Garnet, CA Demographics

Population 7,956 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Garnet, CA map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Garnet: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Garnet

Household size in Garnet

Household size, people per household
PeriodGarnetRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–102.933.353.042.68
2010–142.983.433.102.73
2015–192.863.423.092.71
2020–242.803.343.012.65
Change−0.13−0.01−0.03−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

Households in Garnet average 2.80 people, a bit above the national 2.65, so families with children are somewhat more common here. Still, the typical household here is smaller than in the wider Riverside area, where it has 3.34 people. Household size has dropped from 2.93 in 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Garnet

Median age, years
PeriodGarnetRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1033.233.635.837.7
2010–1436.234.636.838.6
2015–1940.735.937.939.6
2020–2438.637.039.040.1
Change+5.4+3.4+3.1+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

Half of the people in Garnet are younger than 38.6 and half are older, close to the national median of 40.1. The population here is older than in the wider Riverside area, where the median age is 37.0. The median age has climbed from 33.2 in 2006–10, mirroring the country.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Garnet

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodGarnetRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1013.7%15.2%13.5%12.3%
2010–1411.2%15.7%13.5%12.3%
2015–1912.0%14.4%12.3%11.6%
2020–2416.0%14.8%12.3%11.6%
Change+2.3 pts−0.3 pts−1.2 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single-parent households are common in Garnet: 16.0% of all households, against 11.6% nationally. The single-parent share is up 2.3 points from 2006–10, even as the national share fell.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Garnet

Renters in Garnet

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodGarnetRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1019.2%32.3%42.6%33.3%
2010–1429.1%36.6%45.2%35.6%
2015–1935.0%36.7%45.2%36.0%
2020–2433.1%34.2%44.1%34.8%
Change+14.0 pts+1.9 pts+1.5 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Renting in Garnet is about as common as it is nationally: 33.1% of households rent, against 34.8%. Among homeowners, 43.7% have no mortgage at all, above the national share of 39.8%. Rentals cluster in the southeast; owners are most common in the center. The renter share has risen 14.0 points since 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Garnet

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodGarnetRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1020.7%11.8%8.7%11.4%
2010–1419.6%10.9%8.1%11.4%
2015–1925.9%9.4%7.5%11.1%
2020–2410.8%7.8%7.3%9.6%
Change−9.8 pts−4.0 pts−1.4 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

About as many homes sit empty in Garnet as nationally: 10.8%, against 9.6%. The rate is higher than in the Riverside area overall (7.8%). Vacancy has fallen 9.8 points since 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Garnet

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodGarnetRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–101991198319721974
2010–141992198419731975
2015–191992198419741977
2020–241992198619761980
Change+2+3+4+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Garnet has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1992, versus 1980 nationally. Newer construction is concentrated in the north, while the southeast has the oldest housing. Garnet has newer homes than at least four in five California cities.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Garnet

Rent, per month
PeriodGarnetRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–10$890$1,287$1,298$965
2010–14$924$1,332$1,379$1,040
2015–19$1,021$1,549$1,721$1,213
2020–24$1,490$2,083$2,229$1,571
Change+$600+$796+$931+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

Rent in Garnet runs $1,490 a month at the median, utilities included, below the U.S. median of $1,571. Rents are up $600 a month from 2006–10, a 67% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. The typical renter here spends 49.4% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. Renters on a budget will find the lowest rents in the north; the highest are in the west.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Garnet

Bachelor's degrees in Garnet

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodGarnetRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1011.7%19.2%29.1%28.4%
2010–1412.9%19.4%30.1%29.6%
2015–1913.7%21.2%32.9%32.1%
2020–2420.7%24.0%36.3%35.6%
Change+9.0 pts+4.8 pts+7.1 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

College degrees are relatively uncommon in Garnet: 20.7% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%. The share with a degree has risen 9.0 points since 2006–10, mirroring the country. College graduates are most concentrated in the center and least in the north.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Garnet

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodGarnetRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1074.3%77.9%79.9%84.9%
2010–1469.4%78.6%80.7%86.1%
2015–1968.8%80.6%82.6%87.7%
2020–2474.1%82.5%84.2%89.3%
Change−0.2 pts+4.6 pts+4.3 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Just over a quarter of adults in Garnet never finished high school, well above the national share: only 74.1% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally. Garnet has a lower share of high school graduates than the great majority of California cities.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Garnet

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodGarnetRiverside areaCaliforniaU.S.
2006–1014.1%11.4%9.2%8.1%
2010–1414.9%14.4%11.3%9.4%
2015–195.8%7.7%6.3%5.6%
2020–245.0%6.8%6.6%5.4%
Change−9.1 pts−4.6 pts−2.6 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

At 5.0%, unemployment in Garnet is close to the national rate of 5.4%. The rate is lower than in the Riverside area as a whole (6.8%). Since 2006–10, unemployment has fallen 9.1 points, a much bigger shift than nationally.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Garnet compared with nearby cities

CityHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Garnet2.8038.616.0%33.1%10.8%1992$1,49020.7%74.1%5.0%
Desert Hot Springs3.0236.617.8%44.6%11.4%1989$1,55816.1%77.3%6.6%
North Palm Springs2.8441.96.4%29.7%20.8%1989$1,83021.4%77.9%1.0%
Desert Edge1.9062.38.8%9.8%41.1%1983$93017.0%87.7%6.0%
Sky Valley2.2853.78.9%15.2%27.9%1983$1,40621.5%84.3%9.7%
Palm Springs1.9955.47.0%33.6%30.5%1980$1,76942.8%91.9%7.1%
Cathedral City2.9542.312.8%33.8%12.0%1987$1,74622.0%78.5%6.3%
Thousand Palms2.9542.715.3%25.1%24.6%1988$1,74625.7%83.5%5.3%
Morongo Valley2.4743.517.9%28.6%9.6%1972$1,33417.5%89.3%8.6%
Snow Creek2.5146.210.3%22.4%20.6%1990$1,16022.4%85.4%11.1%
White Water2.9241.911.9%19.2%12.1%1996$1,1519.6%84.1%16.1%

All figures 2020–24.

Cities with similar populations: Waterville, OH · Guayanilla, PR · Wells, ME · Hacienda San Jose, PR · Wellington, KS · Haiku-Pauwela, HI · Hales Corners, WI · Halifax, MA · Hamburg, NJ · Weare, NH

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Garnet. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.