Population 38,295 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Claremont: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Claremont
Household size in Claremont
| Period | Claremont | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.64 | 3.14 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.67 | 3.20 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.63 | 3.16 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.57 | 3.01 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.06 | −0.13 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Households in Claremont average 2.57 people, about the same as the country as a whole (2.65). The typical household here is smaller than in the Los Angeles area as a whole, where it has 3.01 people. Since 2006–10, household size has edged down from 2.64, in line with the national trend.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Claremont
| Period | Claremont | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 39.4 | 35.6 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 41.3 | 36.7 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 41.4 | 38.0 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 40.9 | 39.5 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +1.5 | +4.0 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
At 40.9, the median age in Claremont is close to the national median of 40.1, so its age mix looks much like the country's. The median age has climbed from 39.4 in 2006–10, mirroring the country. The youngest areas are in the east, the oldest in the west.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Claremont
| Period | Claremont | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.1% | 14.3% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 6.3% | 14.1% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 7.8% | 12.5% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 9.4% | 12.3% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | −0.7 pts | −2.0 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head about one in ten households in Claremont (9.4%), below the national share of 11.6%. Since 2006–10, the single-parent share has edged down 0.7 points, mirroring the country.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Claremont
Renters in Claremont
| Period | Claremont | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 32.9% | 48.8% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 33.8% | 50.8% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 35.7% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 36.5% | 51.6% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +3.6 pts | +2.8 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Renting in Claremont is about as common as it is nationally: 36.5% of households rent, against 34.8%. Renters make up a smaller share here than in the Los Angeles area as a whole (51.6%). Among homeowners, 29.1% have no mortgage at all, well below the national share of 39.8%. The renter share is up 3.6 points from 2006–10, as it has nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Claremont
| Period | Claremont | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.0% | 7.0% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 9.5% | 6.7% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 8.3% | 6.6% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 12.2% | 6.7% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +6.1 pts | −0.3 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
A few more homes sit empty in Claremont than nationally: 12.2%, against 9.6%. The count includes vacation homes and homes between owners or tenants, not just abandoned ones. Vacancy has risen 6.1 points since 2006–10, even as the national rate fell.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Claremont
| Period | Claremont | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1968 | 1965 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1965 | 1966 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1964 | 1966 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1963 | 1969 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | −5 | +4 | +4 | +6 |
Claremont is a place of older homes: half were built before 1963, while the national median is 1980. That means established neighborhoods, and more houses that may need updating. The newest homes are mostly in the northeast, the oldest in the southeast.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Claremont
| Period | Claremont | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,337 | $1,328 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,477 | $1,415 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,792 | $1,755 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $2,305 | $2,279 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$968 | +$951 | +$931 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Claremont costs $2,305 a month with utilities, well above the national median of $1,571. Rents are up $968 a month from 2006–10, a 72% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. The typical renter here spends 31.8% of household income on rent, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent. Renters on a budget will find the lowest rents in the east; the highest are in the north.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Claremont
Bachelor's degrees in Claremont
| Period | Claremont | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 51.9% | 29.7% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 54.2% | 30.7% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 53.5% | 33.7% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 60.1% | 37.6% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +8.2 pts | +7.9 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
Claremont is highly educated: about six in ten adults 25 and older (60.1%) hold at least a bachelor's degree, far above the national share of 35.6%. The share with a degree is up 8.2 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country. College graduates are most concentrated in the north and least in the south.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Claremont
| Period | Claremont | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 92.8% | 76.7% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 92.0% | 77.7% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 94.0% | 80.0% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 94.3% | 82.1% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +1.5 pts | +5.4 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion is high in Claremont: 94.3% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%. The share with a diploma has edged up 1.5 points since 2006–10, as it has nationally.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Claremont
| Period | Claremont | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.4% | 8.5% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 9.7% | 10.6% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 5.7% | 5.8% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.3% | 6.7% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −2.1 pts | −1.7 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Claremont is close to the national rate: 5.3% of the labor force, against 5.4%. The rate is lower than in the Los Angeles area overall (6.7%). Since 2006–10, unemployment has fallen 2.1 points, mirroring the country.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Claremont compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claremont | 2.57 | 40.9 | 9.4% | 36.5% | 12.2% | 1963 | $2,305 | 60.1% | 94.3% | 5.3% |
| Montclair | 3.57 | 33.9 | 17.8% | 46.0% | 4.4% | 1971 | $1,853 | 18.1% | 73.7% | 6.1% |
| La Verne | 2.68 | 46.6 | 8.1% | 30.5% | 6.2% | 1975 | $2,725 | 42.9% | 93.1% | 5.9% |
| Upland | 2.91 | 40.5 | 12.9% | 41.2% | 4.3% | 1977 | $2,301 | 38.2% | 91.2% | 5.2% |
| Pomona | 3.52 | 36.9 | 16.1% | 45.8% | 5.0% | 1967 | $1,976 | 19.5% | 72.7% | 6.4% |
| San Dimas | 2.82 | 41.0 | 12.5% | 27.4% | 4.0% | 1973 | $2,550 | 39.3% | 92.9% | 5.3% |
| Ontario | 3.43 | 34.5 | 16.8% | 42.0% | 5.5% | 1981 | $2,197 | 24.2% | 79.0% | 5.8% |
| Chino | 3.33 | 37.3 | 13.1% | 35.5% | 5.1% | 1988 | $2,350 | 27.9% | 86.3% | 6.6% |
| Glendora | 3.02 | 41.3 | 9.6% | 32.1% | 5.4% | 1966 | $2,518 | 38.6% | 92.6% | 5.7% |
| Alta Loma | 3.02 | 46.6 | 7.3% | 22.5% | 4.8% | 1984 | $2,607 | 41.4% | 94.3% | 5.7% |
| Rancho Cucamonga | 3.00 | 38.7 | 10.3% | 40.0% | 4.8% | 1990 | $2,557 | 37.6% | 91.2% | 5.6% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Woburn, MA · Villa Rica, GA · Belton, TX · Long Beach, NY · Braintree Town, MA · Calexico, CA · Calhoun, GA · Canal Winchester, OH · Oswego, IL · Ringgold, GA
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Claremont. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.