Population 527 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Cedar Glen: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Cedar Glen
Household size in Cedar Glen
| Period | Cedar Glen | Riverside area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.16 | 3.35 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 3.07 | 3.43 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.62 | 3.42 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.39 | 3.34 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.23 | −0.01 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Households in Cedar Glen are small: just 2.39 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.16, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Cedar Glen
| Period | Cedar Glen | Riverside area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 54.0 | 33.6 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 45.6 | 34.6 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 41.3 | 35.9 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 43.4 | 37.0 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | −10.5 | +3.4 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Cedar Glen skews older than the country: its median age is 43.4, against 40.1 nationally.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Cedar Glen
| Period | Cedar Glen | Riverside area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.9% | 15.2% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 10.1% | 15.7% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 9.9% | 14.4% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 11.8% | 14.8% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | +2.9 pts | −0.3 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are about as common in Cedar Glen as they are nationally: 11.8%, against 11.6%. Single parents are less common here than in the wider Riverside area (14.8%).
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Cedar Glen
Renters in Cedar Glen
| Period | Cedar Glen | Riverside area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 14.2% | 32.3% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 41.2% | 36.6% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 23.0% | 36.7% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 15.3% | 34.2% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +1.1 pts | +1.9 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 15.3% of households in Cedar Glen rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. About a quarter of owners (25.2%) have paid off their mortgages, well below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Cedar Glen
| Period | Cedar Glen | Riverside area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 73.4% | 11.8% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 69.5% | 10.9% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 67.0% | 9.4% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 60.7% | 7.8% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −12.8 pts | −4.0 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 60.7% of the housing in Cedar Glen, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Cedar Glen
| Period | Cedar Glen | Riverside area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1971 | 1983 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1964 | 1984 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1967 | 1984 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1977 | 1986 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +6 | +3 | +4 | +6 |
Homes in Cedar Glen are about the same age as the nation's housing: the median home was built in 1977, versus 1980 nationally. Homes here are older than in the wider Riverside area, where the median home dates to 1986.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Cedar Glen
| Period | Cedar Glen | Riverside area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,410 | $1,287 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,245 | $1,332 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $2,271 | $1,549 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,345 | $2,083 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | −$66 | +$796 | +$931 | +$606 |
The median renter in Cedar Glen pays $1,345 a month for rent and utilities, below the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 18.0% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Cedar Glen
Bachelor's degrees in Cedar Glen
| Period | Cedar Glen | Riverside area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 52.1% | 19.2% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 34.2% | 19.4% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 27.3% | 21.2% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 27.5% | 24.0% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | −24.6 pts | +4.8 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are less common in Cedar Glen than nationally: 27.5% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%. Still, the share is higher than in the Riverside area as a whole (24.0%).
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Cedar Glen
| Period | Cedar Glen | Riverside area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 90.5% | 77.9% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 93.3% | 78.6% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 86.8% | 80.6% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 96.7% | 82.5% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +6.2 pts | +4.6 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion is high in Cedar Glen: 96.7% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Cedar Glen
| Period | Cedar Glen | Riverside area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.2% | 11.4% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 3.3% | 14.4% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 15.3% | 7.7% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.1% | 6.8% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −0.0 pts | −4.6 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Cedar Glen is close to the national rate: 5.1% of the labor force, against 5.4%. The rate is lower than in the Riverside area as a whole (6.8%). Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Cedar Glen compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Glen | 2.39 | 43.4 | 11.8% | 15.3% | 60.7% | 1977 | $1,345 | 27.5% | 96.7% | 5.1% |
| Skyforest | 2.04 | 56.2 | 5.6% | 20.4% | 64.4% | 1978 | $1,714 | 44.9% | 88.4% | 16.4% |
| Lake Arrowhead | 2.43 | 52.2 | 7.3% | 12.6% | 64.3% | 1979 | $2,179 | 43.4% | 95.1% | 4.9% |
| Crest Park | 3.88 | 32.1 | 11.1% | 28.1% | 65.5% | 1973 | $2,615 | 34.9% | 98.0% | 0.1% |
| Blue Jay | 2.21 | 45.3 | 9.7% | 18.1% | 70.0% | 1980 | $1,805 | 41.0% | 84.5% | 0.2% |
| Twin Peaks | 2.33 | 40.2 | 11.4% | 23.8% | 42.2% | 1971 | $2,233 | 26.6% | 97.7% | 2.4% |
| Rimforest | 2.48 | 40.3 | 10.2% | 16.5% | 38.0% | 1966 | $1,991 | 29.8% | 91.8% | 5.2% |
| Running Springs | 2.59 | 39.8 | 15.7% | 26.0% | 44.9% | 1973 | $1,693 | 32.5% | 95.1% | 6.1% |
| Green Valley Lake | 2.58 | 43.9 | 17.6% | 24.2% | 83.9% | 1962 | $2,001 | 20.4% | 93.6% | 16.6% |
| Smiley Park | 3.12 | 34.8 | 10.4% | 11.4% | 45.5% | 1972 | $1,511 | 37.0% | 100.0% | 12.9% |
| Crestline | 2.54 | 44.3 | 8.9% | 24.8% | 40.4% | 1965 | $1,610 | 28.9% | 90.0% | 7.7% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Wayne, MO · Ehrenberg, AZ · Delaware Water Gap, PA · Daviston, AL · Crimcrest, TX · Vienna, MD · Cocolamus, PA · Marquez, TX · Chocorua, NH · Nichols, WI
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Cedar Glen. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.