Population 459 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Natural Bridge: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Natural Bridge
Household size in Natural Bridge
| Period | Natural Bridge | Alabama | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.77 | 2.55 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.43 | 2.58 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.63 | 2.58 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.50 | 2.56 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.28 | +0.00 | −0.03 |
The average household in Natural Bridge has 2.50 people, a bit under the U.S. average of 2.65. The picture is much the same across Alabama. Household size has dropped from 2.77 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Natural Bridge
| Period | Natural Bridge | Alabama | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 39.7 | 38.2 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 44.1 | 39.1 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 48.6 | 40.1 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 43.1 | 40.2 | 40.1 |
| Change | +3.4 | +2.0 | +2.3 |
Natural Bridge skews older than the country: its median age is 43.1, against 40.1 nationally.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Natural Bridge
| Period | Natural Bridge | Alabama | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.6% | 12.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 23.4% | 12.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 5.6% | 11.8% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.2% | 12.2% | 11.6% |
| Change | −4.4 pts | −0.3 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Natural Bridge: 7.2% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Natural Bridge
Renters in Natural Bridge
| Period | Natural Bridge | Alabama | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 37.8% | 28.9% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 24.9% | 30.8% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 19.8% | 31.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 19.6% | 29.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | −18.2 pts | +0.9 pts | +1.5 pts |
Natural Bridge is largely a place of homeowners: only 19.6% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Nearly two-thirds of owners (64.4%) have paid off their mortgages, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Natural Bridge
| Period | Natural Bridge | Alabama | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 17.6% | 14.0% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 29.6% | 14.6% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 22.3% | 15.7% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 24.1% | 13.5% | 9.6% |
| Change | +6.5 pts | −0.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacant homes make up 24.1% of the housing in Natural Bridge, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Natural Bridge
| Period | Natural Bridge | Alabama | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1982 | 1980 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1981 | 1982 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1981 | 1983 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1988 | 1986 | 1980 |
| Change | +6 | +6 | +6 |
Natural Bridge has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1988, versus 1980 nationally. That is in line with the rest of Alabama.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Natural Bridge
| Period | Natural Bridge | Alabama | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $429 | $716 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $531 | $785 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $428 | $858 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $677 | $1,091 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$248 | +$375 | +$606 |
Rent in Natural Bridge runs $677 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 19.8% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Natural Bridge
Bachelor's degrees in Natural Bridge
| Period | Natural Bridge | Alabama | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.0% | 23.3% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 6.4% | 24.3% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 9.0% | 26.2% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 6.8% | 29.0% | 35.6% |
| Change | +3.8 pts | +5.7 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Natural Bridge: 6.8% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Natural Bridge
| Period | Natural Bridge | Alabama | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 54.0% | 82.3% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 64.7% | 84.3% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 79.3% | 86.4% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 78.2% | 88.7% | 89.3% |
| Change | +24.3 pts | +6.4 pts | +4.3 pts |
More than one in five adults in Natural Bridge never finished high school, well above the national share: only 78.2% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Natural Bridge
| Period | Natural Bridge | Alabama | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 9.0% | 8.6% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 9.7% | 10.2% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 17.1% | 6.1% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 1.4% | 4.9% | 5.4% |
| Change | −7.6 pts | −3.7 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Natural Bridge has been low: just 1.4% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Natural Bridge compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Bridge | 2.50 | 43.1 | 7.2% | 19.6% | 24.1% | 1988 | $677 | 6.8% | 78.2% | 1.4% |
| Lynn | 2.45 | 42.0 | 13.3% | 18.7% | 17.4% | 1987 | $714 | 6.5% | 74.9% | 1.7% |
| Boar Tush | 2.28 | 50.2 | 14.6% | 17.8% | 28.9% | 1979 | $783 | 5.4% | 71.4% | 1.9% |
| DeFoor | 2.20 | 50.5 | 11.3% | 21.0% | 21.2% | 1983 | $720 | 14.1% | 77.3% | 0.8% |
| Whitehouse | 2.41 | 47.2 | 13.0% | 9.9% | 40.3% | 1982 | $775 | 5.5% | 74.9% | 2.8% |
| Gold Mine | 2.89 | 30.7 | 4.7% | 9.8% | 42.7% | 1991 | $463 | 13.0% | 81.3% | 6.1% |
| South Haleyville | 2.99 | 41.1 | 10.6% | 7.8% | 15.1% | 1982 | $679 | 10.6% | 81.3% | 0.0% |
| Piney Grove | 2.81 | 32.0 | 6.0% | 5.3% | 31.4% | 1983 | $481 | 11.7% | 80.8% | 5.5% |
| Haleyville | 2.59 | 42.8 | 10.0% | 30.7% | 21.7% | 1979 | $765 | 11.6% | 75.6% | 5.1% |
| Brilliant | 2.55 | 42.4 | 8.2% | 28.7% | 24.5% | 1977 | $530 | 9.2% | 81.2% | 6.0% |
| Delmar | 3.01 | 38.8 | 7.4% | 20.6% | 13.1% | 1985 | $703 | 16.4% | 82.2% | 6.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Stotonic Village, AZ · East Litchfield, CT · East Woodstock, CT · Eddy, NY · Edgefield, OH · El Duende, NM · Elk Creek, CA · Ellenburg, NY · Standard, IL · Ste. Marie, IL
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Natural Bridge. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.