Population 214 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Cougar: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Cougar
Household size in Cougar
| Period | Cougar | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.08 | 2.56 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.40 | 2.62 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.46 | 2.62 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.73 | 2.61 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.65 | +0.05 | −0.03 |
At 2.73 people per household, Cougar sits close to the national average of 2.65. The typical household here is bigger than in Washington as a whole, where it has 2.61 people. Household size has climbed from 2.08 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Cougar
| Period | Cougar | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 51.9 | 38.0 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 46.5 | 38.7 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 48.1 | 39.3 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 49.2 | 39.6 | 40.1 |
| Change | −2.7 | +1.6 | +2.3 |
With a median age of 49.2, Cougar is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Cougar
| Period | Cougar | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.7% | 10.9% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 13.5% | 10.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 8.4% | 10.1% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.6% | 10.1% | 11.6% |
| Change | +3.9 pts | −0.8 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Cougar: 7.6% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Cougar
Renters in Cougar
| Period | Cougar | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 24.3% | 35.2% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 17.9% | 37.3% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 6.4% | 37.0% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 17.8% | 36.2% | 34.8% |
| Change | −6.6 pts | +1.0 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 17.8% of households in Cougar rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 30.7% have no mortgage at all, below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Cougar
| Period | Cougar | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 25.8% | 9.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 44.9% | 9.2% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 38.5% | 8.2% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 35.0% | 7.6% | 9.6% |
| Change | +9.2 pts | −1.6 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 35.0% of the housing in Cougar, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Cougar
| Period | Cougar | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1980 | 1977 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1988 | 1979 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1989 | 1980 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1999 | 1984 | 1980 |
| Change | +19 | +6 | +6 |
Cougar has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1999, versus 1980 nationally.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Cougar
| Period | Cougar | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $717 | $1,018 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,168 | $1,127 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $853 | $1,390 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,025 | $1,875 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$308 | +$858 | +$606 |
The median renter in Cougar pays $1,025 a month for rent and utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rent takes 21.7% of the typical renter's income, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Cougar
Bachelor's degrees in Cougar
| Period | Cougar | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 16.1% | 31.0% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 25.4% | 32.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 21.9% | 35.5% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 14.4% | 38.8% | 35.6% |
| Change | −1.7 pts | +7.8 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Cougar: 14.4% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Cougar
| Period | Cougar | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 85.9% | 89.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 92.8% | 90.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 96.9% | 91.0% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 86.5% | 91.9% | 89.3% |
| Change | +0.6 pts | +2.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
Nearly one in seven adults in Cougar never finished high school, a bit more than nationally: 86.5% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% across the U.S.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Cougar
| Period | Cougar | Washington | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.9% | 7.6% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 19.7% | 8.9% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.5% | 5.1% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.3% | 5.1% | 5.4% |
| Change | −1.7 pts | −2.5 pts | −2.7 pts |
The job market in Cougar has been strong: just 3.3% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Cougar compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cougar | 2.73 | 49.2 | 7.6% | 17.8% | 35.0% | 1999 | $1,025 | 14.4% | 86.5% | 3.3% |
| Yale | 2.81 | 46.7 | 6.9% | 17.1% | 21.6% | 1992 | $1,087 | 12.1% | 91.4% | 0.7% |
| Ariel | 2.92 | 46.7 | 7.3% | 18.2% | 25.3% | 1998 | $1,025 | 17.3% | 87.2% | 2.6% |
| Chelatchie | 3.04 | 38.3 | 4.5% | 23.3% | 18.9% | 1994 | $1,296 | 36.7% | 94.0% | 1.5% |
| Amboy | 2.76 | 40.3 | 6.3% | 16.5% | 10.9% | 1992 | $1,401 | 24.5% | 96.1% | 3.6% |
| Yacolt | 3.22 | 33.7 | 3.7% | 11.3% | 7.7% | 1994 | $1,774 | 20.4% | 90.0% | 2.4% |
| Venersborg | 3.10 | 41.6 | 6.0% | 2.7% | 2.1% | 1993 | $1,649 | 37.7% | 93.1% | 5.2% |
| Paradise | 3.04 | 34.9 | 13.4% | 19.9% | 5.8% | 1996 | $1,092 | 47.0% | 92.5% | 2.7% |
| La Center | 2.90 | 40.1 | 5.3% | 16.5% | 9.7% | 1995 | $1,814 | 26.2% | 92.8% | 3.5% |
| Battle Ground | 2.93 | 39.8 | 6.4% | 18.2% | 5.0% | 1996 | $1,817 | 29.0% | 94.1% | 3.6% |
| Woodland | 3.08 | 36.8 | 10.6% | 27.2% | 4.6% | 1995 | $1,782 | 18.4% | 87.4% | 2.8% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Romona, IN · Tintah, MN · Danville, WA · Datto, AR · Desire, PA · Dunlap, KY · Smith, KY · Rueter, MO · Rudolph, TN · Roscoe, MO
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Cougar. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.