Population 6,606 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Irvine Business Complex: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Irvine Business Complex
Household size in Irvine Business Complex
| Period | Irvine Business Complex | Irvine | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.13 | 2.64 | 3.14 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.08 | 2.67 | 3.20 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.10 | 2.74 | 3.16 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.05 | 2.84 | 3.01 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.07 | +0.20 | −0.13 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Households in Irvine Business Complex are small: just 2.05 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Household size has edged down from 2.13 in 2006–10, as it has nationally. Of Irvine's 24 neighborhoods, only two have smaller households.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Irvine Business Complex
| Period | Irvine Business Complex | Irvine | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 40.3 | 35.2 | 35.6 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 33.1 | 35.7 | 36.7 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 34.6 | 35.9 | 38.0 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 33.8 | 35.3 | 39.5 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | −6.4 | +0.0 | +4.0 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Irvine Business Complex is young: half of its residents are under 33.8, compared with a national median of 40.1. The population tilts toward young adults, many of them living alone or as couples. The median age has dropped from 40.3 in 2006–10, even as the national median rose.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Irvine Business Complex
| Period | Irvine Business Complex | Irvine | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.3% | 6.8% | 14.3% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 6.0% | 7.4% | 14.1% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 4.7% | 7.1% | 12.5% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.1% | 9.0% | 12.3% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | −4.3 pts | +2.2 pts | −2.0 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 3.1% of households in Irvine Business Complex, well below the national share of 11.6%. Since 2006–10, the single-parent share has fallen 4.3 points, a much bigger shift than nationally. No other Irvine neighborhood has a lower share of single-parent households.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Irvine Business Complex
Renters in Irvine Business Complex
| Period | Irvine Business Complex | Irvine | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 63.9% | 46.2% | 48.8% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 71.2% | 50.3% | 50.8% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 68.4% | 52.8% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 82.2% | 56.1% | 51.6% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +18.3 pts | +9.8 pts | +2.8 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Most households in Irvine Business Complex rent: 82.2% of occupied homes are rented, far above the national share of 34.8%. Expect more apartments, and more turnover, than in owner-heavy areas. Among homeowners, 41.3% have no mortgage at all, about the same as nationally. The renter share is up 18.3 points from 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Irvine Business Complex
| Period | Irvine Business Complex | Irvine | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 30.0% | 7.3% | 7.0% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 22.6% | 7.2% | 6.7% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 10.8% | 8.4% | 6.6% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 17.3% | 9.6% | 6.7% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −12.7 pts | +2.3 pts | −0.3 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Irvine Business Complex: 17.3% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand. Vacancy is down 12.7 points from 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Irvine Business Complex
| Period | Irvine Business Complex | Irvine | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1999 | 1992 | 1965 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 2003 | 1993 | 1966 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 2006 | 1995 | 1966 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 2014 | 2001 | 1969 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +15 | +9 | +4 | +4 | +6 |
Much of the housing in Irvine Business Complex is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 2014, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole. The median year built has moved up from 1999 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building. Irvine Business Complex has newer homes than at least four in five Irvine neighborhoods.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Irvine Business Complex
