Population 141 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Francisco: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Francisco
Household size in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Winston-Salem area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.59 | 2.49 | 2.53 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.19 | 2.50 | 2.58 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.08 | 2.49 | 2.56 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 1.99 | 2.46 | 2.52 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.60 | −0.03 | −0.01 | −0.03 |
Francisco is a place of small households, averaging 1.99 people against 2.65 for the U.S., which points to many singles, couples and roommates and relatively few children. Household size has dropped from 2.59 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Winston-Salem area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 44.8 | 39.1 | 37.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 52.5 | 40.2 | 38.9 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 54.3 | 41.5 | 40.2 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 56.9 | 41.5 | 40.3 | 40.1 |
| Change | +12.2 | +2.4 | +2.3 | +2.3 |
Francisco skews older: half of its residents are older than 56.9, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Winston-Salem area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.4% | 12.1% | 12.3% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 8.4% | 12.3% | 12.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 4.2% | 11.7% | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.7% | 11.8% | 11.4% | 11.6% |
| Change | −3.7 pts | −0.4 pts | −1.0 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 2.7% of households in Francisco, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Francisco
Renters in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Winston-Salem area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 19.4% | 29.2% | 31.9% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 16.4% | 31.4% | 34.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 8.6% | 33.2% | 34.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 6.1% | 30.8% | 33.4% | 34.8% |
| Change | −13.4 pts | +1.6 pts | +1.4 pts | +1.5 pts |
Francisco is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 6.1% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Among homeowners, 66.5% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Winston-Salem area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 13.1% | 11.4% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 22.7% | 11.5% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 12.0% | 11.4% | 12.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 16.1% | 9.9% | 11.4% | 9.6% |
| Change | +3.0 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 16.1% of the housing in Francisco, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Winston-Salem area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1979 | 1980 | 1983 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1985 | 1980 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1984 | 1982 | 1986 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1972 | 1985 | 1990 | 1980 |
| Change | −7 | +5 | +7 | +6 |
Homes in Francisco run older than the national norm, with a median build year of 1972 against 1980.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Winston-Salem area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $550 | $700 | $789 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $810 | $751 | $868 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $679 | $830 | $981 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $763 | $1,102 | $1,317 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$213 | +$403 | +$528 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Francisco costs $763 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 9.0% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Francisco
Bachelor's degrees in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Winston-Salem area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.5% | 25.2% | 27.8% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 16.9% | 25.9% | 29.0% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 16.3% | 27.2% | 32.0% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 19.9% | 31.2% | 36.2% | 35.6% |
| Change | +13.4 pts | +6.0 pts | +8.4 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Francisco: 19.9% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Winston-Salem area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 77.7% | 83.9% | 84.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 70.5% | 84.4% | 86.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 87.2% | 87.0% | 88.1% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 89.2% | 89.6% | 90.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +11.5 pts | +5.7 pts | +5.7 pts | +4.3 pts |
About as many adults in Francisco have finished high school as nationally: 89.2%, against 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Francisco
| Period | Francisco | Winston-Salem area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.4% | 8.4% | 8.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 23.1% | 10.3% | 10.6% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 5.7% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 8.6% | 4.8% | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| Change | +0.3 pts | −3.5 pts | −4.0 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Francisco runs well above the national rate: 8.6% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Francisco compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco | 1.99 | 56.9 | 2.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | 1972 | $763 | 19.9% | 89.2% | 8.6% |
| Westfield | 2.28 | 50.4 | 6.1% | 16.5% | 13.4% | 1981 | $790 | 18.4% | 90.5% | 4.6% |
| Claudville | 2.16 | 57.0 | 4.4% | 16.1% | 12.0% | 1986 | $541 | 18.8% | 82.0% | 1.4% |
| Carters Mills | 2.29 | 61.8 | 6.6% | 15.0% | 10.6% | 1979 | $930 | 10.3% | 86.6% | 18.8% |
| Danbury | 2.07 | 52.0 | 2.4% | 18.1% | 15.0% | 1982 | $734 | 13.9% | 90.8% | 1.9% |
| Pilot Mountain | 2.41 | 48.9 | 10.4% | 23.1% | 10.2% | 1983 | $967 | 22.1% | 88.9% | 4.7% |
| Kibler | 2.33 | 52.1 | 2.5% | 21.1% | 28.7% | 1980 | $783 | 16.2% | 83.0% | 1.6% |
| Stuart | 2.19 | 48.3 | 9.0% | 29.2% | 20.3% | 1979 | $625 | 16.6% | 87.0% | 2.6% |
| Hartman | 3.00 | 43.9 | 12.9% | 12.7% | 10.4% | 1986 | $645 | 11.7% | 88.7% | 5.7% |
| Ash Hill | 2.51 | 47.0 | 14.1% | 20.2% | 11.6% | 1985 | $978 | 18.5% | 79.5% | 2.2% |
| Ararat | 2.52 | 51.0 | 5.8% | 18.6% | 32.2% | 1975 | $885 | 15.6% | 84.8% | 4.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Lloyds, MD · Waterburg, NY · Likely, CA · Lillis, KS · Wasta, SD · Washington Corner, VA · Lincklaen, NY · Lincoln Beach, OR · Lipps, VA · Litchfield Plains, ME
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Francisco. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.