Good Intent, PA Demographics

Population 127 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Good Intent, PA map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Good Intent: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Good Intent

Household size in Good Intent

Household size, people per household
PeriodGood IntentPittsburgh areaPennsylvaniaU.S.
2006–102.512.372.512.68
2010–142.832.352.532.73
2015–192.712.292.502.71
2020–242.592.302.462.65
Change+0.08−0.07−0.05−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

At 2.59 people per household, Good Intent sits close to the national average of 2.65. The typical household here is bigger than in the wider Pittsburgh area, where it has 2.30 people.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Good Intent

Median age, years
PeriodGood IntentPittsburgh areaPennsylvaniaU.S.
2006–1045.442.540.337.7
2010–1442.843.041.038.6
2015–1945.443.741.839.6
2020–2446.643.942.040.1
Change+1.2+1.4+1.7+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

With a median age of 46.6, Good Intent is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees. The median age has climbed from 45.4 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Good Intent

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodGood IntentPittsburgh areaPennsylvaniaU.S.
2006–104.9%8.9%10.5%12.3%
2010–144.7%8.8%10.6%12.3%
2015–196.1%8.4%10.5%11.6%
2020–2410.5%8.8%10.7%11.6%
Change+5.7 pts−0.0 pts+0.2 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single parents head about one in ten households in Good Intent (10.5%), a little below the national share of 11.6%. Even so, single parents are more common here than in the Pittsburgh area overall (8.8%).

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Good Intent

Renters in Good Intent

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodGood IntentPittsburgh areaPennsylvaniaU.S.
2006–1014.5%28.5%29.0%33.3%
2010–1414.7%29.9%30.5%35.6%
2015–1916.5%30.3%31.1%36.0%
2020–2415.6%29.3%30.7%34.8%
Change+1.0 pts+0.8 pts+1.7 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Good Intent is largely a place of homeowners: only 15.6% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Among homeowners, 59.0% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Good Intent

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodGood IntentPittsburgh areaPennsylvaniaU.S.
2006–1013.4%10.7%10.3%11.4%
2010–1416.4%10.4%10.5%11.4%
2015–1913.6%10.5%10.7%11.1%
2020–2416.8%10.0%9.1%9.6%
Change+3.3 pts−0.7 pts−1.2 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Vacancy is high in Good Intent: 16.8% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Good Intent

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodGood IntentPittsburgh areaPennsylvaniaU.S.
2006–101972196019631974
2010–141974196119641975
2015–191981196219651977
2020–241976196419671980
Change+4+4+4+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Homes in Good Intent are about the same age as the nation's housing: the median home was built in 1976, versus 1980 nationally. Homes here are newer than in the Pittsburgh area as a whole, where the median home dates to 1964.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Good Intent

Rent, per month
PeriodGood IntentPittsburgh areaPennsylvaniaU.S.
2006–10$540$720$829$965
2010–14$575$801$923$1,040
2015–19$697$922$1,039$1,213
2020–24$815$1,162$1,323$1,571
Change+$275+$442+$494+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

A typical rental in Good Intent costs $815 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 21.2% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Good Intent

Bachelor's degrees in Good Intent

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodGood IntentPittsburgh areaPennsylvaniaU.S.
2006–1013.0%29.5%27.2%28.4%
2010–1417.9%31.7%28.7%29.6%
2015–1919.6%35.2%31.8%32.1%
2020–2419.7%39.0%35.6%35.6%
Change+6.7 pts+9.5 pts+8.3 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Fewer adults in Good Intent have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 19.7%, against 35.6% nationally.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Good Intent

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodGood IntentPittsburgh areaPennsylvaniaU.S.
2006–1085.9%90.8%87.3%84.9%
2010–1489.2%92.3%88.8%86.1%
2015–1990.0%93.8%90.3%87.7%
2020–2491.8%95.0%91.8%89.3%
Change+5.9 pts+4.2 pts+4.5 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

High school completion in Good Intent is a bit above the national rate: 91.8% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%. Locally, though, the rate is lower than in the Pittsburgh area overall (95.0%).

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Good Intent

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodGood IntentPittsburgh areaPennsylvaniaU.S.
2006–107.2%6.9%7.5%8.1%
2010–1410.3%7.5%8.8%9.4%
2015–194.4%4.9%5.5%5.6%
2020–244.4%5.0%5.4%5.4%
Change−2.9 pts−1.9 pts−2.1 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Unemployment in Good Intent runs below the national rate: 4.4% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4% nationally. That is in line with the rest of the Pittsburgh area. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Good Intent compared with nearby cities

CityHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Good Intent2.5946.610.5%15.6%16.8%1976$81519.7%91.8%4.4%
West Finley2.4646.99.7%16.5%16.9%1977$77821.7%91.3%4.7%
West Alexander2.4047.23.9%14.6%10.7%1960$96321.9%94.2%10.1%
Simpson Store2.3948.67.9%16.4%14.1%1978$78124.8%89.9%2.6%
Enon2.3445.49.9%17.2%20.5%1973$80420.1%92.4%8.9%
Claysville2.4745.65.6%14.9%12.7%1963$85525.6%92.5%5.9%
Dallas2.3246.912.6%27.8%7.9%1973$1,10211.7%91.7%2.0%
Valley Grove2.5842.86.1%27.8%11.6%1975$97019.9%88.7%5.3%
Majorsville2.3857.39.8%12.3%19.8%1976$1,04333.2%97.3%1.0%
Sparta2.4948.36.8%22.9%15.7%1975$94617.9%97.4%4.7%
Durbin2.3945.510.0%17.0%20.0%1973$80919.9%92.4%8.3%

All figures 2020–24.

Cities with similar populations: Wildie, KY · Furman, AL · Fruitvale, TN · Friendship, LA · Freeport, KS · Freedleyville, VT · Fowler Grove, TN · Fort Howard, MD · Foresman, IN · White Sulphur Springs, GA

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Good Intent. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.