Population 103 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Mount Carmel: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Mount Carmel
Household size in Mount Carmel
| Period | Mount Carmel | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.13 | 3.21 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.47 | 3.28 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.64 | 3.25 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.73 | 3.11 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.59 | −0.09 | −0.03 |
At 2.73 people per household, Mount Carmel sits close to the national average of 2.65. The typical household here is smaller than in Utah overall, where it has 3.11 people. Household size has climbed from 2.13 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Mount Carmel
| Period | Mount Carmel | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 42.8 | 29.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 47.9 | 30.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 34.3 | 32.0 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 44.7 | 33.1 | 40.1 |
| Change | +2.0 | +3.2 | +2.3 |
With a median age of 44.7, Mount Carmel is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Mount Carmel
| Period | Mount Carmel | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 14.3% | 9.1% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 5.5% | 9.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 2.8% | 9.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.3% | 8.9% | 11.6% |
| Change | −7.0 pts | −0.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Mount Carmel: 7.3% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Mount Carmel
Renters in Mount Carmel
| Period | Mount Carmel | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 31.2% | 28.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 11.9% | 30.3% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 35.2% | 29.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 4.6% | 29.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | −26.6 pts | +0.9 pts | +1.5 pts |
Mount Carmel is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 4.6% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. About seven in ten owners (68.7%) have paid off their mortgages, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Mount Carmel
| Period | Mount Carmel | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 54.5% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 60.9% | 8.3% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 64.0% | 8.0% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 56.9% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | +2.4 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Mount Carmel: 56.9% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Mount Carmel
| Period | Mount Carmel | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1983 | 1984 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1989 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1988 | 1987 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1985 | 1991 | 1980 |
| Change | +2 | +8 | +6 |
The housing in Mount Carmel is a little younger than the country's: half of it was built after 1985, against 1980 nationally. Still, homes here are older than in Utah overall, where the median home dates to 1991.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Mount Carmel
| Period | Mount Carmel | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $330 | $971 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $799 | $1,064 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $576 | $1,222 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,242 | $1,701 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$912 | +$729 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Mount Carmel costs $1,242 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rent takes 22.3% of the typical renter's income, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Mount Carmel
Bachelor's degrees in Mount Carmel
| Period | Mount Carmel | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 22.8% | 29.7% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 33.7% | 31.2% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 20.1% | 34.3% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 32.5% | 38.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +9.7 pts | +8.6 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are a little less common in Mount Carmel than nationally: 32.5% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Mount Carmel
| Period | Mount Carmel | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 94.0% | 91.1% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 95.7% | 91.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 98.1% | 92.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 93.6% | 93.5% | 89.3% |
| Change | −0.3 pts | +2.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Mount Carmel is above the national rate: 93.6% of adults have a diploma, against 89.3%. The picture is much the same across Utah.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Mount Carmel
| Period | Mount Carmel | Utah | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 8.1% | 5.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 10.4% | 6.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.5% | 3.6% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 1.9% | 3.5% | 5.4% |
| Change | −6.1 pts | −2.3 pts | −2.7 pts |
The job market in Mount Carmel has been strong: just 1.9% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Mount Carmel compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mount Carmel | 2.73 | 44.7 | 7.3% | 4.6% | 56.9% | 1985 | $1,242 | 32.5% | 93.6% | 1.9% |
| Orderville | 3.37 | 28.0 | 7.2% | 7.9% | 30.7% | 1979 | $1,242 | 33.4% | 89.3% | 1.4% |
| Glendale | 3.34 | 28.9 | 7.2% | 7.7% | 32.1% | 1979 | $1,242 | 33.4% | 89.5% | 1.4% |
| Mount Carmel Junction | 3.22 | 31.9 | 7.2% | 7.1% | 36.9% | 1981 | $1,242 | 33.2% | 90.3% | 1.5% |
| Springdale | 1.76 | 54.3 | 10.5% | 31.1% | 28.1% | 1989 | $1,132 | 36.2% | 94.6% | 5.9% |
| Rockville | 2.69 | 47.5 | 16.4% | 29.6% | 22.7% | 1990 | $1,240 | 32.2% | 91.7% | 6.7% |
| Virgin | 3.19 | 37.8 | 8.7% | 7.4% | 55.9% | 1990 | $2,022 | 28.8% | 92.6% | 1.9% |
| Toquerville | 3.60 | 36.9 | 3.1% | 8.0% | 9.2% | 2001 | $1,006 | 34.8% | 97.3% | 2.9% |
| La Verkin | 3.38 | 32.1 | 7.0% | 20.6% | 11.0% | 1998 | $1,362 | 25.6% | 94.1% | 4.9% |
| Hurricane | 2.70 | 44.6 | 5.8% | 25.3% | 11.8% | 2003 | $1,474 | 29.5% | 96.0% | 3.7% |
| Leeds | 2.34 | 58.7 | 0.6% | 15.0% | 28.4% | 1995 | $1,233 | 24.5% | 95.6% | 0.6% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Smithfield, MO · Loveland, OK · Lucia, CA · Luke, MD · Lyford, IN · Silver, TX · Sizerville, PA · Skamokawa Valley, WA · Slapout, OK · Slater, CO
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Mount Carmel. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.