New Irving Park, Greensboro, NC Demographics

Population 4,813 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
New Irving Park, Greensboro, NC map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of New Irving Park: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in New Irving Park

Household size in New Irving Park

Household size, people per household
PeriodNew Irving ParkGreensboro areaNorth CarolinaU.S.
2006–102.362.482.532.68
2010–142.232.502.582.73
2015–192.362.502.562.71
2020–242.232.462.522.65
Change−0.13−0.02−0.01−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

Households in New Irving Park are small: just 2.23 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Household size has dropped from 2.36 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in New Irving Park

Median age, years
PeriodNew Irving ParkGreensboro areaNorth CarolinaU.S.
2006–1041.037.637.937.7
2010–1443.638.838.938.6
2015–1946.139.940.239.6
2020–2445.439.740.340.1
Change+4.5+2.1+2.3+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

New Irving Park skews older: half of its residents are older than 45.4, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families. No other Greensboro neighborhood is older.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in New Irving Park

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodNew Irving ParkGreensboro areaNorth CarolinaU.S.
2006–109.7%13.1%12.3%12.3%
2010–1410.1%13.7%12.5%12.3%
2015–196.0%13.0%11.6%11.6%
2020–249.3%12.4%11.4%11.6%
Change−0.4 pts−0.7 pts−1.0 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single-parent households are less common in New Irving Park than nationally: 9.3%, against 11.6%. New Irving Park has a lower share of single-parent households than most Greensboro neighborhoods.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in New Irving Park

Renters in New Irving Park

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodNew Irving ParkGreensboro areaNorth CarolinaU.S.
2006–1035.8%33.8%31.9%33.3%
2010–1438.0%36.0%34.2%35.6%
2015–1928.9%37.4%34.8%36.0%
2020–2427.0%36.2%33.4%34.8%
Change−8.9 pts+2.4 pts+1.4 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Most households in New Irving Park own their homes; 27.0% rent, below the national share of 34.8%. More than a third of owners (36.8%) have paid off their mortgages, below the national share of 39.8%. Rentals cluster in the northeast; owners are most common in the northwest. New Irving Park has the lowest share of renters of any Greensboro neighborhood.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in New Irving Park

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodNew Irving ParkGreensboro areaNorth CarolinaU.S.
2006–107.5%11.5%12.8%11.4%
2010–147.9%11.2%12.8%11.4%
2015–1915.0%11.8%12.5%11.1%
2020–243.8%10.2%11.4%9.6%
Change−3.7 pts−1.3 pts−1.5 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Empty homes are scarce in New Irving Park: just 3.8% sit vacant, compared with 9.6% nationally, a sign of a tight housing market. No other Greensboro neighborhood has a lower vacancy rate.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in New Irving Park

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodNew Irving ParkGreensboro areaNorth CarolinaU.S.
2006–101981198019831974
2010–141982198019851975
2015–191981198219861977
2020–241979198319901980
Change−2+3+7+6
Show on the map ↑︎

The typical home in New Irving Park was built around 1979, about the same vintage as the country's housing overall (1980). Homes here are older than in the Greensboro area as a whole, where the median home dates to 1983. Newer construction is concentrated in the east, while the south has the oldest housing.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in New Irving Park

Rent, per month
PeriodNew Irving ParkGreensboro areaNorth CarolinaU.S.
2006–10$729$740$789$965
2010–14$978$804$868$1,040
2015–19$834$888$981$1,213
2020–24$1,211$1,154$1,317$1,571
Change+$482+$414+$528+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

A typical rental in New Irving Park costs $1,211 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rent takes 40.6% of the typical renter's income, well over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, so many renters here are stretched. Renters on a budget will find the lowest rents in the center; the highest are in the south. Among Greensboro's 11 neighborhoods, though, only two have higher rents.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in New Irving Park

Bachelor's degrees in New Irving Park

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodNew Irving ParkGreensboro areaNorth CarolinaU.S.
2006–1055.3%26.1%27.8%28.4%
2010–1459.0%27.2%29.0%29.6%
2015–1957.3%29.3%32.0%32.1%
2020–2461.2%32.6%36.2%35.6%
Change+6.0 pts+6.5 pts+8.4 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

College graduates are unusually common in New Irving Park: 61.2% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's degree or higher, against 35.6% nationally. Education tends to track local incomes and the kinds of jobs nearby. Only one other Greensboro neighborhood has a higher share of college graduates.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in New Irving Park

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodNew Irving ParkGreensboro areaNorth CarolinaU.S.
2006–1092.4%83.3%84.5%84.9%
2010–1495.3%85.3%86.0%86.1%
2015–1995.8%86.8%88.1%87.7%
2020–2493.5%89.0%90.2%89.3%
Change+1.0 pts+5.7 pts+5.7 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

High school completion in New Irving Park is above the national rate: 93.5% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in New Irving Park

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodNew Irving ParkGreensboro areaNorth CarolinaU.S.
2006–104.0%9.2%8.8%8.1%
2010–145.6%10.8%10.6%9.4%
2015–190.8%5.7%5.7%5.6%
2020–241.4%4.6%4.8%5.4%
Change−2.6 pts−4.5 pts−4.0 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

The job market in New Irving Park has been strong: just 1.4% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. No other Greensboro neighborhood has lower unemployment. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

New Irving Park compared with nearby neighborhoods

NeighborhoodHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
New Irving Park2.2345.49.3%27.0%3.8%1979$1,21161.2%93.5%1.4%
O Henry Oaks2.8834.621.6%72.0%5.7%1967$1,0688.3%74.4%7.3%
Cumberland2.0919.518.5%82.8%28.2%1964$81828.8%81.6%20.1%
College Hill1.9422.62.0%71.5%19.5%1963$1,04163.0%98.9%7.0%
Brice Street Area2.2722.66.1%78.6%13.9%1964$1,10658.0%94.0%4.9%
Lindley Park2.1731.28.1%50.2%9.2%1970$1,07453.4%98.1%2.9%
Starmount Forest2.5836.110.5%42.4%3.9%1973$1,18747.1%94.9%2.9%
Smith Homes2.6730.833.0%75.2%17.3%1963$76612.2%77.1%24.3%
Hewitt Area2.1826.112.9%88.2%10.6%1980$88422.2%84.8%3.7%
Rolling Roads2.9133.317.1%58.4%10.7%1986$1,40922.2%70.8%6.2%
Adams Farm2.3535.813.3%57.5%8.0%1993$1,73461.2%99.5%1.6%

All figures 2020–24.

Neighborhoods with similar populations: Monte Vista, San Antonio, TX · University, Buffalo, NY · Turners, Dundalk, MD · Tri-South, Columbus, OH · Tosa East Towne, Wauwatosa, WI · Torringford, Torrington, CT · Tobin Hill, San Antonio, TX · North Country Meadows, Oildale, CA · Muncie-Stony PT., Kansas City, KS · Urbanizacion Levittown Lakes, Toa Baja, PR

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up New Irving Park. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.