Population 11,947 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Kelseyville: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Kelseyville
Household size in Kelseyville
| Period | Kelseyville | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.56 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.61 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.49 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.43 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.12 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
The average household in Kelseyville has 2.43 people, under the U.S. average of 2.65. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.56, a much bigger shift than nationally. Kelseyville has smaller households than the great majority of California cities.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Kelseyville
| Period | Kelseyville | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 45.5 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 44.8 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 45.8 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 46.2 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +0.7 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Kelseyville skews older: half of its residents are older than 46.2, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families. Since 2006–10, the median age has crept up from 45.5, a smaller shift than nationally.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Kelseyville
| Period | Kelseyville | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.9% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 9.2% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 10.8% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 11.6% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | +3.8 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head nearly one in eight households in Kelseyville (11.6%), the same as the national share. The single-parent share has risen 3.8 points since 2006–10, even as the national share fell.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Kelseyville
Renters in Kelseyville
| Period | Kelseyville | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 24.7% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 30.8% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 24.9% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 26.8% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +2.1 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
More than a quarter of households in Kelseyville rent their homes (26.8%), below the national share of 34.8%; the rest own. Among homeowners, 47.6% have no mortgage at all, above the national share of 39.8%. Rentals cluster in the northwest; owners are most common in the east. The renter share has risen 2.1 points since 2006–10, mirroring the country.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Kelseyville
| Period | Kelseyville | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 23.3% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 21.0% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 23.7% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 21.1% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −2.2 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 21.1% of the housing in Kelseyville, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand. Vacancy is down 2.2 points from 2006–10, in line with the national trend.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Kelseyville
| Period | Kelseyville | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1980 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1980 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1984 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1983 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +3 | +4 | +6 |
The typical home in Kelseyville was built around 1983, about the same vintage as the country's housing overall (1980). Homes here are newer than in California as a whole, where the median home dates to 1976.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Kelseyville
| Period | Kelseyville | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,059 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,084 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,419 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,384 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$325 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in Kelseyville runs $1,384 a month at the median, utilities included, below the U.S. median of $1,571. Rents are up $325 a month from 2006–10, a 31% rise, a slower climb than the nation's. Rent takes 30.6% of the typical renter's income, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent. Rents run highest in the southeast and lowest in the northwest.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Kelseyville
Bachelor's degrees in Kelseyville
| Period | Kelseyville | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.7% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 16.0% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 18.1% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 21.9% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +1.2 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Kelseyville: 21.9% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%. Since 2006–10, the share with a degree has edged up 1.2 points, a smaller shift than nationally. College graduates are most concentrated in the northeast and least in the northwest.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Kelseyville
| Period | Kelseyville | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 89.3% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 86.4% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 88.4% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 84.5% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | −4.8 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
Just over one in seven adults in Kelseyville never finished high school, more than nationally: 84.5% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% across the U.S. The picture is much the same across California. The share with a diploma has fallen 4.8 points since 2006–10, even as the national rate rose.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Kelseyville
| Period | Kelseyville | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.6% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 15.6% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 7.3% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 12.0% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −0.6 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Finding work has been harder in Kelseyville: 12.0% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well above the national rate of 5.4%. Of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people, only 35 have higher unemployment. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Kelseyville compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelseyville | 2.43 | 46.2 | 11.6% | 26.8% | 21.1% | 1983 | $1,384 | 21.9% | 84.5% | 12.0% |
| Soda Bay | 2.90 | 43.9 | 9.2% | 13.8% | 13.7% | 1985 | $1,418 | 23.3% | 89.0% | 9.3% |
| Glenhaven | 1.93 | 57.0 | 4.4% | 22.1% | 41.4% | 1984 | $1,461 | 32.6% | 98.0% | 24.7% |
| Finley | 2.98 | 48.7 | 12.1% | 18.4% | 15.7% | 1985 | $1,051 | 22.8% | 89.3% | 18.5% |
| Clearlake Park | 1.99 | 52.2 | 8.9% | 17.8% | 52.1% | 1971 | $1,364 | 23.1% | 97.4% | 17.6% |
| Seigler Springs | 2.41 | 48.3 | 10.8% | 32.0% | 23.7% | 1986 | $1,491 | 30.7% | 85.1% | 9.6% |
| Lucerne | 2.38 | 41.1 | 11.0% | 30.0% | 29.5% | 1972 | $1,561 | 5.7% | 92.3% | 7.5% |
| Clearlake | 2.80 | 38.2 | 18.9% | 40.1% | 19.8% | 1977 | $1,376 | 8.6% | 80.0% | 14.8% |
| Clearlake Oaks | 2.10 | 56.9 | 7.6% | 28.2% | 27.3% | 1979 | $1,457 | 16.2% | 93.8% | 14.3% |
| Cobb | 2.35 | 55.5 | 14.2% | 6.0% | 35.0% | 1972 | $1,376 | 34.9% | 94.2% | 9.8% |
| Lakeport | 2.56 | 45.5 | 8.8% | 22.7% | 13.5% | 1978 | $1,455 | 20.0% | 90.3% | 6.6% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Wallingford, PA · Chillicothe, IL · Chillicothe, MO · Church Point, LA · Circle Pines, MN · Citrus Springs, FL · Clarkesville, GA · Clarksville, MD · Clawson, MI · Clay, NY
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Kelseyville. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.