Grantsdale, MT Demographics

Population 162 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Grantsdale, MT map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Grantsdale: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Grantsdale

Household size in Grantsdale

Household size, people per household
PeriodGrantsdaleMontanaU.S.
2006–102.062.412.68
2010–142.282.452.73
2015–192.182.442.71
2020–242.352.442.65
Change+0.28+0.03−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

Grantsdale is a place of small households, averaging 2.35 people against 2.65 for the U.S., which points to many singles, couples and roommates and relatively few children. Household size has climbed from 2.06 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Grantsdale

Median age, years
PeriodGrantsdaleMontanaU.S.
2006–1054.339.937.7
2010–1452.440.838.6
2015–1956.241.539.6
2020–2455.341.540.1
Change+0.9+1.6+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

With a median age of 55.3, Grantsdale is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Grantsdale

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodGrantsdaleMontanaU.S.
2006–102.6%9.4%12.3%
2010–144.3%9.8%12.3%
2015–195.8%8.7%11.6%
2020–243.2%8.8%11.6%
Change+0.7 pts−0.6 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single-parent households are relatively rare in Grantsdale: 3.2% of households, against 11.6% nationally.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Grantsdale

Renters in Grantsdale

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodGrantsdaleMontanaU.S.
2006–1016.3%31.0%33.3%
2010–1413.7%32.3%35.6%
2015–1917.0%31.9%36.0%
2020–2412.9%30.8%34.8%
Change−3.3 pts−0.1 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Only 12.9% of households in Grantsdale rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 49.1% have no mortgage at all, above the national share of 39.8%.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Grantsdale

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodGrantsdaleMontanaU.S.
2006–1013.6%13.2%11.4%
2010–1419.6%13.9%11.4%
2015–1918.5%14.1%11.1%
2020–2416.5%12.2%9.6%
Change+2.9 pts−0.9 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Vacancy is high in Grantsdale: 16.5% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Grantsdale

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodGrantsdaleMontanaU.S.
2006–10198319741974
2010–14198719771975
2015–19199019781977
2020–24199219821980
Change+10+7+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Grantsdale has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1992, versus 1980 nationally.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Grantsdale

Rent, per month
PeriodGrantsdaleMontanaU.S.
2006–10$776$703$965
2010–14$617$775$1,040
2015–19$1,180$870$1,213
2020–24$1,181$1,189$1,571
Change+$404+$487+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

The median renter in Grantsdale pays $1,181 a month for rent and utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Montana as a whole looks much the same. The typical renter here spends 42.5% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Grantsdale

Bachelor's degrees in Grantsdale

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodGrantsdaleMontanaU.S.
2006–1034.8%28.7%28.4%
2010–1432.0%29.8%29.6%
2015–1935.1%32.2%32.1%
2020–2440.6%35.3%35.6%
Change+5.7 pts+6.6 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

College degrees are a bit more common in Grantsdale than nationally: 40.6% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Grantsdale

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodGrantsdaleMontanaU.S.
2006–1095.4%91.2%84.9%
2010–1493.6%92.6%86.1%
2015–1995.9%93.6%87.7%
2020–2495.1%94.6%89.3%
Change−0.3 pts+3.4 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

High school completion is high in Grantsdale: 95.1% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%. That is in line with the rest of Montana.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Grantsdale

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodGrantsdaleMontanaU.S.
2006–107.3%5.7%8.1%
2010–146.4%6.9%9.4%
2015–193.4%4.2%5.6%
2020–244.6%3.7%5.4%
Change−2.7 pts−2.0 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Jobs have been a little easier to find in Grantsdale than nationally: unemployment was 4.6%, against 5.4%. Still, the rate is higher than in Montana overall (3.7%). Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Grantsdale compared with nearby cities

CityHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Grantsdale2.3555.33.2%12.9%16.5%1992$1,18140.6%95.1%4.6%
Darby2.1956.07.2%24.8%19.5%1986$1,01625.4%92.7%7.9%
Hamilton2.4048.56.4%31.3%11.1%1979$1,10631.2%92.4%1.3%
Riverside2.5949.64.6%16.3%16.8%1992$1,11530.9%89.0%1.0%
Conner2.0265.02.0%8.3%43.5%1990$66723.5%89.8%2.5%
Woodside2.4641.512.7%36.3%10.7%1993$1,27511.6%97.1%3.1%
Corvallis2.5748.75.7%17.3%15.4%1996$1,20223.3%92.3%3.7%
Pinesdale3.2043.14.4%15.1%6.7%1990$1,14422.6%92.3%1.5%
Sula1.8966.21.1%11.5%40.0%1991$65022.8%92.5%3.0%
Victor2.5448.47.4%13.1%11.2%1993$1,04425.4%95.3%1.6%
Stevensville2.7145.86.6%16.0%12.9%1993$1,20229.5%94.6%2.9%

All figures 2020–24.

Cities with similar populations: Finchley, VA · Dalewood, SC · Danbury, NE · Dawes, WV · Dedham, ME · Deep River, IN · Dillman, IN · Direct, TX · Disston, OR · Dividing Creek, NJ

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Grantsdale. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.