Population 230 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Latrobe: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Latrobe
Household size in Latrobe
| Period | Latrobe | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.52 | 2.76 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.80 | 2.81 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.96 | 2.82 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.86 | 2.83 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.33 | +0.07 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
The typical household in Latrobe holds 2.86 people, more than the U.S. average of 2.65. The picture is much the same across the Sacramento area. Household size has climbed from 2.52 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Latrobe
| Period | Latrobe | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 36.8 | 36.7 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 38.4 | 37.6 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 39.9 | 38.7 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 45.8 | 39.6 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +8.9 | +2.9 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Latrobe skews older: half of its residents are older than 45.8, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Latrobe
| Period | Latrobe | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.7% | 12.8% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 8.3% | 12.9% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 6.4% | 11.5% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.6% | 11.0% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | −8.1 pts | −1.7 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Latrobe: 3.6% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Latrobe
Renters in Latrobe
| Period | Latrobe | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 38.4% | 37.3% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 25.5% | 40.4% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 30.7% | 39.7% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 2.5% | 37.0% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | −35.9 pts | −0.3 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 2.5% of households in Latrobe rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 18.0% have no mortgage at all, well below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Latrobe
| Period | Latrobe | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.4% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 4.4% | 8.7% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 8.0% | 6.7% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 6.1% | 6.7% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −0.3 pts | −2.6 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Fewer homes sit empty in Latrobe than nationally: 6.1%, against 9.6% for the U.S. The picture is much the same across the Sacramento area.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Latrobe
| Period | Latrobe | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1998 | 1980 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1999 | 1981 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 2003 | 1982 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 2007 | 1985 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +9 | +5 | +4 | +6 |
Latrobe has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 2007, versus 1980 nationally.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Latrobe
| Period | Latrobe | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,138 | $1,199 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,115 | $1,254 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,728 | $1,488 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,803 | $2,018 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$665 | +$818 | +$931 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Latrobe costs $1,803 a month with utilities, above the national median of $1,571. Locally, though, rents here are lower than in the Sacramento area overall ($2,018). Rent takes 29.4% of the typical renter's income, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Latrobe
Bachelor's degrees in Latrobe
| Period | Latrobe | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 43.7% | 30.1% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 42.7% | 30.6% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 43.7% | 33.6% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 50.8% | 37.4% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
College graduates are unusually common in Latrobe: 50.8% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's degree or higher, against 35.6% nationally. Education tends to track local incomes and the kinds of jobs nearby.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Latrobe
| Period | Latrobe | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 93.7% | 86.8% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 95.1% | 87.6% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 90.7% | 89.0% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 95.9% | 89.9% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +2.2 pts | +3.1 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion is high in Latrobe: 95.9% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Latrobe
| Period | Latrobe | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.1% | 9.7% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 8.6% | 12.4% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.4% | 6.1% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.5% | 6.2% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −3.6 pts | −3.5 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
The job market in Latrobe has been strong: just 2.5% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Latrobe compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latrobe | 2.86 | 45.8 | 3.6% | 2.5% | 6.1% | 2007 | $1,803 | 50.8% | 95.9% | 2.5% |
| Sloughhouse | 2.41 | 57.3 | 9.7% | 1.1% | 1.2% | 1990 | $2,229 | 46.0% | 94.9% | 4.5% |
| Shingle Springs | 2.79 | 47.8 | 4.4% | 14.7% | 5.8% | 1991 | $1,992 | 46.1% | 97.0% | 3.1% |
| Plymouth | 2.54 | 48.9 | 11.4% | 10.3% | 11.9% | 1986 | $1,450 | 28.8% | 89.3% | 5.1% |
| Nashville | 2.69 | 50.2 | 10.8% | 8.4% | 2.3% | 1981 | $2,616 | 34.6% | 95.6% | 4.9% |
| Drytown | 2.29 | 55.1 | 12.8% | 11.5% | 12.9% | 1987 | $1,577 | 27.2% | 88.5% | 5.3% |
| Cameron Park | 2.62 | 45.6 | 9.5% | 26.7% | 4.8% | 1990 | $1,879 | 41.3% | 96.7% | 5.0% |
| Carbondale | 2.71 | 44.9 | 4.6% | 8.3% | 3.5% | 1985 | $1,308 | 9.3% | 65.7% | 16.5% |
| El Dorado | 2.58 | 50.9 | 11.9% | 16.2% | 5.6% | 1983 | $2,339 | 35.4% | 95.2% | 6.1% |
| El Dorado Hills | 2.85 | 46.2 | 7.0% | 13.8% | 4.7% | 1999 | $2,807 | 60.3% | 98.2% | 4.0% |
| Outingdale | 2.77 | 46.3 | 8.1% | 26.9% | 9.8% | 1982 | $1,205 | 15.9% | 94.8% | 11.1% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Sanbourn, PA · Mace, WV · Madie, TN · Main City, MO · Maloneton, KY · Rural Vale, TN · Russell Hill, TN · Rye, AR · Rye Cove, VA · Sailor Springs, IL
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Latrobe. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.