Population 332 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Newby: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Newby
Household size in Newby
| Period | Newby | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.64 | 2.56 | 2.55 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.93 | 2.60 | 2.60 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 3.09 | 2.60 | 2.63 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.79 | 2.59 | 2.58 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.15 | +0.03 | +0.03 | −0.03 |
The typical household in Newby holds 2.79 people, slightly more than the U.S. average of 2.65. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.64, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Newby
| Period | Newby | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 34.1 | 37.2 | 37.4 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 40.2 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 38.4 | 37.8 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 42.2 | 38.0 | 38.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +8.1 | +0.8 | +0.6 | +2.3 |
Newby skews a little older than the country: its median age is 42.2, against 40.1 nationally.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Newby
| Period | Newby | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 5.8% | 11.7% | 11.9% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 4.9% | 12.5% | 12.1% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 11.8% | 12.2% | 12.1% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 4.2% | 11.6% | 12.0% | 11.6% |
| Change | −1.6 pts | −0.1 pts | +0.1 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Newby: 4.2% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Newby
Renters in Newby
| Period | Newby | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 18.2% | 32.5% | 31.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 9.5% | 33.8% | 33.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 7.1% | 35.2% | 34.4% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 18.9% | 34.5% | 34.2% | 34.8% |
| Change | +0.6 pts | +2.1 pts | +2.4 pts | +1.5 pts |
Newby is largely a place of homeowners: only 18.9% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. About six in ten owners (61.4%) have paid off their mortgages, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Newby
| Period | Newby | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 17.2% | 10.1% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 10.8% | 10.3% | 12.7% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 21.7% | 10.6% | 13.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 12.0% | 8.5% | 11.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −5.3 pts | −1.7 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy runs a little high in Newby: 12.0% of homes are empty, against 9.6% nationally. The count includes vacation homes and homes between owners or tenants, not just abandoned ones.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Newby
| Period | Newby | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1980 | 1978 | 1976 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1984 | 1979 | 1977 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1992 | 1980 | 1979 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1998 | 1983 | 1982 | 1980 |
| Change | +18 | +6 | +7 | +6 |
Much of the housing in Newby is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 1998, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Newby
| Period | Newby | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $463 | $794 | $716 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $675 | $872 | $805 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,078 | $979 | $897 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,165 | $1,219 | $1,127 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$702 | +$425 | +$411 | +$606 |
Rent in Newby runs $1,165 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. That is in line with the rest of the Tulsa area. The typical renter here spends 14.8% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Newby
Bachelor's degrees in Newby
| Period | Newby | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.3% | 25.5% | 24.2% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 9.3% | 26.2% | 24.9% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 11.8% | 27.7% | 26.1% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 16.6% | 30.3% | 28.9% | 35.6% |
| Change | +4.4 pts | +4.8 pts | +4.7 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Newby: 16.6% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Newby
| Period | Newby | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 86.1% | 87.7% | 86.0% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 82.3% | 88.4% | 87.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 86.6% | 89.3% | 88.1% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 90.5% | 90.1% | 89.3% | 89.3% |
| Change | +4.5 pts | +2.4 pts | +3.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
About as many adults in Newby have finished high school as nationally: 90.5%, against 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Newby
| Period | Newby | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 7.1% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 12.4% | 7.1% | 6.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 4.0% | 5.5% | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.4% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Change | −4.8 pts | −0.9 pts | −1.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Newby has been low: just 2.4% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Newby compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Newby | 2.79 | 42.2 | 4.2% | 18.9% | 12.0% | 1998 | $1,165 | 16.6% | 90.5% | 2.4% |
| Iron Post | 2.59 | 43.6 | 8.3% | 16.2% | 10.4% | 1995 | $939 | 17.1% | 89.4% | 2.7% |
| Tuskegee | 2.78 | 42.1 | 4.2% | 18.7% | 12.0% | 1997 | $1,128 | 16.6% | 90.5% | 2.7% |
| Welty | 2.67 | 41.6 | 7.2% | 16.2% | 12.5% | 1988 | $751 | 18.3% | 90.9% | 6.4% |
| Bristow | 2.53 | 37.0 | 13.4% | 39.8% | 12.2% | 1981 | $744 | 13.6% | 91.4% | 4.1% |
| Edna | 3.05 | 38.5 | 7.4% | 13.1% | 8.5% | 1993 | $974 | 19.9% | 94.0% | 6.1% |
| DePew | 2.37 | 42.2 | 11.2% | 22.2% | 13.2% | 1990 | $867 | 15.2% | 91.1% | 3.3% |
| Slick | 2.98 | 43.6 | 3.6% | 10.2% | 10.2% | 1994 | $942 | 17.5% | 91.8% | 4.4% |
| Micawber | 2.92 | 37.6 | 8.9% | 14.3% | 16.7% | 1987 | $781 | 17.2% | 85.7% | 6.5% |
| Milfay | 2.55 | 42.6 | 11.4% | 15.3% | 11.7% | 1992 | $945 | 20.4% | 92.8% | 5.2% |
| Nuyaka | 2.59 | 35.9 | 4.9% | 13.9% | 12.6% | 1989 | $810 | 19.2% | 96.5% | 2.1% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Dike, TX · Cliff, NM · Clinchport, VA · Coalville, NC · Coburg, KY · Colony, OK · Crescent, LA · Cropsey, IL · Cruppers Corner, KS · Curryville, PA
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Newby. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.