Population 809 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Happy Camp: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Happy Camp
Household size in Happy Camp
| Period | Happy Camp | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.20 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.11 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.02 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.12 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.08 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Households in Happy Camp are small: just 2.12 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Happy Camp
| Period | Happy Camp | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 49.5 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 51.9 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 54.2 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 50.3 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +0.8 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Happy Camp skews older: half of its residents are older than 50.3, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Happy Camp
| Period | Happy Camp | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.1% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 7.3% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 8.1% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.0% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | −5.1 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 7.0% of households in Happy Camp, well below the national share of 11.6%. The single-parent share has fallen 5.1 points since 2006–10, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Happy Camp
Renters in Happy Camp
| Period | Happy Camp | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 31.2% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 34.6% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 33.4% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 31.4% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +0.2 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Most households in Happy Camp own their homes; 31.4% rent, a little below the national share of 34.8%. Among homeowners, 67.1% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Happy Camp
| Period | Happy Camp | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 21.3% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 26.1% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 31.9% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 21.9% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +0.5 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 21.9% of the housing in Happy Camp, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Happy Camp
| Period | Happy Camp | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1969 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1967 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1972 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1971 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +2 | +4 | +6 |
The housing in Happy Camp is old by national standards: the median home dates to 1971, against 1980 for the U.S., so buyers will find more older houses, some of them due for updates.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Happy Camp
| Period | Happy Camp | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $547 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $640 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $703 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $774 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$227 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in Happy Camp runs $774 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 22.9% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Happy Camp
Bachelor's degrees in Happy Camp
| Period | Happy Camp | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 16.3% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 21.5% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 16.2% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 23.4% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +7.1 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Happy Camp: 23.4% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Happy Camp
| Period | Happy Camp | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 84.8% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 84.9% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 83.2% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 91.3% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +6.5 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
About nine in ten adults in Happy Camp have finished high school (91.3%), a bit above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Happy Camp
| Period | Happy Camp | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 16.1% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 19.3% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 14.6% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 15.2% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −0.9 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Finding work has been harder in Happy Camp: 15.2% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well above the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Happy Camp compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Happy Camp | 2.12 | 50.3 | 7.0% | 31.4% | 21.9% | 1971 | $774 | 23.4% | 91.3% | 15.2% |
| Seiad Valley | 2.31 | 55.0 | 6.0% | 23.6% | 21.3% | 1974 | $685 | 23.3% | 88.0% | 9.2% |
| Horse Creek | 2.24 | 50.5 | 4.2% | 19.3% | 23.9% | 1975 | $1,048 | 24.9% | 91.9% | 4.6% |
| Scott Bar | 2.23 | 45.9 | 3.0% | 16.2% | 27.4% | 1975 | $1,293 | 26.5% | 95.2% | 1.1% |
| Takilma | 2.24 | 53.2 | 10.9% | 22.6% | 11.6% | 1981 | $1,329 | 30.6% | 92.3% | 9.3% |
| O'Brien | 2.68 | 39.9 | 19.0% | 10.8% | 18.8% | 1983 | $1,159 | 21.1% | 81.3% | 12.9% |
| Mugginsville | 2.62 | 46.2 | 5.8% | 12.2% | 20.9% | 1980 | $1,502 | 21.8% | 93.7% | 5.3% |
| McKee Bridge | 2.41 | 47.9 | 11.0% | 14.5% | 6.7% | 1980 | $1,803 | 29.6% | 92.2% | 10.2% |
| Cave Junction | 2.17 | 48.2 | 10.7% | 24.3% | 16.3% | 1985 | $1,296 | 20.7% | 90.7% | 12.8% |
| Somes Bar | 2.30 | 42.4 | 3.9% | 24.0% | 40.7% | 1970 | $764 | 29.4% | 95.3% | 1.7% |
| Klamath River | 2.30 | 53.1 | 7.8% | 23.2% | 22.2% | 1976 | $888 | 20.2% | 89.6% | 11.1% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Grand Cane, LA · St. Vincent College, PA · Springer, OK · Southmont, NC · South Washington, IN · South Fork, MO · Sodus Point, NY · Smithville, AR · Slidell, TX · Silverstreet, SC
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Happy Camp. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.