Population 3,835 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Rolling Roads: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Rolling Roads
Household size in Rolling Roads
| Period | Rolling Roads | Greensboro area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.75 | 2.48 | 2.53 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.64 | 2.50 | 2.58 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.60 | 2.50 | 2.56 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.91 | 2.46 | 2.52 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.16 | −0.02 | −0.01 | −0.03 |
Households in Rolling Roads are large by national standards, averaging 2.91 people against 2.65 for the U.S. That usually means more families with children at home. Household size has climbed from 2.75 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next. No other Greensboro neighborhood has larger households.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Rolling Roads
| Period | Rolling Roads | Greensboro area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 35.9 | 37.6 | 37.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 32.9 | 38.8 | 38.9 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 31.9 | 39.9 | 40.2 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 33.3 | 39.7 | 40.3 | 40.1 |
| Change | −2.6 | +2.1 | +2.3 | +2.3 |
With a median age of just 33.3, Rolling Roads is far younger than the country as a whole (40.1), a population that tilts toward young families with children.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Rolling Roads
| Period | Rolling Roads | Greensboro area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.3% | 13.1% | 12.3% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 22.6% | 13.7% | 12.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 19.8% | 13.0% | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 17.1% | 12.4% | 11.4% | 11.6% |
| Change | −3.2 pts | −0.7 pts | −1.0 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are common in Rolling Roads: 17.1% of all households, against 11.6% nationally. Rolling Roads has a higher share of single-parent households than most Greensboro neighborhoods.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Rolling Roads
Renters in Rolling Roads
| Period | Rolling Roads | Greensboro area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 32.6% | 33.8% | 31.9% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 42.6% | 36.0% | 34.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 51.0% | 37.4% | 34.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 58.4% | 36.2% | 33.4% | 34.8% |
| Change | +25.8 pts | +2.4 pts | +1.4 pts | +1.5 pts |
Renters far outnumber owners in Rolling Roads: 58.4% of households rent their homes, against 34.8% nationally. Just over four in ten owners (41.7%) have paid off their mortgages, about the same as nationally.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Rolling Roads
| Period | Rolling Roads | Greensboro area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 15.9% | 11.5% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 15.1% | 11.2% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 8.2% | 11.8% | 12.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 10.7% | 10.2% | 11.4% | 9.6% |
| Change | −5.2 pts | −1.3 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
About as many homes sit empty in Rolling Roads as nationally: 10.7%, against 9.6%.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Rolling Roads
| Period | Rolling Roads | Greensboro area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1973 | 1980 | 1983 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1973 | 1980 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1981 | 1982 | 1986 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1986 | 1983 | 1990 | 1980 |
| Change | +13 | +3 | +7 | +6 |
Homes in Rolling Roads are newer than the national norm: the median home was built in 1986, versus 1980 across the U.S. The picture is much the same across the Greensboro area. Only one other Greensboro neighborhood has newer homes.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Rolling Roads
| Period | Rolling Roads | Greensboro area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $793 | $740 | $789 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $719 | $804 | $868 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $927 | $888 | $981 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,409 | $1,154 | $1,317 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$616 | +$414 | +$528 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Rolling Roads costs $1,409 a month with utilities, below the national median of $1,571. Locally, though, rents here are higher than in the Greensboro area overall ($1,154). Rent takes 32.2% of the typical renter's income, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent. Only one other Greensboro neighborhood has higher rents.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Rolling Roads
Bachelor's degrees in Rolling Roads
| Period | Rolling Roads | Greensboro area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.3% | 26.1% | 27.8% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 26.2% | 27.2% | 29.0% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 15.7% | 29.3% | 32.0% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 22.2% | 32.6% | 36.2% | 35.6% |
| Change | +1.9 pts | +6.5 pts | +8.4 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Rolling Roads have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 22.2%, against 35.6% nationally. Only two of Greensboro's 11 neighborhoods have a lower share of college graduates.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Rolling Roads
| Period | Rolling Roads | Greensboro area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 81.3% | 83.3% | 84.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 80.2% | 85.3% | 86.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 86.1% | 86.8% | 88.1% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 70.8% | 89.0% | 90.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | −10.5 pts | +5.7 pts | +5.7 pts | +4.3 pts |
About three in ten adults in Rolling Roads never finished high school, well above the national share: only 70.8% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally. No other Greensboro neighborhood has a lower share of high school graduates.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Rolling Roads
| Period | Rolling Roads | Greensboro area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.9% | 9.2% | 8.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 13.1% | 10.8% | 10.6% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 7.2% | 5.7% | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 6.2% | 4.6% | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| Change | −5.7 pts | −4.5 pts | −4.0 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment runs a little high in Rolling Roads: 6.2% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4% nationally. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Rolling Roads compared with nearby neighborhoods
| Neighborhood | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Roads | 2.91 | 33.3 | 17.1% | 58.4% | 10.7% | 1986 | $1,409 | 22.2% | 70.8% | 6.2% |
| Smith Homes | 2.67 | 30.8 | 33.0% | 75.2% | 17.3% | 1963 | $766 | 12.2% | 77.1% | 24.3% |
| Lindley Park | 2.17 | 31.2 | 8.1% | 50.2% | 9.2% | 1970 | $1,074 | 53.4% | 98.1% | 2.9% |
| Brice Street Area | 2.27 | 22.6 | 6.1% | 78.6% | 13.9% | 1964 | $1,106 | 58.0% | 94.0% | 4.9% |
| Hewitt Area | 2.18 | 26.1 | 12.9% | 88.2% | 10.6% | 1980 | $884 | 22.2% | 84.8% | 3.7% |
| College Hill | 1.94 | 22.6 | 2.0% | 71.5% | 19.5% | 1963 | $1,041 | 63.0% | 98.9% | 7.0% |
| Starmount Forest | 2.58 | 36.1 | 10.5% | 42.4% | 3.9% | 1973 | $1,187 | 47.1% | 94.9% | 2.9% |
| Cumberland | 2.09 | 19.5 | 18.5% | 82.8% | 28.2% | 1964 | $818 | 28.8% | 81.6% | 20.1% |
| Adams Farm | 2.35 | 35.8 | 13.3% | 57.5% | 8.0% | 1993 | $1,734 | 61.2% | 99.5% | 1.6% |
| New Irving Park | 2.23 | 45.4 | 9.3% | 27.0% | 3.8% | 1979 | $1,211 | 61.2% | 93.5% | 1.4% |
| O Henry Oaks | 2.88 | 34.6 | 21.6% | 72.0% | 5.7% | 1967 | $1,068 | 8.3% | 74.4% | 7.3% |
All figures 2020–24.
Neighborhoods with similar populations: Millview East, San Marcos, TX · Old Town Florissant, Florissant, MO · Park, Redford, MI · Franklin Falls, Franklin, NH · Prairie Point-Wildberry, Kansas City, MO · Holly Hills, St. Louis, MO · Highlands, Wilmington, DE · Granite Hills, El Cajon, CA · Fairwood and Robandee, Kansas City, MO · East Augusta, Augusta, GA
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Rolling Roads. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.