Population 301 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of New Harmony: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in New Harmony
Household size in New Harmony
| Period | New Harmony | Cincinnati area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.71 | 2.59 | 2.51 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.66 | 2.61 | 2.51 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.41 | 2.55 | 2.47 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.39 | 2.55 | 2.46 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.32 | −0.04 | −0.05 | −0.03 |
New Harmony is a place of small households, averaging 2.39 people against 2.65 for the U.S., which points to many singles, couples and roommates and relatively few children. Household size has dropped from 2.71 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in New Harmony
| Period | New Harmony | Cincinnati area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 41.1 | 37.6 | 39.0 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 41.1 | 38.6 | 40.0 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 45.1 | 39.4 | 40.7 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 45.7 | 39.5 | 40.8 | 40.1 |
| Change | +4.7 | +1.9 | +1.8 | +2.3 |
New Harmony skews older: half of its residents are older than 45.7, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in New Harmony
| Period | New Harmony | Cincinnati area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.3% | 11.8% | 11.7% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 14.5% | 12.0% | 11.9% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 7.5% | 11.6% | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 11.4% | 11.4% | 11.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | +1.1 pts | −0.4 pts | −0.0 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are about as common in New Harmony as they are nationally: 11.4%, against 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in New Harmony
Renters in New Harmony
| Period | New Harmony | Cincinnati area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.1% | 30.9% | 30.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 22.9% | 32.8% | 33.1% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 24.7% | 33.6% | 33.9% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 27.9% | 31.7% | 32.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | +7.7 pts | +0.8 pts | +2.0 pts | +1.5 pts |
More than a quarter of households in New Harmony rent their homes (27.9%), below the national share of 34.8%; the rest own. Just over four in ten owners (42.0%) have paid off their mortgages, about the same as nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in New Harmony
| Period | New Harmony | Cincinnati area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.0% | 10.9% | 10.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 6.2% | 10.7% | 10.8% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 8.2% | 9.0% | 10.2% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 5.4% | 7.2% | 8.7% | 9.6% |
| Change | −4.6 pts | −3.7 pts | −2.2 pts | −1.8 pts |
Only 5.4% of homes in New Harmony are vacant, far below the national rate of 9.6%, which usually means strong demand for housing.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in New Harmony
| Period | New Harmony | Cincinnati area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1982 | 1973 | 1968 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1984 | 1973 | 1969 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1989 | 1974 | 1970 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1989 | 1977 | 1972 | 1980 |
| Change | +7 | +4 | +4 | +6 |
New Harmony has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1989, versus 1980 nationally.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in New Harmony
| Period | New Harmony | Cincinnati area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $762 | $826 | $765 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $518 | $888 | $814 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $695 | $987 | $901 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $964 | $1,263 | $1,142 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$201 | +$437 | +$377 | +$606 |
Rent in New Harmony runs $964 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 35.5% of household income on rent, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in New Harmony
Bachelor's degrees in New Harmony
| Period | New Harmony | Cincinnati area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.1% | 29.2% | 25.4% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 16.3% | 30.8% | 26.5% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 10.9% | 34.1% | 28.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 9.1% | 37.0% | 31.9% | 35.6% |
| Change | −1.0 pts | +7.8 pts | +6.5 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in New Harmony have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 9.1%, against 35.6% nationally.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in New Harmony
| Period | New Harmony | Cincinnati area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 86.6% | 87.7% | 87.7% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 84.3% | 89.3% | 88.9% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 87.2% | 91.1% | 90.4% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 88.7% | 92.4% | 91.7% | 89.3% |
| Change | +2.1 pts | +4.7 pts | +4.0 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in New Harmony is close to the national rate: 88.7% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%. The rate is lower than in the Cincinnati area overall (92.4%).
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in New Harmony
| Period | New Harmony | Cincinnati area | Ohio | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.7% | 7.5% | 8.7% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 10.1% | 8.6% | 9.4% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 1.9% | 4.7% | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.7% | 4.5% | 4.9% | 5.4% |
| Change | −4.0 pts | −3.0 pts | −3.8 pts | −2.7 pts |
Jobs have been easier to find in New Harmony than nationally: unemployment was 3.7%, against 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
New Harmony compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Harmony | 2.39 | 45.7 | 11.4% | 27.9% | 5.4% | 1989 | $964 | 9.1% | 88.7% | 3.7% |
| Williamsburg | 2.51 | 44.7 | 8.0% | 21.9% | 8.2% | 1979 | $971 | 14.9% | 87.3% | 4.6% |
| Locust Ridge | 2.60 | 45.5 | 4.0% | 19.9% | 4.3% | 1978 | $764 | 24.8% | 92.1% | 4.0% |
| Mount Orab | 2.75 | 36.4 | 14.8% | 25.9% | 6.8% | 1991 | $800 | 14.5% | 88.5% | 4.8% |
| Bethel | 2.58 | 42.4 | 12.2% | 24.3% | 6.9% | 1971 | $801 | 15.0% | 90.4% | 4.0% |
| Yankeetown | 2.71 | 44.6 | 8.7% | 20.2% | 27.8% | 1972 | $860 | 18.5% | 88.3% | 7.0% |
| Neals Corner | 2.47 | 45.4 | 2.8% | 14.1% | 4.1% | 1976 | $944 | 13.1% | 95.6% | 1.7% |
| Hulington | 2.71 | 34.4 | 26.3% | 37.1% | 12.1% | 1985 | $1,166 | 14.0% | 83.1% | 8.8% |
| Hamersville | 2.50 | 48.0 | 12.6% | 17.5% | 11.4% | 1977 | $823 | 11.7% | 83.0% | 4.2% |
| Five Mile | 2.78 | 44.7 | 18.8% | 21.9% | 6.8% | 1989 | $795 | 20.1% | 95.5% | 1.3% |
| Marathon | 2.50 | 50.0 | 8.8% | 13.6% | 4.2% | 1984 | $1,071 | 24.2% | 81.2% | 2.5% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Unaka, NC · Danciger, TX · Dateland, AZ · Davenport, VA · Deep Valley, WV · Downing, TX · Tampico, IN · Timberon, NM · Tisch Mills, WI · Tooley Corners, PA
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up New Harmony. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.