Population 7,760 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Green: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Green
Household size in Green
| Period | Green | Oregon | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.71 | 2.50 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.72 | 2.55 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.79 | 2.56 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.31 | 2.50 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.40 | +0.00 | −0.03 |
Households in Green are small: just 2.31 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.71, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Green
| Period | Green | Oregon | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 37.1 | 39.0 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 38.6 | 40.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 42.7 | 40.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 44.7 | 41.6 | 40.1 |
| Change | +7.6 | +2.5 | +2.3 |
With a median age of 44.7, Green is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees. Since 2006–10, the median age has climbed from 37.1, a much bigger shift than nationally. The youngest areas are in the west, the oldest in the east.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Green
| Period | Green | Oregon | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.2% | 10.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 10.8% | 10.8% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 12.7% | 9.9% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 15.6% | 10.4% | 11.6% |
| Change | +4.4 pts | −0.1 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head nearly one in six households in Green (15.6%), well above the national share of 11.6%. The single-parent share is up 4.4 points from 2006–10, even as the national share fell. Green has a higher share of single-parent households than at least four in five Oregon cities.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Green
Renters in Green
| Period | Green | Oregon | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.1% | 36.2% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 23.2% | 38.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 24.6% | 37.6% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 20.6% | 36.7% | 34.8% |
| Change | +0.5 pts | +0.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Green is largely a place of homeowners: only 20.6% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Among homeowners, 41.8% have no mortgage at all, about the same as nationally. Rentals cluster in the east; owners are most common in the north.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Green
| Period | Green | Oregon | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.1% | 8.9% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 3.6% | 9.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 9.1% | 8.3% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 4.5% | 7.4% | 9.6% |
| Change | +0.4 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
Only 4.5% of homes in Green are vacant, far below the national rate of 9.6%, which usually means strong demand for housing. Green has a lower vacancy rate than most Oregon cities.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Green
| Period | Green | Oregon | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1984 | 1976 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1991 | 1977 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1986 | 1978 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1989 | 1981 | 1980 |
| Change | +5 | +5 | +6 |
Much of the housing in Green is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 1989, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole. The median year built has moved up from 1984 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building. The newest homes are mostly in the north, the oldest in the center.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Green
| Period | Green | Oregon | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $953 | $870 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $962 | $982 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $997 | $1,183 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,211 | $1,601 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$258 | +$731 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Green costs $1,211 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rents are up $258 a month from 2006–10, a 27% rise, a slower climb than the nation's. Rent takes 30.8% of the typical renter's income, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent. Renters on a budget will find the lowest rents in the east; the highest are in the west.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Green
Bachelor's degrees in Green
| Period | Green | Oregon | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.4% | 29.0% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 11.7% | 30.2% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 12.8% | 33.5% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 15.9% | 36.4% | 35.6% |
| Change | +7.6 pts | +7.3 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Green: 15.9% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%. The share with a degree has risen 7.6 points since 2006–10, mirroring the country. College graduates are most concentrated in the north and least in the center.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Green
| Period | Green | Oregon | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 84.4% | 88.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 86.5% | 89.4% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 85.1% | 90.5% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 93.7% | 91.5% | 89.3% |
| Change | +9.3 pts | +3.0 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Green is above the national rate: 93.7% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%. The share with a diploma has risen 9.3 points since 2006–10, mirroring the country.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Green
| Period | Green | Oregon | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.0% | 8.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 16.3% | 10.6% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.3% | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.5% | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Change | −7.5 pts | −3.5 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Green runs below the national rate: 3.5% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4% nationally. Since 2006–10, unemployment has fallen 7.5 points, in line with the national trend. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Green compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green | 2.31 | 44.7 | 15.6% | 20.6% | 4.5% | 1989 | $1,211 | 15.9% | 93.7% | 3.5% |
| Winston | 2.28 | 48.6 | 10.8% | 23.2% | 6.1% | 1980 | $1,004 | 12.2% | 90.4% | 4.8% |
| Glengary | 2.74 | 44.9 | 3.9% | 21.9% | 11.3% | 1976 | $898 | 13.4% | 91.8% | 6.0% |
| Roseburg | 2.39 | 43.1 | 10.7% | 36.1% | 6.7% | 1971 | $1,248 | 24.0% | 90.9% | 4.9% |
| Dillard | 2.64 | 44.0 | 8.0% | 13.2% | 7.3% | 1975 | $897 | 6.9% | 87.9% | 10.3% |
| Roseburg North | 2.26 | 43.1 | 15.4% | 31.6% | 4.6% | 1977 | $1,096 | 18.9% | 88.4% | 2.1% |
| Winchester | 2.37 | 46.0 | 11.3% | 15.6% | 4.2% | 1981 | $1,135 | 29.3% | 89.1% | 1.1% |
| Tenmile | 2.33 | 47.9 | 9.5% | 12.8% | 8.7% | 1974 | $1,081 | 16.5% | 90.3% | 5.5% |
| Dixonville | 2.19 | 53.2 | 5.4% | 20.4% | 15.7% | 1983 | $1,172 | 15.9% | 89.6% | 3.0% |
| Myrtle Creek | 2.38 | 46.4 | 15.7% | 30.6% | 9.5% | 1975 | $941 | 11.8% | 91.3% | 7.8% |
| Tri-City | 2.33 | 52.3 | 8.5% | 19.1% | 7.6% | 1983 | $903 | 9.8% | 90.2% | 8.3% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Chapel Hill, TN · Bumpass, VA · Burton, SC · Butler, NJ · Carleton, MI · Castle Hayne, NC · Cedarhurst, NY · Center, TX · Centerville, SC · Central City, KY
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Green. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.