Population 652 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Level Green: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Level Green
Household size in Level Green
| Period | Level Green | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.58 | 2.37 | 2.51 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.59 | 2.35 | 2.53 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.49 | 2.29 | 2.50 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.88 | 2.30 | 2.46 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.31 | −0.07 | −0.05 | −0.03 |
The typical household in Level Green holds 2.88 people, more than the U.S. average of 2.65. Household size has climbed from 2.58 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Level Green
| Period | Level Green | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 44.6 | 42.5 | 40.3 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 43.6 | 43.0 | 41.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 49.1 | 43.7 | 41.8 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 41.1 | 43.9 | 42.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | −3.5 | +1.4 | +1.7 | +2.3 |
Half of the people in Level Green are younger than 41.1 and half are older, close to the national median of 40.1. The population here is younger than in the Pittsburgh area overall, where the median age is 43.9.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Level Green
| Period | Level Green | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.8% | 8.9% | 10.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 6.0% | 8.8% | 10.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 7.7% | 8.4% | 10.5% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.8% | 8.8% | 10.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | −5.0 pts | −0.0 pts | +0.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 3.8% of households in Level Green, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Level Green
Renters in Level Green
| Period | Level Green | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.0% | 28.5% | 29.0% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 6.7% | 29.9% | 30.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 4.5% | 30.3% | 31.1% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 0.2% | 29.3% | 30.7% | 34.8% |
| Change | −8.7 pts | +0.8 pts | +1.7 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 0.2% of households in Level Green rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. About three in ten owners (30.6%) have paid off their mortgages, below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Level Green
| Period | Level Green | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1.7% | 10.7% | 10.3% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 5.4% | 10.4% | 10.5% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 6.5% | 10.5% | 10.7% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 4.6% | 10.0% | 9.1% | 9.6% |
| Change | +3.0 pts | −0.7 pts | −1.2 pts | −1.8 pts |
Only 4.6% of homes in Level Green are vacant, far below the national rate of 9.6%, which usually means strong demand for housing.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Level Green
| Period | Level Green | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1959 | 1960 | 1963 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1967 | 1961 | 1964 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1971 | 1962 | 1965 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 2002 | 1964 | 1967 | 1980 |
| Change | +44 | +4 | +4 | +6 |
Much of the housing in Level Green is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 2002, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Level Green
| Period | Level Green | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $629 | $720 | $829 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,024 | $801 | $923 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $819 | $922 | $1,039 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $909 | $1,162 | $1,323 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$280 | +$442 | +$494 | +$606 |
The median renter in Level Green pays $909 a month for rent and utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 17.9% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Level Green
Bachelor's degrees in Level Green
| Period | Level Green | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 28.1% | 29.5% | 27.2% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 31.6% | 31.7% | 28.7% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 32.6% | 35.2% | 31.8% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 46.8% | 39.0% | 35.6% | 35.6% |
| Change | +18.7 pts | +9.5 pts | +8.3 pts | +7.2 pts |
College graduates are unusually common in Level Green: 46.8% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's degree or higher, against 35.6% nationally. Education tends to track local incomes and the kinds of jobs nearby.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Level Green
| Period | Level Green | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 97.0% | 90.8% | 87.3% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 96.9% | 92.3% | 88.8% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 99.8% | 93.8% | 90.3% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 98.7% | 95.0% | 91.8% | 89.3% |
| Change | +1.7 pts | +4.2 pts | +4.5 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Level Green: 98.7% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Level Green
| Period | Level Green | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.0% | 6.9% | 7.5% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 4.6% | 7.5% | 8.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 1.6% | 4.9% | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 0.0% | 5.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% |
| Change | −3.0 pts | −1.9 pts | −2.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
The survey found almost no one in Level Green out of work and looking, against 5.4% of the labor force nationally. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Level Green compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level Green | 2.88 | 41.1 | 3.8% | 0.2% | 4.6% | 2002 | $909 | 46.8% | 98.7% | 0.0% |
| Trafford | 2.46 | 44.9 | 10.5% | 11.8% | 8.5% | 1962 | $992 | 43.9% | 94.8% | 1.4% |
| Ardara | 2.18 | 51.4 | 7.4% | 5.2% | 13.2% | 1949 | $1,300 | 18.7% | 91.2% | 0.0% |
| Larimer | 2.32 | 39.5 | 7.8% | 16.9% | 10.3% | 1960 | $1,159 | 35.1% | 96.9% | 10.7% |
| North Irwin | 1.89 | 40.8 | 7.2% | 40.1% | 2.9% | 1943 | $846 | 21.2% | 92.6% | 2.4% |
| Harrison City | 2.47 | 44.8 | 4.9% | 13.0% | 4.0% | 1990 | $1,324 | 46.6% | 99.2% | 1.8% |
| Manor | 2.70 | 43.2 | 10.9% | 7.4% | 1.4% | 1970 | $856 | 43.6% | 98.8% | 9.4% |
| Pitcairn | 2.30 | 38.4 | 18.3% | 60.8% | 21.6% | 1958 | $798 | 15.4% | 94.9% | 9.9% |
| Wall | 1.96 | 34.7 | 15.0% | 39.7% | 18.5% | 1938 | $1,160 | 12.9% | 93.0% | 3.7% |
| Irwin | 2.42 | 46.0 | 7.1% | 15.1% | 5.4% | 1972 | $1,185 | 42.0% | 97.3% | 4.1% |
| Westmoreland City | 2.57 | 41.0 | 5.2% | 4.2% | 1.7% | 1982 | $854 | 48.8% | 99.0% | 7.1% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Glen Arbor, MI · South Otselic, NY · Shorecrest, MI · Shopville, KY · Shiro, TX · Selica, NC · Goodman, WI · Golden Shores, AZ · Glen Elder, KS · Springfield, ME
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Level Green. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.