Population 610 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Osmond: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Osmond
Household size in Osmond
| Period | Osmond | Chapel Hill area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.71 | 2.40 | 2.53 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.60 | 2.44 | 2.58 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.61 | 2.43 | 2.56 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.28 | 2.40 | 2.52 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.43 | +0.00 | −0.01 | −0.03 |
Households in Osmond are small: just 2.28 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.71, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Osmond
| Period | Osmond | Chapel Hill area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 40.8 | 36.9 | 37.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 43.9 | 37.7 | 38.9 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 45.2 | 39.2 | 40.2 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 50.8 | 39.9 | 40.3 | 40.1 |
| Change | +9.9 | +2.9 | +2.3 | +2.3 |
With a median age of 50.8, Osmond is noticeably older than the country as a whole (40.1), an age mix that tilts toward empty nesters and retirees.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Osmond
| Period | Osmond | Chapel Hill area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 13.0% | 12.0% | 12.3% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 10.9% | 12.0% | 12.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 9.2% | 11.0% | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 3.0% | 10.2% | 11.4% | 11.6% |
| Change | −10.0 pts | −1.8 pts | −1.0 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head only 3.0% of households in Osmond, well below the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Osmond
Renters in Osmond
| Period | Osmond | Chapel Hill area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 16.4% | 38.7% | 31.9% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 17.0% | 39.8% | 34.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 13.1% | 39.3% | 34.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 9.9% | 37.8% | 33.4% | 34.8% |
| Change | −6.5 pts | −0.9 pts | +1.4 pts | +1.5 pts |
Osmond is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 9.9% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. More than four in ten owners (42.9%) have paid off their mortgages, above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Osmond
| Period | Osmond | Chapel Hill area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 24.3% | 11.2% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 18.6% | 9.6% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 22.1% | 9.8% | 12.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 12.8% | 9.2% | 11.4% | 9.6% |
| Change | −11.5 pts | −2.0 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy runs high in Osmond: 12.8% of homes are empty, against 9.6% nationally. The count includes vacation homes and homes between owners or tenants, not just abandoned ones.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Osmond
| Period | Osmond | Chapel Hill area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1983 | 1983 | 1983 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1984 | 1984 | 1985 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1985 | 1986 | 1986 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1990 | 1991 | 1990 | 1980 |
| Change | +8 | +8 | +7 | +6 |
Osmond has newer housing than the country as a whole: the median home was built in 1990, versus 1980 nationally. The Chapel Hill area as a whole looks much the same.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Osmond
| Period | Osmond | Chapel Hill area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $480 | $889 | $789 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $577 | $951 | $868 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $782 | $1,102 | $981 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $886 | $1,501 | $1,317 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$406 | +$612 | +$528 | +$606 |
A typical rental in Osmond costs $886 a month with utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rent takes 31.8% of the typical renter's income, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Osmond
Bachelor's degrees in Osmond
| Period | Osmond | Chapel Hill area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 14.8% | 43.7% | 27.8% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 11.3% | 45.7% | 29.0% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 15.5% | 48.5% | 32.0% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 25.6% | 53.9% | 36.2% | 35.6% |
| Change | +10.8 pts | +10.2 pts | +8.4 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Osmond: 25.6% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Osmond
| Period | Osmond | Chapel Hill area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 75.3% | 86.9% | 84.5% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 80.8% | 88.4% | 86.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 85.9% | 89.4% | 88.1% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 86.9% | 91.5% | 90.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +11.6 pts | +4.7 pts | +5.7 pts | +4.3 pts |
About one in eight adults in Osmond never finished high school, a bit more than nationally: 86.9% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% across the U.S.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Osmond
| Period | Osmond | Chapel Hill area | North Carolina | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.4% | 7.8% | 8.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 10.5% | 8.6% | 10.6% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 2.8% | 4.5% | 5.7% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 4.5% | 4.0% | 4.8% | 5.4% |
| Change | −5.9 pts | −3.8 pts | −4.0 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Osmond runs below the national rate: 4.5% of the labor force was out of work and looking, against 5.4% nationally. That is in line with the rest of the Chapel Hill area. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Osmond compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osmond | 2.28 | 50.8 | 3.0% | 9.9% | 12.8% | 1990 | $886 | 25.6% | 86.9% | 4.5% |
| Leasburg | 2.37 | 47.3 | 5.6% | 10.3% | 15.7% | 1986 | $849 | 23.2% | 93.3% | 4.0% |
| Semora | 2.01 | 60.4 | 2.1% | 13.8% | 41.1% | 1985 | $892 | 39.3% | 93.4% | 5.8% |
| Milton | 2.34 | 51.6 | 6.0% | 15.7% | 23.3% | 1990 | $793 | 23.8% | 81.7% | 4.1% |
| McGehees Mill | 1.86 | 62.2 | 0.8% | 13.1% | 47.3% | 1984 | $934 | 41.0% | 96.9% | 6.5% |
| Hamer | 2.47 | 46.3 | 13.7% | 26.4% | 24.2% | 1986 | $759 | 30.3% | 71.5% | 3.3% |
| Pleasant Grove | 2.61 | 41.8 | 22.4% | 31.7% | 25.1% | 1992 | $718 | 31.5% | 61.5% | 3.1% |
| Topnot | 2.29 | 49.6 | 11.4% | 19.8% | 27.5% | 1996 | $745 | 26.6% | 76.2% | 2.7% |
| Brooksdale | 2.28 | 44.4 | 14.6% | 21.8% | 5.7% | 1987 | $802 | 12.5% | 95.9% | 6.0% |
| Blanch | 2.22 | 46.3 | 3.4% | 38.7% | 27.3% | 1980 | $814 | 23.5% | 81.5% | 5.6% |
| Roxboro | 2.48 | 43.8 | 13.2% | 27.9% | 12.1% | 1977 | $1,026 | 16.5% | 85.7% | 6.8% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: South Branch, MI · Greenbush, ME · Groom, TX · Hallwood, GA · Heinola, MN · Henderson, NY · Hinckley, ME · Humble City, NM · Ipava, IL · Smithfield, IL
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Osmond. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.