Population 87 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Omo Ranch: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Omo Ranch
Household size in Omo Ranch
| Period | Omo Ranch | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.51 | 2.76 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.49 | 2.81 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.30 | 2.82 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.46 | 2.83 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.06 | +0.07 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
The average household in Omo Ranch has 2.46 people, under the U.S. average of 2.65.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Omo Ranch
| Period | Omo Ranch | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 44.1 | 36.7 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 44.6 | 37.6 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 58.3 | 38.7 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 45.8 | 39.6 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +1.7 | +2.9 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Omo Ranch skews older: half of its residents are older than 45.8, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families. Since 2006–10, the median age has climbed from 44.1, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Omo Ranch
| Period | Omo Ranch | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.0% | 12.8% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 3.6% | 12.9% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 13.0% | 11.5% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.7% | 11.0% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | −2.3 pts | −1.7 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Omo Ranch: 3.7% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Omo Ranch
Renters in Omo Ranch
| Period | Omo Ranch | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.5% | 37.3% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 12.1% | 40.4% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 10.9% | 39.7% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 8.2% | 37.0% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +1.7 pts | −0.3 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Omo Ranch is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 8.2% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. Among homeowners, 15.4% have no mortgage at all, well below the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Omo Ranch
| Period | Omo Ranch | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 26.0% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 33.0% | 8.7% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 21.4% | 6.7% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 20.6% | 6.7% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −5.3 pts | −2.6 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Omo Ranch: 20.6% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Omo Ranch
| Period | Omo Ranch | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1985 | 1980 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1987 | 1981 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1987 | 1982 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1988 | 1985 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +2 | +5 | +4 | +6 |
Omo Ranch has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1988, versus 1980 nationally. That is in line with the rest of the Sacramento area.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Omo Ranch
| Period | Omo Ranch | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $1,155 | $1,199 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $1,065 | $1,254 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $1,426 | $1,488 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,672 | $2,018 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$517 | +$818 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in Omo Ranch runs $1,672 a month at the median, utilities included, above the U.S. median of $1,571. Even so, rents here are lower than in the wider Sacramento area ($2,018). Rent takes 30.8% of the typical renter's income, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Omo Ranch
Bachelor's degrees in Omo Ranch
| Period | Omo Ranch | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 18.8% | 30.1% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 23.9% | 30.6% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 23.6% | 33.6% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 31.5% | 37.4% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +12.7 pts | +7.2 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
Just over three in ten adults 25 and older in Omo Ranch (31.5%) have a bachelor's degree or higher, a little below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Omo Ranch
| Period | Omo Ranch | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 93.6% | 86.8% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 88.3% | 87.6% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 95.1% | 89.0% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 98.2% | 89.9% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +4.6 pts | +3.1 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
Finishing high school is nearly universal in Omo Ranch: 98.2% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Omo Ranch
| Period | Omo Ranch | Sacramento area | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.4% | 9.7% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 17.3% | 12.4% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 20.0% | 6.1% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.6% | 6.2% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −7.8 pts | −3.5 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
The job market in Omo Ranch has been strong: just 2.6% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Omo Ranch compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omo Ranch | 2.46 | 45.8 | 3.7% | 8.2% | 20.6% | 1988 | $1,672 | 31.5% | 98.2% | 2.6% |
| Grizzly Flats | 2.66 | 45.4 | 6.6% | 9.5% | 25.4% | 1993 | $1,476 | 28.1% | 96.5% | 0.2% |
| Somerset | 2.42 | 46.5 | 4.6% | 18.1% | 11.7% | 1985 | $1,843 | 26.8% | 95.2% | 7.0% |
| Mount Aukum | 2.26 | 58.4 | 3.3% | 5.1% | 31.2% | 1981 | $1,601 | 47.3% | 94.3% | 2.2% |
| Kit Carson | 2.29 | 53.1 | 9.2% | 9.2% | 35.0% | 1985 | $1,684 | 22.7% | 91.0% | 4.5% |
| Volcano | 2.22 | 56.3 | 8.3% | 7.7% | 20.0% | 1988 | $1,395 | 29.6% | 93.2% | 2.6% |
| Pioneer | 2.35 | 51.5 | 9.8% | 12.3% | 28.5% | 1983 | $1,478 | 23.3% | 95.2% | 2.7% |
| River Pines | 2.94 | 39.8 | 6.9% | 8.4% | 23.6% | 1964 | $1,426 | 42.6% | 91.6% | 2.0% |
| Fiddletown | 2.26 | 55.4 | 13.2% | 5.1% | 19.7% | 1984 | $1,549 | 30.4% | 92.6% | 1.6% |
| White Hall | 2.32 | 47.1 | 5.6% | 8.1% | 50.9% | 1978 | $1,413 | 40.1% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
| Pollock Pines | 2.37 | 44.8 | 13.0% | 18.0% | 15.9% | 1981 | $2,164 | 22.8% | 92.6% | 6.2% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Belsena Mills, PA · Wolf Springs, AL · Withrow, WA · Wightman, VA · Bucu, VA · Brooklyn, WA · Brevort, MI · Blaine, IN · Birmingham, PA · Wolf, WY
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Omo Ranch. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.