Population 91 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Pan Tak: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Pan Tak
Household size in Pan Tak
| Period | Pan Tak | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.98 | 2.57 | 2.77 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 3.41 | 2.61 | 2.84 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 3.23 | 2.56 | 2.82 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 3.09 | 2.48 | 2.70 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.11 | −0.09 | −0.07 | −0.03 |
Pan Tak is a place of big households: 3.09 people per home on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. Numbers like that usually point to plenty of families with kids. Since 2006–10, household size has climbed from 2.98, but in a place this small, survey estimates can swing a lot from one release to the next.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Pan Tak
| Period | Pan Tak | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 40.7 | 38.9 | 36.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 32.6 | 39.5 | 38.1 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 41.3 | 40.5 | 39.5 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 35.0 | 41.7 | 40.4 | 40.1 |
| Change | −5.7 | +2.7 | +3.5 | +2.3 |
Pan Tak is young: half of its residents are under 35.0, compared with a national median of 40.1. The population tilts toward young families with children.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Pan Tak
| Period | Pan Tak | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 23.3% | 12.2% | 13.4% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 21.8% | 12.7% | 13.6% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 21.5% | 12.3% | 12.7% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 29.1% | 11.3% | 12.6% | 11.6% |
| Change | +5.9 pts | −0.9 pts | −0.8 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head about three in ten households in Pan Tak (29.1%), well above the national share of 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Pan Tak
Renters in Pan Tak
| Period | Pan Tak | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 26.5% | 35.4% | 32.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 21.6% | 38.5% | 36.6% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 32.1% | 37.0% | 35.6% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 48.0% | 34.8% | 32.6% | 34.8% |
| Change | +21.5 pts | −0.7 pts | +0.1 pts | +1.5 pts |
Renting is far more common in Pan Tak than nationally: 48.0% of households rent their homes, against 34.8%. Among homeowners, 90.9% have no mortgage at all, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Pan Tak
| Period | Pan Tak | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 24.8% | 12.4% | 15.2% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 31.2% | 13.0% | 15.3% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 28.2% | 11.5% | 12.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 34.6% | 9.1% | 9.6% | 9.6% |
| Change | +9.8 pts | −3.2 pts | −5.6 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Pan Tak: 34.6% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Pan Tak
| Period | Pan Tak | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1979 | 1983 | 1987 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1980 | 1984 | 1988 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1985 | 1984 | 1989 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1978 | 1987 | 1992 | 1980 |
| Change | −2 | +4 | +5 | +6 |
Homes in Pan Tak are about the same age as the nation's housing: the median home was built in 1978, versus 1980 nationally. Homes here are older than in the Tucson area as a whole, where the median home dates to 1987.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Pan Tak
| Period | Pan Tak | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $616 | $960 | $1,043 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $539 | $991 | $1,078 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $629 | $1,089 | $1,227 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $559 | $1,479 | $1,736 | $1,571 |
| Change | −$57 | +$519 | +$694 | +$606 |
Rent in Pan Tak runs $559 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. Rent takes 28.5% of the typical renter's income, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Pan Tak
Bachelor's degrees in Pan Tak
| Period | Pan Tak | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.1% | 29.4% | 26.3% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 12.9% | 29.4% | 27.0% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 13.2% | 32.0% | 29.3% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 13.6% | 36.4% | 33.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +7.5 pts | +7.0 pts | +7.0 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Pan Tak: 13.6% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Pan Tak
| Period | Pan Tak | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 74.5% | 86.7% | 84.6% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 77.6% | 86.9% | 85.5% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 83.9% | 87.9% | 86.8% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 88.6% | 90.3% | 89.1% | 89.3% |
| Change | +14.2 pts | +3.6 pts | +4.5 pts | +4.3 pts |
About as many adults in Pan Tak have finished high school as nationally: 88.6%, against 89.3%. The rate is lower than in the Tucson area as a whole (90.3%).
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Pan Tak
| Period | Pan Tak | Tucson area | Arizona | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 25.4% | 8.0% | 7.8% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 19.1% | 10.8% | 10.2% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 7.2% | 7.0% | 6.0% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 5.0% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Change | −20.4 pts | −2.7 pts | −2.5 pts | −2.7 pts |
Unemployment in Pan Tak is close to the national rate: 5.0% of the labor force, against 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Pan Tak compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pan Tak | 3.09 | 35.0 | 29.1% | 48.0% | 34.6% | 1978 | $559 | 13.6% | 88.6% | 5.0% |
| Haivana Nakya | 3.50 | 25.8 | 33.1% | 57.3% | 34.2% | 1976 | $410 | 4.4% | 86.3% | 6.4% |
| Schuchk | 3.50 | 25.8 | 33.1% | 57.3% | 34.2% | 1976 | $410 | 4.4% | 86.3% | 6.4% |
| Three Points | 2.78 | 41.9 | 10.7% | 10.6% | 16.1% | 1990 | $1,094 | 10.8% | 72.5% | 3.9% |
| Comobabi | 3.50 | 25.8 | 33.1% | 57.3% | 34.2% | 1976 | $410 | 4.4% | 86.3% | 6.4% |
| Chiawuli Tak | 3.50 | 25.8 | 33.1% | 57.3% | 34.2% | 1976 | $410 | 4.4% | 86.3% | 6.4% |
| Ko Vaya | 3.52 | 31.8 | 28.8% | 29.4% | 31.5% | 1979 | $708 | 2.7% | 79.2% | 9.9% |
| Sells | 3.53 | 30.1 | 35.3% | 30.8% | 20.6% | 1982 | $475 | 6.6% | 76.0% | 17.8% |
| Valencia West | 3.12 | 35.4 | 12.7% | 15.6% | 5.6% | 2003 | $1,566 | 17.7% | 85.4% | 3.8% |
| Tucson Estates | 2.35 | 52.5 | 8.2% | 9.6% | 12.6% | 1992 | $1,347 | 24.1% | 87.1% | 3.1% |
| Drexel Heights | 3.00 | 39.6 | 18.4% | 15.2% | 5.2% | 1989 | $1,261 | 17.7% | 85.3% | 5.2% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Nortonville, ND · Newhall, WV · Newhouse, MN · Newkirk, IA · Newman, KS · Nimmons, SC · Nimrod, AR · Niter, ID · Noble, KY · Nook, PA
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Pan Tak. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.