Population 10,639 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Cedar Hills: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Cedar Hills
Household size in Cedar Hills
| Period | Cedar Hills | Provo area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.17 | 3.64 | 3.21 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 4.07 | 3.76 | 3.28 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 4.12 | 3.67 | 3.25 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 3.85 | 3.51 | 3.11 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.32 | −0.13 | −0.09 | −0.03 |
Cedar Hills is a place of big households: 3.85 people per home on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. Numbers like that usually point to plenty of families with kids. Household size has dropped from 4.17 in 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally. Of the 93 Utah cities with 5,000+ people, only two have larger households.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Cedar Hills
| Period | Cedar Hills | Provo area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 22.9 | 25.1 | 29.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 24.1 | 25.4 | 30.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 25.5 | 26.3 | 32.0 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 30.2 | 27.4 | 33.1 | 40.1 |
| Change | +7.3 | +2.3 | +3.2 | +2.3 |
With a median age of just 30.2, Cedar Hills is far younger than the country as a whole (40.1), a population that tilts toward young families with children. Even so, the population here is older than in the wider Provo area, where the median age is 27.4. Since 2006–10, the median age has climbed from 22.9, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Cedar Hills
| Period | Cedar Hills | Provo area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.5% | 7.5% | 9.1% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 7.6% | 7.9% | 9.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 8.6% | 7.3% | 9.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 4.5% | 7.3% | 8.9% | 11.6% |
| Change | −3.0 pts | −0.2 pts | −0.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 4.5% of households in Cedar Hills, well below the national share of 11.6%. The single-parent share has fallen 3.0 points since 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally. Cedar Hills has a lower share of single-parent households than at least four in five Utah cities.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Cedar Hills
Renters in Cedar Hills
| Period | Cedar Hills | Provo area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.8% | 30.3% | 28.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 13.1% | 32.4% | 30.3% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 12.2% | 32.1% | 29.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 11.0% | 31.4% | 29.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | +4.3 pts | +1.1 pts | +0.9 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 11.0% of households in Cedar Hills rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 28.5% have no mortgage at all, well below the national share of 39.8%. Renting is most common in the northeast and least common in the northwest. The renter share is up 4.3 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Cedar Hills
| Period | Cedar Hills | Provo area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.9% | 7.1% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 7.0% | 5.7% | 8.3% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 3.2% | 5.5% | 8.0% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 3.4% | 5.2% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −1.5 pts | −2.0 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Empty homes are scarce in Cedar Hills: just 3.4% sit vacant, compared with 9.6% nationally, a sign of a tight housing market. Since 2006–10, vacancy has fallen 1.5 points, as it has nationally. Cedar Hills has a lower vacancy rate than at least four in five Utah cities.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Cedar Hills
| Period | Cedar Hills | Provo area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1999 | 1989 | 1984 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 2002 | 1990 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 2001 | 1993 | 1987 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 2002 | 2000 | 1991 | 1980 |
| Change | +3 | +10 | +8 | +6 |
Cedar Hills has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 2002, versus 1980 nationally. The Provo area as a whole looks much the same.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Cedar Hills
| Period | Cedar Hills | Provo area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,410 | $1,011 | $971 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,526 | $1,149 | $1,064 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,728 | $1,320 | $1,222 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $2,315 | $1,800 | $1,701 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$906 | +$789 | +$729 | +$606 |
The median renter in Cedar Hills pays $2,315 a month for rent and utilities, well above the national median of $1,571. Rent has climbed $906 a month since 2006–10, up 64%, roughly in step with the nation. The typical renter here spends 32.0% of household income on rent, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent. Renters on a budget will find the lowest rents in the southeast; the highest are in the north.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Cedar Hills
Bachelor's degrees in Cedar Hills
| Period | Cedar Hills | Provo area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 51.3% | 35.5% | 29.7% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 53.2% | 37.3% | 31.2% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 53.6% | 40.7% | 34.3% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 56.9% | 45.1% | 38.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +5.6 pts | +9.5 pts | +8.6 pts | +7.2 pts |
Cedar Hills is highly educated: nearly six in ten adults 25 and older (56.9%) hold at least a bachelor's degree, far above the national share of 35.6%. The share with a degree has risen 5.6 points since 2006–10, in line with the national trend. Only six of the 93 Utah cities with 5,000+ people have a higher share of college graduates.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Cedar Hills
| Period | Cedar Hills | Provo area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 98.0% | 94.1% | 91.1% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 99.0% | 94.1% | 91.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 97.9% | 94.9% | 92.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 98.2% | 95.4% | 93.5% | 89.3% |
| Change | +0.2 pts | +1.3 pts | +2.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Cedar Hills: 98.2% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%. Only four of the 93 Utah cities with 5,000+ people have a higher share of high school graduates.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Cedar Hills
| Period | Cedar Hills | Provo area | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.9% | 5.5% | 5.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 6.9% | 6.4% | 6.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 3.3% | 3.5% | 3.6% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 4.6% | 3.5% | 3.5% | 5.4% |
| Change | +1.6 pts | −1.9 pts | −2.3 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Cedar Hills runs below the national rate: 4.6% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4% nationally. Even so, the rate is higher than in the Provo area as a whole (3.5%). Since 2006–10, unemployment has risen 1.6 points, even as the national rate fell.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Cedar Hills compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedar Hills | 3.85 | 30.2 | 4.5% | 11.0% | 3.4% | 2002 | $2,315 | 56.9% | 98.2% | 4.6% |
| Highland | 3.94 | 28.5 | 6.3% | 8.6% | 4.1% | 2003 | $2,523 | 63.3% | 98.3% | 3.5% |
| American Fork | 3.19 | 28.5 | 5.7% | 33.0% | 5.8% | 1997 | $1,711 | 44.6% | 95.2% | 2.7% |
| Alpine | 3.43 | 36.7 | 2.8% | 10.5% | 6.3% | 1999 | $2,723 | 55.9% | 98.6% | 1.8% |
| Pleasant Grove | 3.37 | 30.5 | 8.4% | 34.1% | 5.6% | 1993 | $1,834 | 41.9% | 95.5% | 2.9% |
| Lindon | 3.47 | 31.9 | 10.1% | 19.8% | 3.7% | 1998 | $1,637 | 49.3% | 96.0% | 4.2% |
| Lehi | 3.48 | 26.4 | 5.8% | 25.5% | 3.4% | 2010 | $2,055 | 52.9% | 97.6% | 3.6% |
| Vineyard | 3.24 | 25.4 | 7.3% | 51.5% | 1.8% | 2015 | $2,066 | 49.4% | 95.9% | 2.3% |
| Orem | 3.10 | 28.3 | 7.6% | 42.3% | 6.0% | 1988 | $1,613 | 43.5% | 94.4% | 4.1% |
| Draper | 2.98 | 35.2 | 6.0% | 31.4% | 3.4% | 2003 | $2,174 | 52.5% | 97.4% | 2.4% |
| Saratoga Springs | 3.81 | 24.6 | 6.7% | 17.9% | 5.5% | 2014 | $2,269 | 51.8% | 98.1% | 2.7% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Mentone, CA · Jacinto City, TX · Antigo, WI · Sausalito, CA · Yorkshire, VA · Wytheville, VA · Athol, MA · Mendham, NJ · Avon, CO · Jarrell, TX
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Cedar Hills. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.