Population 1,101 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Francisco: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Francisco
Household size in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Indiana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.07 | 2.57 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.45 | 2.59 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.20 | 2.57 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.39 | 2.54 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.32 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Francisco is a place of small households, averaging 2.39 people against 2.65 for the U.S., which points to many singles, couples and roommates and relatively few children. Household size has climbed from 2.07 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Indiana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 47.8 | 37.5 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 42.9 | 38.4 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 49.6 | 39.1 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 47.0 | 39.3 | 40.1 |
| Change | −0.8 | +1.7 | +2.3 |
With a median age of 47.0, Francisco is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Indiana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.1% | 11.8% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 8.2% | 12.0% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 4.1% | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.4% | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | +2.3 pts | −0.1 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Francisco: 5.4% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Francisco
Renters in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Indiana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.5% | 28.5% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 8.0% | 30.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 10.4% | 30.9% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 11.1% | 29.4% | 34.8% |
| Change | −0.4 pts | +1.0 pts | +1.5 pts |
Francisco is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 11.1% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. More than four in ten owners (44.5%) have paid off their mortgages, above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Indiana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 15.1% | 11.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 15.5% | 11.2% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 13.7% | 10.9% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 7.8% | 9.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −7.3 pts | −2.0 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is on the low side in Francisco: 7.8% of homes sit empty, against 9.6% nationally, which points to steady demand for housing. Indiana as a whole looks much the same.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Indiana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1965 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1963 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1972 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1966 | 1977 | 1980 |
| Change | +1 | +5 | +6 |
Francisco is a place of older homes: half were built before 1966, while the national median is 1980. That means established neighborhoods, and more houses that may need updating.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Indiana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $686 | $763 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $673 | $819 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $994 | $903 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $980 | $1,146 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$294 | +$384 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Francisco costs $980 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rent takes 29.2% of the typical renter's income, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Francisco
Bachelor's degrees in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Indiana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.8% | 23.8% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 8.0% | 24.6% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 15.6% | 27.1% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 17.6% | 30.0% | 35.6% |
| Change | +10.8 pts | +6.2 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Francisco have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 17.6%, against 35.6% nationally.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Indiana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 79.5% | 86.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 88.9% | 87.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 92.8% | 88.7% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 94.8% | 89.9% | 89.3% |
| Change | +15.3 pts | +3.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion is high in Francisco: 94.8% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Indiana | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.4% | 8.4% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 4.7% | 8.9% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 1.2% | 4.9% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 0.8% | 4.3% | 5.4% |
| Change | −5.6 pts | −4.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
The job market in Francisco has been strong: just 0.8% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Francisco compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco | 2.39 | 47.0 | 5.4% | 11.1% | 7.8% | 1966 | $980 | 17.6% | 94.8% | 0.8% |
| Douglas | 2.32 | 44.8 | 7.1% | 14.7% | 9.3% | 1970 | $1,050 | 14.6% | 91.3% | 2.5% |
| Somerville | 2.34 | 47.8 | 1.4% | 14.3% | 11.2% | 1983 | $752 | 19.1% | 87.8% | 0.5% |
| Oakland City | 2.40 | 43.2 | 9.0% | 27.7% | 14.6% | 1962 | $871 | 19.0% | 88.0% | 3.9% |
| Mackey | 2.62 | 47.6 | 1.8% | 22.9% | 12.8% | 1966 | $864 | 21.9% | 83.5% | 1.6% |
| Princeton | 2.38 | 38.8 | 9.8% | 31.7% | 11.8% | 1968 | $997 | 12.1% | 87.3% | 2.5% |
| Mount Olympus | 2.31 | 54.1 | 5.7% | 3.5% | 8.4% | 1969 | $800 | 21.0% | 95.4% | 1.4% |
| Union | 3.02 | 32.7 | 3.2% | 4.0% | 12.0% | 1984 | $739 | 22.8% | 88.7% | 7.3% |
| Patoka | 2.51 | 41.3 | 6.5% | 12.3% | 8.4% | 1979 | $758 | 21.0% | 95.4% | 0.7% |
| Glezen | 2.42 | 50.7 | 6.8% | 2.1% | 9.5% | 1980 | $822 | 13.7% | 92.8% | 0.9% |
| Fort Branch | 2.31 | 34.3 | 22.0% | 27.6% | 7.8% | 1974 | $1,019 | 25.9% | 95.1% | 2.2% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Indian Mills, NJ · Sigel, IL · Shelbyville, TX · Sewickley Hills, PA · Saranac, NY · Round Rock, AZ · Otwell, IN · Nageezi, NM · Mooreland, IN · Luther, MI
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Francisco. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.