| Period | Irvine Business Complex | Irvine | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,812 | $1,781 | $1,328 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,836 | $1,814 | $1,415 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $2,495 | $2,499 | $1,755 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $3,015 | $2,979 | $2,279 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$1,203 | +$1,198 | +$951 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in Irvine Business Complex runs $3,015 a month at the median, utilities included, well above the U.S. median of $1,571. Rent has climbed $1,203 a month since 2006–10, up 66%, faster than rents rose nationally. Rent takes 37.0% of the typical renter's income, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. The priciest rents are in the center; the most affordable are in the northeast.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Irvine Business Complex
Bachelor's degrees in Irvine Business Complex
| Period | Irvine Business Complex | Irvine | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 63.8% | 61.5% | 29.7% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 60.4% | 64.4% | 30.7% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 68.0% | 69.3% | 33.7% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 60.1% | 71.6% | 37.6% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | −3.7 pts | +10.1 pts | +7.9 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
Irvine Business Complex is highly educated: about six in ten adults 25 and older (60.1%) hold at least a bachelor's degree, far above the national share of 35.6%. Locally, though, the share is lower than in Irvine overall (71.6%). Since 2006–10, the share with a degree has fallen 3.7 points, even as the national share rose. Only one other Irvine neighborhood has a lower share of college graduates.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Irvine Business Complex
| Period | Irvine Business Complex | Irvine | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 81.8% | 95.0% | 76.7% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 93.9% | 96.2% | 77.7% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 94.5% | 96.5% | 80.0% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 98.0% | 96.9% | 82.1% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +16.3 pts | +1.9 pts | +5.4 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Irvine Business Complex: 98.0% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%. That is in line with the rest of Irvine. The share with a diploma is up 16.3 points from 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Irvine Business Complex
| Period | Irvine Business Complex | Irvine | Los Angeles area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.6% | 5.4% | 8.5% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 7.7% | 7.2% | 10.6% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.3% | 4.5% | 5.8% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.0% | 5.5% | 6.7% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | +1.4 pts | +0.1 pts | −1.7 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Jobs have been harder to find in Irvine Business Complex than nationally: unemployment was 7.0%, against 5.4%. Of Irvine's 24 neighborhoods, only two have higher unemployment. Unemployment has edged up 1.4 points since 2006–10, even as the national rate fell.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Irvine Business Complex compared with nearby neighborhoods
| Neighborhood | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irvine Business Complex | 2.05 | 33.8 | 3.1% | 82.2% | 17.3% | 2014 | $3,015 | 60.1% | 98.0% | 7.0% |
| Business District | 1.95 | 31.3 | 4.6% | 87.1% | 13.7% | 2010 | $2,971 | 62.9% | 94.0% | 6.3% |
| Rancho San Joaquin | 2.48 | 32.7 | 6.3% | 77.0% | 8.3% | 1978 | $2,648 | 65.7% | 96.9% | 6.2% |
| West Park | 2.92 | 37.6 | 12.3% | 62.8% | 4.6% | 1991 | $3,014 | 68.8% | 96.1% | 4.7% |
| University Town Center | 2.34 | 31.9 | 7.3% | 86.5% | 11.7% | 1985 | $2,491 | 64.7% | 96.7% | 6.0% |
| University Park | 2.99 | 37.1 | 4.8% | 44.4% | 7.6% | 1971 | $3,150 | 65.5% | 96.5% | 5.1% |
| Sandpointe | 3.67 | 33.4 | 18.3% | 64.4% | 5.8% | 1974 | $2,294 | 27.2% | 77.6% | 6.9% |
| Woodbridge | 2.74 | 42.0 | 9.1% | 40.0% | 6.6% | 1981 | $2,981 | 69.9% | 97.3% | 6.2% |
| UC Irvine | 2.55 | 23.0 | 9.6% | 61.9% | 11.2% | 2000 | $1,451 | 74.7% | 97.3% | 11.6% |
| South Coast | 3.25 | 39.5 | 6.1% | 30.2% | 3.8% | 1972 | $2,455 | 36.2% | 79.3% | 5.6% |
| Delhi | 4.53 | 33.4 | 15.6% | 53.4% | 4.7% | 1956 | $2,045 | 10.7% | 64.6% | 6.3% |
All figures 2020–24.
Neighborhoods with similar populations: Urbanizacion Rio Grande Estates, Rio Grande, PR · Cotswold, Charlotte, NC · Country Lakes, Miramar, FL · Countryside Woods, Vancouver, WA · Cypress-Riverside, Highland, CA · Cypresswood, Spring, TX · Dixie Downs, St. George, UT · Villa de Loiza, Rio Grande, PR · Downtown Appleton, Appleton, WI · Downtown Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Irvine Business Complex. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.