Population 128 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Fish Camp: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Fish Camp
Household size in Fish Camp
| Period | Fish Camp | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.38 | 3.29 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.21 | 3.31 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.17 | 3.27 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 1.75 | 3.25 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.63 | −0.04 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Fish Camp is a place of small households, averaging 1.75 people against 2.65 for the U.S., which points to many singles, couples and roommates and relatively few children. Household size has dropped from 2.38 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Fish Camp
| Period | Fish Camp | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 47.7 | 32.4 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 54.2 | 33.1 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 46.7 | 33.9 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 54.7 | 34.5 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +7.0 | +2.2 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Fish Camp skews older: half of its residents are older than 54.7, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Fish Camp
| Period | Fish Camp | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.2% | 17.2% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 5.7% | 17.9% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 9.0% | 17.7% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | +3.8 pts | +0.5 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are less common in Fish Camp than nationally: 9.0%, against 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Fish Camp
Renters in Fish Camp
| Period | Fish Camp | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 42.1% | 44.0% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 27.5% | 45.9% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 34.8% | 45.3% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 23.0% | 43.0% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | −19.1 pts | −1.0 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Fish Camp is largely a place of homeowners: only 23.0% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. About half of owners (49.0%) have paid off their mortgages, above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Fish Camp
| Period | Fish Camp | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 38.1% | 9.6% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 49.9% | 8.8% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 43.8% | 7.5% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 44.3% | 6.8% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +6.3 pts | −2.8 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Fish Camp: 44.3% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Fish Camp
| Period | Fish Camp | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1978 | 1977 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1979 | 1980 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1977 | 1981 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1980 | 1984 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +2 | +6 | +4 | +6 |
Homes in Fish Camp are the same age as the nation's housing: the median home was built in 1980.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Fish Camp
| Period | Fish Camp | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $856 | $968 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,087 | $1,042 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $920 | $1,170 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,545 | $1,635 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$689 | +$667 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in Fish Camp runs $1,545 a month at the median, utilities included, close to the U.S. median of $1,571. Rents here are lower than in the Fresno area as a whole ($1,635). The typical renter here spends 29.7% of household income on rent, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Fish Camp
Bachelor's degrees in Fish Camp
| Period | Fish Camp | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.5% | 18.7% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 18.0% | 18.6% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 24.6% | 19.6% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 37.1% | 23.1% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +16.6 pts | +4.4 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
More than a third of adults 25 and older in Fish Camp (37.1%) hold at least a bachelor's degree, close to the national share of 35.6%. The share is higher than in the wider Fresno area (23.1%).
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Fish Camp
| Period | Fish Camp | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 98.1% | 71.6% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 90.4% | 72.0% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 94.1% | 74.4% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 91.7% | 77.5% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | −6.3 pts | +5.9 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
About nine in ten adults in Fish Camp have finished high school (91.7%), a bit above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Fish Camp
| Period | Fish Camp | Fresno area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1.1% | 11.7% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 6.8% | 14.0% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 3.0% | 9.0% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 17.8% | 9.0% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | +16.7 pts | −2.7 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Finding work has been harder in Fish Camp: 17.8% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well above the national rate of 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Fish Camp compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish Camp | 1.75 | 54.7 | 9.0% | 23.0% | 44.3% | 1980 | $1,545 | 37.1% | 91.7% | 17.8% |
| Nipinnawasee | 2.05 | 55.1 | 8.4% | 9.8% | 19.5% | 1988 | $1,571 | 23.0% | 92.4% | 8.0% |
| Wawona | 1.13 | 67.1 | 4.4% | 70.8% | 77.6% | 1970 | $1,133 | 51.2% | 80.8% | 5.6% |
| Darrah | 1.97 | 58.8 | 10.3% | 20.8% | 21.7% | 1989 | $1,667 | 31.6% | 93.3% | 9.8% |
| Ahwahnee | 2.17 | 61.1 | 7.7% | 10.5% | 12.3% | 1989 | $1,480 | 20.1% | 92.5% | 6.1% |
| Oakhurst | 2.61 | 48.6 | 11.2% | 18.9% | 27.6% | 1980 | $1,656 | 30.0% | 91.1% | 9.2% |
| Mariposa | 2.01 | 57.1 | 9.2% | 31.0% | 19.1% | 1986 | $1,332 | 34.9% | 92.8% | 7.0% |
| Mormon Bar | 2.17 | 54.5 | 7.9% | 27.1% | 17.2% | 1989 | $1,417 | 28.2% | 93.8% | 6.0% |
| Bass Lake | 2.76 | 56.3 | 7.7% | 5.5% | 56.3% | 1977 | $1,449 | 27.5% | 93.9% | 30.7% |
| Midpines | 1.83 | 57.6 | 9.6% | 25.4% | 22.0% | 1977 | $1,334 | 36.5% | 83.1% | 10.7% |
| Mount Bullion | 2.30 | 56.4 | 10.5% | 10.9% | 13.0% | 1984 | $1,116 | 32.7% | 83.1% | 0.5% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: North Harpersfield, NY · Northfield, ME · North Santiam, OR · North San Ysidro, NM · North River, ND · North Lowell, WI · North Lemmon, ND · North Hebron, NY · North Haven, ME · Oldenburg, TX
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Fish Camp. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.