Population 8,906 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Chandler: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Chandler
Household size in Chandler
| Period | Chandler | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.67 | 2.87 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.46 | 2.93 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.50 | 2.95 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.35 | 2.83 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.32 | −0.05 | −0.03 |
Households in Chandler are small: just 2.35 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.67, a much bigger shift than nationally. Only 34 of the 545 Texas cities with 5,000+ people have smaller households.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Chandler
| Period | Chandler | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 44.1 | 34.7 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 45.8 | 35.4 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 48.2 | 36.1 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 50.0 | 36.7 | 40.1 |
| Change | +5.9 | +2.0 | +2.3 |
Chandler skews older: half of its residents are older than 50.0, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families. The median age has climbed from 44.1 in 2006–10, in line with the national trend. Of the 545 Texas cities with 5,000+ people, only eight are older.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Chandler
| Period | Chandler | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.9% | 13.7% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 10.1% | 13.7% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 7.7% | 13.1% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.8% | 12.9% | 11.6% |
| Change | −3.1 pts | −0.8 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 5.8% of households in Chandler, well below the national share of 11.6%. The single-parent share is down 3.1 points from 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally. Only 36 of the 545 Texas cities with 5,000+ people have a lower share of single-parent households.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Chandler
Renters in Chandler
| Period | Chandler | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 15.3% | 35.2% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 17.8% | 37.3% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 23.2% | 38.0% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 18.0% | 37.4% | 34.8% |
| Change | +2.7 pts | +2.3 pts | +1.5 pts |
Chandler is largely a place of homeowners: only 18.0% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Among homeowners, 57.8% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%. The renter share is up 2.7 points from 2006–10, in line with the national trend.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Chandler
| Period | Chandler | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 19.1% | 11.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 20.5% | 10.9% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 17.0% | 10.9% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 19.5% | 9.4% | 9.6% |
| Change | +0.4 pts | −2.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Chandler: 19.5% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand. Of the 545 Texas cities with 5,000+ people, only 45 have a higher vacancy rate.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Chandler
| Period | Chandler | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1988 | 1983 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1989 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1990 | 1987 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1993 | 1992 | 1980 |
| Change | +5 | +8 | +6 |
Chandler has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1993, versus 1980 nationally. That is in line with the rest of Texas. The median year built has moved up from 1988 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Chandler
| Period | Chandler | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $680 | $921 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $722 | $1,005 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $769 | $1,178 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,146 | $1,560 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$466 | +$639 | +$606 |
Rent in Chandler runs $1,146 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. Rents are up $466 a month from 2006–10, a 69% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. The typical renter here spends 33.6% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. Rents run highest in the center and lowest in the northeast.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Chandler
Bachelor's degrees in Chandler
| Period | Chandler | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 18.5% | 27.0% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 22.0% | 27.9% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 17.5% | 30.0% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 21.0% | 34.0% | 35.6% |
| Change | +2.5 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Chandler have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 21.0%, against 35.6% nationally. The share with a degree is up 2.5 points from 2006–10, in line with the national trend. College graduates are most concentrated in the east and least in the center.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Chandler
| Period | Chandler | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 85.2% | 80.7% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 89.0% | 82.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 86.2% | 83.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 90.0% | 85.8% | 89.3% |
| Change | +4.9 pts | +5.1 pts | +4.3 pts |
About as many adults in Chandler have finished high school as nationally: 90.0%, against 89.3%. The rate is higher than in Texas overall (85.8%). Since 2006–10, the share with a diploma has risen 4.9 points, in line with the national trend.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Chandler
| Period | Chandler | Texas | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.5% | 7.0% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 6.6% | 7.7% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 5.9% | 5.1% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.5% | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Change | +0.0 pts | −1.7 pts | −2.7 pts |
Finding work has been harder in Chandler: 7.5% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well above the national rate of 5.4%. Chandler has higher unemployment than at least four in five Texas cities. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Chandler compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chandler | 2.35 | 50.0 | 5.8% | 18.0% | 19.5% | 1993 | $1,146 | 21.0% | 90.0% | 7.5% |
| Noonday | 2.80 | 46.2 | 9.2% | 12.8% | 21.4% | 1997 | $1,356 | 35.9% | 95.1% | 2.2% |
| Brownsboro | 2.80 | 40.0 | 9.0% | 25.0% | 6.4% | 1996 | $1,074 | 23.3% | 93.2% | 2.3% |
| Moore Station | 2.37 | 54.9 | 5.2% | 6.0% | 35.1% | 1982 | $853 | 9.3% | 92.8% | 4.0% |
| Flint | 3.07 | 40.3 | 6.2% | 12.7% | 12.1% | 2000 | $1,483 | 40.7% | 96.3% | 3.2% |
| Redland | 2.66 | 49.8 | 15.1% | 29.7% | 10.5% | 1996 | $1,023 | 24.3% | 87.2% | 4.8% |
| Poynor | 2.48 | 54.4 | 8.6% | 7.7% | 25.5% | 1990 | $988 | 19.6% | 94.4% | 3.4% |
| Coffee City | 2.46 | 50.8 | 6.6% | 7.2% | 13.2% | 1991 | $745 | 24.0% | 94.1% | 1.5% |
| Teaselville | 2.50 | 40.9 | 11.1% | 23.1% | 12.2% | 2004 | $1,280 | 30.8% | 95.1% | 1.4% |
| Edom | 3.09 | 36.6 | 7.3% | 23.4% | 5.0% | 1998 | $844 | 15.2% | 80.1% | 1.7% |
| Shadybrook | 2.97 | 36.9 | 7.9% | 26.2% | 25.4% | 2004 | $1,167 | 25.3% | 94.3% | 0.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Littleton, MA · Laurel, FL · Lawrence, NY · Lebanon, KY · Sumrall, MS · Ledyard, CT · Leechburg, PA · Leonia, NJ · Libby, MT · Lincoln, AL
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Chandler. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.