Population 13,182 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Clayton: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Clayton
Household size in Clayton
| Period | Clayton | San Francisco area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.80 | 2.74 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.66 | 2.79 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.86 | 2.83 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.80 | 2.75 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.01 | +0.01 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Households in Clayton average 2.80 people, a bit above the national 2.65, so families with children are somewhat more common here. That is in line with the rest of the San Francisco area.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Clayton
| Period | Clayton | San Francisco area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 43.6 | 38.6 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 46.9 | 39.4 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 46.7 | 40.1 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 43.0 | 41.3 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | −0.6 | +2.7 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Clayton skews older than the country: its median age is 43.0, against 40.1 nationally. The median age has edged down from 43.6 in 2006–10, even as the national median rose. Residents skew youngest in the southeast and oldest in the center.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Clayton
| Period | Clayton | San Francisco area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.6% | 10.3% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 6.1% | 9.9% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 4.8% | 9.1% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 10.8% | 8.8% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | +3.2 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head just over one in ten households in Clayton (10.8%), close to the national share of 11.6%. Single parents are more common here than in the wider San Francisco area (8.8%). The single-parent share is up 3.2 points from 2006–10, even as the national share fell.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Clayton
Renters in Clayton
| Period | Clayton | San Francisco area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.0% | 43.7% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 8.9% | 46.2% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 8.3% | 45.3% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 12.6% | 44.5% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +3.6 pts | +0.8 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Clayton is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 12.6% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. About a quarter of owners (24.7%) have paid off their mortgages, well below the national share of 39.8%. The renter share has risen 3.6 points since 2006–10, mirroring the country.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Clayton
| Period | Clayton | San Francisco area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.8% | 8.6% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 5.6% | 7.1% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.8% | 6.5% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 1.9% | 7.5% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −5.9 pts | −1.1 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Only 1.9% of homes in Clayton are vacant, far below the national rate of 9.6%, which usually means strong demand for housing. Vacancy is down 5.9 points from 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally. Of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people, only two have a lower vacancy rate.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Clayton
| Period | Clayton | San Francisco area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1981 | 1964 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1982 | 1965 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1981 | 1966 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1981 | 1968 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | −0 | +4 | +4 | +6 |
The typical home in Clayton was built around 1981, about the same vintage as the country's housing overall (1980). Homes here are newer than in the San Francisco area as a whole, where the median home dates to 1968. Newer construction is concentrated in the north, while the west has the oldest housing.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Clayton
| Period | Clayton | San Francisco area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,614 | $1,452 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,828 | $1,551 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $2,377 | $2,139 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $3,111 | $2,666 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$1,497 | +$1,214 | +$931 | +$606 |
The median renter in Clayton pays $3,111 a month for rent and utilities, well above the national median of $1,571. Rents are up $1,497 a month from 2006–10, a 93% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. The typical renter here spends 31.7% of household income on rent, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent. The priciest rents are in the north; the most affordable are in the center.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Clayton
Bachelor's degrees in Clayton
| Period | Clayton | San Francisco area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 50.5% | 42.5% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 47.4% | 44.1% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 53.4% | 48.9% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 55.5% | 52.2% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +5.1 pts | +9.7 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
College graduates are unusually common in Clayton: 55.5% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's degree or higher, against 35.6% nationally. Education tends to track local incomes and the kinds of jobs nearby. The share with a degree is up 5.1 points from 2006–10, in line with the national trend.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Clayton
| Period | Clayton | San Francisco area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 97.6% | 86.8% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 97.6% | 87.5% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 97.3% | 88.8% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 98.3% | 89.1% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +0.7 pts | +2.3 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Clayton: 98.3% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%. The share with a diploma is up 0.7 points from 2006–10, a smaller shift than nationally. Of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people, only 27 have a higher share of high school graduates.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Clayton
| Period | Clayton | San Francisco area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.5% | 7.8% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 9.1% | 8.9% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 3.9% | 4.6% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.9% | 5.8% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | +0.4 pts | −2.0 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Clayton is close to the national rate: 5.9% of the labor force, against 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Clayton compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton | 2.80 | 43.0 | 10.8% | 12.6% | 1.9% | 1981 | $3,111 | 55.5% | 98.3% | 5.9% |
| Concord | 2.69 | 40.7 | 9.6% | 38.5% | 4.2% | 1969 | $2,483 | 37.5% | 87.3% | 5.4% |
| Pittsburg | 3.31 | 36.5 | 12.8% | 36.4% | 4.9% | 1985 | $2,347 | 23.9% | 81.6% | 8.1% |
| Diablo | 2.54 | 47.5 | 2.1% | 9.4% | 3.6% | 1971 | $3,440 | 75.9% | 98.9% | 3.5% |
| Bay Point | 3.59 | 32.6 | 18.6% | 45.8% | 3.1% | 1979 | $2,212 | 14.0% | 71.4% | 9.0% |
| Walnut Creek | 2.27 | 46.2 | 5.2% | 38.1% | 3.8% | 1973 | $2,772 | 70.6% | 97.2% | 5.5% |
| Alamo | 2.85 | 49.6 | 3.5% | 8.2% | 5.4% | 1977 | $3,501 | 75.8% | 97.9% | 3.6% |
| Antioch | 3.13 | 39.5 | 16.4% | 36.9% | 4.3% | 1984 | $2,625 | 24.0% | 85.1% | 7.5% |
| Castle Hill | 2.68 | 45.7 | 6.6% | 5.1% | 3.0% | 1966 | $3,501 | 87.1% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Pleasant Hill | 2.57 | 43.3 | 10.3% | 37.7% | 7.4% | 1970 | $2,742 | 52.0% | 95.2% | 5.0% |
| Danville | 2.88 | 45.5 | 5.4% | 14.3% | 3.6% | 1985 | $3,323 | 73.0% | 97.9% | 4.7% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Grafton, OH · Suamico, WI · Suffern, NY · Greenbrier, TN · Sunbury, OH · Superior, CO · Gray, GA · Granville, OH · Grantsville, UT · Storrs, CT
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Clayton. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.