Population 31 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Pequaming: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Pequaming
Household size in Pequaming
| Period | Pequaming | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.41 | 2.58 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.22 | 2.58 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.45 | 2.53 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.26 | 2.51 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.15 | −0.06 | −0.03 |
Households in Pequaming are small: just 2.26 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Since 2006–10, household size has dropped from 2.41, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Pequaming
| Period | Pequaming | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 45.0 | 38.9 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 48.3 | 40.1 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 50.4 | 41.0 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 47.1 | 41.3 | 40.1 |
| Change | +2.1 | +2.4 | +2.3 |
Pequaming skews older: half of its residents are older than 47.1, well above the national median of 40.1. That usually means more empty nesters and retirees, and fewer young families.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Pequaming
| Period | Pequaming | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 15.3% | 11.3% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 9.4% | 11.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 7.6% | 10.9% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 7.3% | 10.7% | 11.6% |
| Change | −8.0 pts | −0.6 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are relatively rare in Pequaming: 7.3% of households, against 11.6% nationally.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Pequaming
Renters in Pequaming
| Period | Pequaming | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 23.3% | 25.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 15.2% | 28.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 12.7% | 28.8% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 14.2% | 26.8% | 34.8% |
| Change | −9.1 pts | +1.0 pts | +1.5 pts |
Pequaming is overwhelmingly a place of homeowners: only 14.2% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. About two-thirds of owners (66.7%) have paid off their mortgages, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Pequaming
| Period | Pequaming | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 41.4% | 13.0% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 42.6% | 13.0% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 38.9% | 11.9% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 32.0% | 10.2% | 9.6% |
| Change | −9.4 pts | −2.8 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy is high in Pequaming: 32.0% of homes are empty, far above the national rate of 9.6%. In resort and lake areas that usually means seasonal and vacation homes; elsewhere it can point to weak demand.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Pequaming
| Period | Pequaming | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1972 | 1969 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1972 | 1970 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1977 | 1971 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1975 | 1972 | 1980 |
| Change | +3 | +3 | +6 |
Homes in Pequaming run a bit older than the national norm, with a median build year of 1975 against 1980. That is in line with the rest of Michigan.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Pequaming
| Period | Pequaming | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $565 | $833 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $613 | $886 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $568 | $978 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $714 | $1,228 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$149 | +$395 | +$606 |
Rent in Pequaming runs $714 a month at the median, utilities included, well below the U.S. median of $1,571. The typical renter here spends 14.2% of household income on rent, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Pequaming
Bachelor's degrees in Pequaming
| Period | Pequaming | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 12.5% | 26.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 23.2% | 27.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 22.8% | 29.5% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 21.0% | 32.7% | 35.6% |
| Change | +8.6 pts | +6.6 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Pequaming: 21.0% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Pequaming
| Period | Pequaming | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 91.2% | 88.3% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 90.0% | 89.3% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 95.2% | 90.7% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 91.7% | 91.8% | 89.3% |
| Change | +0.4 pts | +3.5 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Pequaming is a bit above the national rate: 91.7% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%. Michigan as a whole looks much the same.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Pequaming
| Period | Pequaming | Michigan | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 10.4% | 11.5% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 8.5% | 11.7% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 6.1% | 6.1% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 2.4% | 5.9% | 5.4% |
| Change | −8.0 pts | −5.7 pts | −2.7 pts |
The job market in Pequaming has been strong: just 2.4% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well below the national rate of 5.4%. Because the Census pools five years of responses (2020–24), these rates smooth over short swings and lag the current job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Pequaming compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pequaming | 2.26 | 47.1 | 7.3% | 14.2% | 32.0% | 1975 | $714 | 21.0% | 91.7% | 2.4% |
| Zeba | 2.24 | 47.2 | 6.6% | 15.6% | 29.5% | 1973 | $726 | 20.9% | 92.1% | 2.6% |
| Aura | 2.14 | 52.4 | 4.8% | 13.5% | 42.9% | 1976 | $708 | 20.6% | 94.5% | 2.0% |
| L'Anse | 2.12 | 49.7 | 4.8% | 21.8% | 20.4% | 1970 | $679 | 17.7% | 92.9% | 7.1% |
| Keweenaw Bay | 2.10 | 58.4 | 6.4% | 21.0% | 39.8% | 1959 | $635 | 15.9% | 82.3% | 15.7% |
| Baraga | 2.08 | 39.3 | 12.3% | 31.5% | 19.2% | 1973 | $537 | 9.1% | 90.2% | 3.0% |
| Skanee | 1.99 | 58.8 | 1.8% | 12.5% | 55.9% | 1978 | $701 | 20.1% | 98.0% | 1.4% |
| Klingville | 2.05 | 52.2 | 4.4% | 20.4% | 29.4% | 1962 | $900 | 30.3% | 93.7% | 7.9% |
| Portage Entry | 2.06 | 53.5 | 3.1% | 15.0% | 36.1% | 1967 | $1,073 | 35.1% | 97.8% | 2.9% |
| Herman | 1.96 | 60.0 | 1.3% | 12.3% | 58.4% | 1978 | $700 | 20.0% | 98.6% | 1.3% |
| Jacobsville | 2.11 | 61.5 | 2.5% | 5.5% | 58.9% | 1976 | $1,178 | 31.5% | 95.6% | 0.0% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Shawkemo, MA · Manchester, WA · Maple Leaf, SD · Marion Forks, OR · Schattel, TX · Seneca, NM · Sequoia National Park, CA · Shannon, OH · Sharples, WV · Mahoning, PA
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Pequaming. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.