Population 8,660 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Mango: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Mango
Household size in Mango
| Period | Mango | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.85 | 2.49 | 2.63 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.82 | 2.56 | 2.73 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.67 | 2.59 | 2.75 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.61 | 2.55 | 2.63 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.23 | +0.06 | +0.00 | −0.03 |
Households in Mango average 2.61 people, about the same as the country as a whole (2.65). Household size has dropped from 2.85 in 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Mango
| Period | Mango | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 32.1 | 41.2 | 40.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 33.8 | 42.3 | 42.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 36.5 | 43.2 | 43.0 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 37.6 | 43.1 | 43.5 | 40.1 |
| Change | +5.4 | +1.9 | +2.7 | +2.3 |
Mango is a little younger than the country as a whole: its median age is 37.6, against 40.1 nationally. The median age has climbed from 32.1 in 2006–10, mirroring the country. Residents skew youngest in the northwest and oldest in the center.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Mango
| Period | Mango | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 23.5% | 12.0% | 12.4% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 19.8% | 11.9% | 12.2% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 17.0% | 11.2% | 11.5% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 16.1% | 10.7% | 11.4% | 11.6% |
| Change | −7.4 pts | −1.3 pts | −1.0 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are common in Mango: 16.1% of all households, against 11.6% nationally. Since 2006–10, the single-parent share has fallen 7.4 points, a much bigger shift than nationally. Mango has a higher share of single-parent households than at least four in five Florida cities.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Mango
Renters in Mango
| Period | Mango | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 42.2% | 30.3% | 30.3% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 44.0% | 34.7% | 33.9% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 48.5% | 35.1% | 34.6% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 37.8% | 32.1% | 32.4% | 34.8% |
| Change | −4.4 pts | +1.8 pts | +2.1 pts | +1.5 pts |
Renting in Mango is about as common as it is nationally: 37.8% of households rent, against 34.8%. Renters make up a bigger share here than in the Tampa area as a whole (32.1%). Among homeowners, 38.6% have no mortgage at all, about the same as nationally. The renter share has fallen 4.4 points since 2006–10, even as the national share rose.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Mango
| Period | Mango | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.3% | 15.2% | 17.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 13.1% | 15.4% | 17.6% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 13.5% | 13.4% | 15.4% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 11.6% | 11.0% | 12.5% | 9.6% |
| Change | +0.3 pts | −4.2 pts | −4.8 pts | −1.8 pts |
A few more homes sit empty in Mango than nationally: 11.6%, against 9.6%. The count includes vacation homes and homes between owners or tenants, not just abandoned ones. The Tampa area as a whole looks much the same.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Mango
| Period | Mango | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1983 | 1982 | 1984 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1982 | 1983 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1981 | 1984 | 1986 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1986 | 1988 | 1989 | 1980 |
| Change | +3 | +5 | +5 | +6 |
Homes in Mango are newer than the national norm: the median home was built in 1986, versus 1980 across the U.S. The median year built has moved up from 1983 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building. The newest homes are mostly in the southwest, the oldest in the southeast.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Mango
| Period | Mango | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $823 | $1,036 | $1,092 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $854 | $1,069 | $1,123 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $982 | $1,244 | $1,323 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,299 | $1,767 | $1,816 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$477 | +$731 | +$724 | +$606 |
The median renter in Mango pays $1,299 a month for rent and utilities, below the national median of $1,571. Rent has climbed $477 a month since 2006–10, up 58%, a slower climb than the nation's. The typical renter here spends 33.3% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Mango
Bachelor's degrees in Mango
| Period | Mango | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.9% | 26.6% | 26.4% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 15.0% | 27.1% | 27.0% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 13.7% | 30.4% | 30.0% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 16.5% | 35.2% | 34.6% | 35.6% |
| Change | +7.6 pts | +8.6 pts | +8.2 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Mango have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 16.5%, against 35.6% nationally. The share with a degree is up 7.6 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country. College graduates are most concentrated in the northeast and least in the southeast.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Mango
| Period | Mango | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 80.3% | 86.7% | 85.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 81.0% | 87.9% | 86.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 77.7% | 89.4% | 88.2% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 79.2% | 90.9% | 90.0% | 89.3% |
| Change | −1.1 pts | +4.2 pts | +4.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
Just over one in five adults in Mango never finished high school, well above the national share: only 79.2% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally. Since 2006–10, the share with a diploma has edged down 1.1 points, even as the national rate rose. Of the 512 Florida cities with 5,000+ people, only 43 have a lower share of high school graduates.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Mango
| Period | Mango | Tampa area | Florida | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.3% | 8.7% | 8.9% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 11.8% | 10.6% | 11.0% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.1% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.6% | 4.7% | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| Change | −0.7 pts | −4.1 pts | −4.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
At 5.6%, unemployment in Mango is close to the national rate of 5.4%. The rate is higher than in the Tampa area as a whole (4.7%). Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Mango compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mango | 2.61 | 37.6 | 16.1% | 37.8% | 11.6% | 1986 | $1,299 | 16.5% | 79.2% | 5.6% |
| Seffner | 3.03 | 39.9 | 9.9% | 17.4% | 8.1% | 1992 | $1,826 | 29.7% | 87.2% | 3.8% |
| East Lake-Orient Park | 2.62 | 33.6 | 18.5% | 50.5% | 6.5% | 1983 | $1,490 | 24.7% | 86.7% | 5.6% |
| Brandon | 2.68 | 38.7 | 15.7% | 42.3% | 8.2% | 1990 | $1,839 | 31.8% | 89.7% | 4.8% |
| Dover | 2.96 | 41.8 | 8.2% | 23.0% | 8.7% | 1995 | $1,493 | 26.2% | 83.5% | 3.6% |
| Temple Terrace | 2.39 | 35.1 | 13.4% | 50.3% | 7.0% | 1980 | $1,585 | 40.3% | 90.5% | 4.9% |
| Valrico | 2.79 | 43.9 | 8.6% | 20.8% | 5.4% | 1994 | $2,092 | 38.8% | 91.9% | 3.7% |
| Palm River-Clair Mel | 3.04 | 34.5 | 20.1% | 37.1% | 7.9% | 1989 | $1,688 | 24.2% | 80.9% | 5.3% |
| Thonotosassa | 2.84 | 39.0 | 13.0% | 36.7% | 10.2% | 1995 | $1,309 | 34.6% | 85.3% | 7.9% |
| Bloomingdale | 2.84 | 44.7 | 7.5% | 18.1% | 6.0% | 1991 | $2,226 | 44.6% | 94.8% | 4.1% |
| Durant | 2.65 | 38.0 | 1.8% | 28.4% | 5.0% | 2000 | $1,380 | 28.8% | 84.0% | 3.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Conifer, CO · Cuero, TX · Crossett, AR · Crittenden, KY · Cresskill, NJ · Crandall, TX · Cottleville, MO · Cornelia, GA · Coopersville, MI · Conning Towers Nautilus Park, CT
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Mango. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.