Population 30 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Naomi: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Naomi
Household size in Naomi
| Period | Naomi | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1.93 | 2.37 | 2.51 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 1.97 | 2.35 | 2.53 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.21 | 2.29 | 2.50 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.05 | 2.30 | 2.46 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.12 | −0.07 | −0.05 | −0.03 |
Households in Naomi are small: just 2.05 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 1.93, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Naomi
| Period | Naomi | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 57.4 | 42.5 | 40.3 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 53.2 | 43.0 | 41.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 49.0 | 43.7 | 41.8 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 50.7 | 43.9 | 42.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | −6.7 | +1.4 | +1.7 | +2.3 |
With a median age of 50.7, Naomi is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Naomi
| Period | Naomi | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.4% | 8.9% | 10.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 3.7% | 8.8% | 10.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 5.5% | 8.4% | 10.5% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 4.4% | 8.8% | 10.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | −3.0 pts | −0.0 pts | +0.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Naomi: 4.4% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Naomi
Renters in Naomi
| Period | Naomi | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.2% | 28.5% | 29.0% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 27.8% | 29.9% | 30.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 13.7% | 30.3% | 31.1% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 11.6% | 29.3% | 30.7% | 34.8% |
| Change | +1.4 pts | +0.8 pts | +1.7 pts | +1.5 pts |
Only 11.6% of households in Naomi rent their homes, far below the national share of 34.8%, so most residents are owners who tend to stay put. Among homeowners, 63.6% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Naomi
| Period | Naomi | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.2% | 10.7% | 10.3% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 7.2% | 10.4% | 10.5% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 5.2% | 10.5% | 10.7% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 16.9% | 10.0% | 9.1% | 9.6% |
| Change | +11.8 pts | −0.7 pts | −1.2 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Naomi: 16.9% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Naomi
| Period | Naomi | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1952 | 1960 | 1963 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1957 | 1961 | 1964 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1954 | 1962 | 1965 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1956 | 1964 | 1967 | 1980 |
| Change | +4 | +4 | +4 | +6 |
Naomi is a place of older homes: half were built before 1956, while the national median is 1980. That means established neighborhoods, and more houses that may need updating.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Naomi
| Period | Naomi | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $689 | $720 | $829 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $640 | $801 | $923 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $787 | $922 | $1,039 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $863 | $1,162 | $1,323 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$174 | +$442 | +$494 | +$606 |
Rent in Naomi runs $863 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. Rent takes 27.1% of the typical renter's income, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Naomi
Bachelor's degrees in Naomi
| Period | Naomi | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 14.3% | 29.5% | 27.2% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 17.9% | 31.7% | 28.7% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 13.1% | 35.2% | 31.8% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 18.1% | 39.0% | 35.6% | 35.6% |
| Change | +3.7 pts | +9.5 pts | +8.3 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Naomi: 18.1% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Naomi
| Period | Naomi | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 85.6% | 90.8% | 87.3% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 96.0% | 92.3% | 88.8% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 89.0% | 93.8% | 90.3% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 91.7% | 95.0% | 91.8% | 89.3% |
| Change | +6.1 pts | +4.2 pts | +4.5 pts | +4.3 pts |
About nine in ten adults in Naomi have finished high school (91.7%), a bit above the national rate of 89.3%. Even so, the rate is lower than in the Pittsburgh area as a whole (95.0%).
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Naomi
| Period | Naomi | Pittsburgh area | Pennsylvania | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.9% | 6.9% | 7.5% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 4.0% | 7.5% | 8.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.8% | 4.9% | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 12.2% | 5.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% |
| Change | +7.3 pts | −1.9 pts | −2.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
Finding work has been harder in Naomi: 12.2% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well above the national rate of 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Naomi compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi | 2.05 | 50.7 | 4.4% | 11.6% | 16.9% | 1956 | $863 | 18.1% | 91.7% | 12.2% |
| Dunlevy | 1.96 | 52.7 | 9.8% | 29.1% | 11.2% | 1954 | $1,109 | 21.3% | 95.5% | 10.2% |
| Arnold City | 2.21 | 35.7 | 22.3% | 60.8% | 2.2% | 1957 | $676 | 10.2% | 97.1% | 4.0% |
| Lynnwood-Pricedale | 2.02 | 44.4 | 15.3% | 32.5% | 13.3% | 1956 | $765 | 15.0% | 97.2% | 4.5% |
| Allenport | 2.07 | 47.2 | 9.9% | 22.7% | 13.9% | 1948 | $999 | 21.4% | 97.4% | 8.0% |
| Fayette City | 2.09 | 48.2 | 5.6% | 15.4% | 10.2% | 1955 | $803 | 24.6% | 95.1% | 8.5% |
| Stockdale | 1.70 | 43.5 | 2.4% | 18.4% | 8.9% | 1955 | $758 | 43.9% | 99.0% | 10.4% |
| North Belle Vernon | 2.04 | 48.1 | 22.2% | 36.3% | 13.3% | 1944 | $940 | 27.6% | 96.4% | 5.8% |
| Speers | 2.22 | 45.9 | 6.9% | 6.5% | 10.1% | 1953 | $1,058 | 35.3% | 97.2% | 2.8% |
| Pricedale | 1.95 | 48.6 | 11.4% | 23.3% | 18.1% | 1958 | $831 | 20.7% | 97.8% | 2.2% |
| Long Branch | 2.15 | 49.4 | 10.6% | 13.9% | 10.3% | 1956 | $950 | 26.5% | 96.4% | 5.6% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Kerrick, TX · Stiritz, IL · Stevens Village, AK · Stetsonville, NY · Steenson Hollow, AL · Stanwood, NY · Stanfield, TX · St. Huberts, NY · South Pass City, WY · Sneedville, TX
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Naomi. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.