +$729 | +$606 |
Rent in Annabella runs $688 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 21.3% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Annabella
Bachelor's degrees in Annabella
| Period | Annabella | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 21.7% | 29.7% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 21.8% | 31.2% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 26.9% | 34.3% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 36.9% | 38.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +15.2 pts | +8.6 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are about as common in Annabella as nationally: 36.9% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Annabella
| Period | Annabella | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 96.2% | 91.1% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 92.7% | 91.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 95.1% | 92.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 94.2% | 93.5% | 89.3% |
| Change | −2.0 pts | +2.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Annabella is above the national rate: 94.2% of adults have a diploma, against 89.3%. Utah as a whole looks much the same.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Annabella
| Period | Annabella | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1.2% | 5.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 4.4% | 6.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.2% | 3.6% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 0.0% | 3.5% | 5.4% |
| Change | −1.2 pts | −2.3 pts | −2.7 pts |
The survey found almost no one in Annabella out of work and looking, against 5.4% of the labor force nationally. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Annabella compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annabella | 2.85 | 39.5 | 2.1% | 5.5% | 6.8% | 1985 | $688 | 36.9% | 94.2% | 0.0% |
| Central Valley | 3.58 | 27.3 | 15.5% | 29.9% | 1.2% | 1997 | $971 | 16.0% | 92.3% | 2.3% |
| Richfield | 3.11 | 32.5 | 8.8% | 32.5% | 14.0% | 1975 | $822 | 25.0% | 93.1% | 3.0% |
| Elsinore | 2.47 | 47.2 | 6.0% | 8.8% | 10.3% | 1976 | $683 | 13.3% | 93.5% | 6.6% |
| Glenwood | 2.85 | 39.5 | 2.1% | 5.6% | 7.4% | 1985 | $691 | 36.6% | 94.2% | 0.0% |
| Monroe | 2.73 | 41.2 | 3.7% | 18.1% | 11.2% | 1985 | $887 | 24.9% | 91.1% | 5.1% |
| Venice | 2.97 | 37.2 | 1.9% | 19.4% | 38.6% | 1980 | $813 | 17.5% | 91.0% | 1.8% |
| Joseph | 3.40 | 37.0 | 12.9% | 20.2% | 18.3% | 1980 | $947 | 19.4% | 91.9% | 4.7% |
| Sigurd | 2.87 | 37.3 | 1.4% | 14.3% | 44.6% | 1985 | $883 | 17.6% | 91.3% | 2.8% |
| Koosharem | 2.87 | 37.7 | 1.5% | 14.5% | 44.5% | 1985 | $885 | 17.6% | 91.1% | 2.9% |
| Aurora | 2.92 | 43.5 | 5.6% | 6.3% | 12.8% | 1980 | $890 | 24.3% | 96.4% | 1.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Old Field, NY · Little Texas, AL · Reeve, WI · Morley, MO · Prospect, OR · Five Forks, VA · Brownsville, MS · Sunshine, NM · Popcorn, IN · Benton, CA
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Annabella. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.