Population 406 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Cedarhill: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Cedarhill
Household size in Cedarhill
| Period | Cedarhill | Columbus area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.82 | 2.56 | 2.51 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.75 | 2.59 | 2.51 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.77 | 2.60 | 2.47 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.62 | 2.56 | 2.46 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.21 | +0.00 | −0.05 | −0.03 |
Households in Cedarhill average 2.62 people, about the same as the country as a whole (2.65). Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.82, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Cedarhill
| Period | Cedarhill | Columbus area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 47.2 | 36.2 | 39.0 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 42.0 | 37.0 | 40.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 43.6 | 37.6 | 40.7 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 42.8 | 37.9 | 40.8 | 40.1 |
| Change | −4.3 | +1.7 | +1.8 | +2.3 |
Cedarhill skews older than the country: its median age is 42.8, against 40.1 nationally.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Cedarhill
| Period | Cedarhill | Columbus area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.8% | 12.0% | 11.7% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 12.1% | 12.1% | 11.9% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 7.1% | 12.3% | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 12.6% | 12.7% | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | +3.8 pts | +0.7 pts | −0.0 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head about one in eight households in Cedarhill (12.6%), a bit above the national share of 11.6%. The picture is much the same across the Columbus area.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Cedarhill
Renters in Cedarhill
| Period | Cedarhill | Columbus area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.4% | 35.4% | 30.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 20.1% | 37.9% | 33.1% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 16.2% | 38.5% | 33.9% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 12.7% | 38.7% | 32.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | +1.3 pts | +3.3 pts | +2.0 pts | +1.5 pts |
Cedarhill is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 12.7% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Nearly four in ten owners (38.2%) have paid off their mortgages, about the same as nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Cedarhill
| Period | Cedarhill | Columbus area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.4% | 10.9% | 10.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 6.0% | 10.0% | 10.8% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 5.9% | 8.8% | 10.2% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 2.8% | 7.9% | 8.7% | 9.6% |
| Change | −3.5 pts | −2.9 pts | −2.2 pts | −1.8 pts |
Only 2.8% of homes in Cedarhill are vacant, far below the national rate of 9.6%, which usually means strong demand for housing.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Cedarhill
| Period | Cedarhill | Columbus area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1971 | 1976 | 1968 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1974 | 1977 | 1969 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1988 | 1979 | 1970 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1978 | 1982 | 1972 | 1980 |
| Change | +7 | +6 | +4 | +6 |
The typical home in Cedarhill was built around 1978, about the same vintage as the country's housing overall (1980). Homes here are older than in the Columbus area overall, where the median home dates to 1982.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Cedarhill
| Period | Cedarhill | Columbus area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $788 | $852 | $765 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $773 | $924 | $814 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $702 | $1,051 | $901 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,314 | $1,378 | $1,142 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$526 | +$526 | +$377 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Cedarhill costs $1,314 a month with utilities, below the national median of $1,571. The picture is much the same across the Columbus area. Rent takes 39.2% of the typical renter's income, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Cedarhill
Bachelor's degrees in Cedarhill
| Period | Cedarhill | Columbus area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.4% | 33.3% | 25.4% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 26.6% | 34.4% | 26.5% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 29.7% | 37.6% | 28.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 21.6% | 40.2% | 31.9% | 35.6% |
| Change | +1.2 pts | +6.9 pts | +6.5 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Cedarhill have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 21.6%, against 35.6% nationally.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Cedarhill
| Period | Cedarhill | Columbus area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 93.1% | 89.6% | 87.7% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 96.8% | 90.2% | 88.9% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 94.8% | 91.6% | 90.4% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 96.8% | 92.2% | 91.7% | 89.3% |
| Change | +3.7 pts | +2.6 pts | +4.0 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion is high in Cedarhill: 96.8% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Cedarhill
| Period | Cedarhill | Columbus area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.9% | 7.6% | 8.7% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 0.0% | 7.8% | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 0.0% | 4.6% | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.9% | 4.3% | 4.9% | 5.4% |
| Change | −3.0 pts | −3.4 pts | −3.8 pts | −2.7 pts |
Jobs have been easier to find in Cedarhill than nationally: unemployment was 3.9%, against 5.4%. That is in line with the rest of the Columbus area. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Cedarhill compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedarhill | 2.62 | 42.8 | 12.6% | 12.7% | 2.8% | 1978 | $1,314 | 21.6% | 96.8% | 3.9% |
| Royalton | 2.72 | 45.8 | 13.2% | 12.2% | 3.1% | 1984 | $1,243 | 27.9% | 97.7% | 2.0% |
| East Ringgold | 3.07 | 38.6 | 4.8% | 5.1% | 2.3% | 1971 | $1,254 | 33.2% | 93.3% | 4.2% |
| New Strasburg | 2.56 | 48.6 | 8.8% | 8.2% | 1.6% | 1987 | $1,364 | 23.5% | 90.6% | 1.9% |
| Amanda | 2.79 | 41.4 | 11.1% | 11.6% | 6.2% | 1987 | $1,182 | 19.8% | 91.8% | 4.0% |
| Stoutsville | 2.75 | 44.3 | 19.6% | 8.0% | 5.5% | 1982 | $1,181 | 27.2% | 89.9% | 4.0% |
| St. Paul | 2.67 | 44.6 | 10.1% | 26.4% | 2.7% | 1996 | $1,101 | 20.3% | 89.6% | 0.9% |
| Greencastle | 3.65 | 38.9 | 15.5% | 7.5% | 2.9% | 1987 | $1,129 | 44.4% | 99.8% | 3.6% |
| Delmont | 2.27 | 59.2 | 2.7% | 21.1% | 5.5% | 1976 | $910 | 21.3% | 93.8% | 0.6% |
| Knollwood Village | 2.83 | 37.8 | 6.4% | 6.4% | 4.7% | 1981 | $1,073 | 30.9% | 95.2% | 0.8% |
| Lithopolis | 2.95 | 40.7 | 4.4% | 15.5% | 2.8% | 1997 | $1,848 | 41.7% | 96.1% | 2.4% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Stiles Junction, WI · Eckley, CO · Edwardsville, IN · Thida, AR · Temperance, GA · Ellenburg, NY · Tea, MO · Tangier, VA · Sylvester, WV · Emory, SC
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Cedarhill. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.