Population 753 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Chatham: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Chatham
Household size in Chatham
| Period | Chatham | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.21 | 2.58 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.42 | 2.58 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.52 | 2.53 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.48 | 2.51 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.27 | −0.06 | −0.03 |
Households in Chatham run small, averaging 2.48 people against 2.65 nationally, which usually means more singles and couples and fewer children. The picture is much the same across Michigan. Household size has climbed from 2.21 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Chatham
| Period | Chatham | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 49.8 | 38.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 52.5 | 40.1 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 57.5 | 41.0 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 52.9 | 41.3 | 40.1 |
| Change | +3.0 | +2.4 | +2.3 |
Chatham skews older: half of its residents are older than 52.9, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Chatham
| Period | Chatham | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.1% | 11.3% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 4.7% | 11.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 6.1% | 10.9% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.4% | 10.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | −0.7 pts | −0.6 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Chatham: 5.4% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Chatham
Renters in Chatham
| Period | Chatham | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.1% | 25.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 10.1% | 28.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 9.0% | 28.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 4.4% | 26.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | −3.7 pts | +1.0 pts | +1.5 pts |
Chatham is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 4.4% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Among homeowners, 46.1% have no mortgage at all, above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Chatham
| Period | Chatham | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 42.9% | 13.0% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 43.6% | 13.0% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 55.6% | 11.9% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 40.0% | 10.2% | 9.6% |
| Change | −3.0 pts | −2.8 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 40.0% of the housing in Chatham, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Chatham
| Period | Chatham | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1970 | 1969 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1970 | 1970 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1978 | 1971 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1975 | 1972 | 1980 |
| Change | +5 | +3 | +6 |
Housing in Chatham leans a little older: the median home dates to 1975, against 1980 nationally. Michigan as a whole looks much the same.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Chatham
| Period | Chatham | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $533 | $833 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $576 | $886 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $812 | $978 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $632 | $1,228 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$99 | +$395 | +$606 |
The median renter in Chatham pays $632 a month for rent and utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rent takes 34.3% of the typical renter's income, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Chatham
Bachelor's degrees in Chatham
| Period | Chatham | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.8% | 26.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 17.5% | 27.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 18.6% | 29.5% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 26.6% | 32.7% | 35.6% |
| Change | +5.8 pts | +6.6 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are less common in Chatham than nationally: 26.6% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Chatham
| Period | Chatham | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 90.4% | 88.3% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 91.3% | 89.3% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 93.2% | 90.7% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 95.3% | 91.8% | 89.3% |
| Change | +4.9 pts | +3.5 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion is high in Chatham: 95.3% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Chatham
| Period | Chatham | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.4% | 11.5% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 11.4% | 11.7% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.4% | 6.1% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 6.6% | 5.9% | 5.4% |
| Change | −2.7 pts | −5.7 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment runs a little high in Chatham: 6.6% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4% nationally. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Chatham compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chatham | 2.48 | 52.9 | 5.4% | 4.4% | 40.0% | 1975 | $632 | 26.6% | 95.3% | 6.6% |
| Slapneck | 2.54 | 51.3 | 5.8% | 3.3% | 36.6% | 1974 | $598 | 27.3% | 95.3% | 6.5% |
| Eben Junction | 2.51 | 52.9 | 5.5% | 4.0% | 38.3% | 1974 | $627 | 27.3% | 95.4% | 6.7% |
| Rumely | 2.40 | 56.5 | 4.7% | 6.6% | 43.4% | 1976 | $700 | 27.5% | 96.0% | 7.2% |
| Traunik | 2.70 | 45.8 | 7.1% | 0.4% | 29.8% | 1972 | $485 | 26.2% | 94.2% | 5.6% |
| Au Train | 2.29 | 54.7 | 4.0% | 10.2% | 44.5% | 1971 | $729 | 33.0% | 97.6% | 7.8% |
| Dixon | 2.24 | 38.5 | 7.1% | 4.8% | 58.4% | 1977 | $488 | 11.7% | 90.3% | 2.9% |
| Ladoga | 2.59 | 41.2 | 10.9% | 3.7% | 22.9% | 1975 | $1,136 | 38.5% | 94.7% | 7.2% |
| Limestone | 2.32 | 42.9 | 6.3% | 4.1% | 51.2% | 1976 | $495 | 15.5% | 91.8% | 3.3% |
| Lawson | 2.57 | 42.9 | 10.1% | 3.8% | 25.1% | 1975 | $1,067 | 37.0% | 94.8% | 7.1% |
| Trenary | 2.44 | 45.1 | 6.6% | 2.8% | 41.4% | 1975 | $540 | 19.0% | 92.5% | 4.7% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Dowell, IL · Galesville, MD · Pomeroy, IA · Union, IA · Postville, WI · Pridgen, GA · Purley, TX · Quenemo, KS · Velma, MS · Randlett, OK
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Chatham. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.