Population 5,799 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
More maps of Pixley: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Pixley
Household size in Pixley
| Period | Pixley | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.90 | 3.04 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 4.37 | 3.10 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 3.51 | 3.09 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 4.21 | 3.01 | 2.65 |
| Change | +0.31 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
Pixley is a place of big households: 4.21 people per home on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. Numbers like that usually point to plenty of families with kids. Household size has climbed from 3.90 in 2006–10, even as the national average fell. Of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people, only 11 have larger households.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Pixley
| Period | Pixley | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 23.8 | 35.8 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 20.4 | 36.8 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 29.7 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 23.5 | 39.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | −0.3 | +3.1 | +2.3 |
Pixley is young: half of its residents are under 23.5, compared with a national median of 40.1. The population tilts toward families with many children. Only two of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people are younger.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Pixley
| Period | Pixley | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 20.4% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 18.8% | 13.5% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 16.3% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 25.7% | 12.3% | 11.6% |
| Change | +5.3 pts | −1.2 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single parents head about a quarter of households in Pixley (25.7%), well above the national share of 11.6%. The single-parent share has risen 5.3 points since 2006–10, even as the national share fell. Of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people, only 17 have a higher share of single-parent households.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Pixley
Renters in Pixley
| Period | Pixley | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 53.1% | 42.6% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 64.0% | 45.2% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 59.5% | 45.2% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 55.5% | 44.1% | 34.8% |
| Change | +2.4 pts | +1.5 pts | +1.5 pts |
Renters far outnumber owners in Pixley: 55.5% of households rent their homes, against 34.8% nationally. Among owners, 48.7% have paid off their mortgages, above the national share of 39.8%. Since 2006–10, the renter share has risen 2.4 points, mirroring the country. Only 68 of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people have a higher share of renters.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Pixley
| Period | Pixley | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 11.9% | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 8.4% | 8.1% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 7.6% | 7.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 9.6% | 7.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −2.3 pts | −1.4 pts | −1.8 pts |
Vacancy in Pixley is the same as the national rate: 9.6% of homes are empty. The rate is higher than in California overall (7.3%). Vacancy has fallen 2.3 points since 2006–10, mirroring the country.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Pixley
| Period | Pixley | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1971 | 1972 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1976 | 1973 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1979 | 1974 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1977 | 1976 | 1980 |
| Change | +7 | +4 | +6 |
Homes in Pixley are about the same age as the nation's housing: the median home was built in 1977, versus 1980 nationally. The median year built has moved up from 1971 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Pixley
| Period | Pixley | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $684 | $1,298 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $737 | $1,379 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $864 | $1,721 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $1,308 | $2,229 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$623 | +$931 | +$606 |
Rent in Pixley runs $1,308 a month at the median, utilities included, below the U.S. median of $1,571. Rents are up $623 a month from 2006–10, a 91% jump, faster than rents rose nationally. The typical renter here spends 28.1% of household income on rent, just under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent, and a smaller share than renters pay nationally. Of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people, only 64 have lower rents.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Pixley
Bachelor's degrees in Pixley
| Period | Pixley | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 3.2% | 29.1% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 3.3% | 30.1% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 4.3% | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 6.3% | 36.3% | 35.6% |
| Change | +3.2 pts | +7.1 pts | +7.2 pts |
Fewer adults in Pixley have a four-year degree than in the country as a whole: 6.3%, against 35.6% nationally. Since 2006–10, the share with a degree has risen 3.2 points, mirroring the country. Only 15 of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people have a lower share of college graduates.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Pixley
| Period | Pixley | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 38.2% | 79.9% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 39.6% | 80.7% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 38.7% | 82.6% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 48.2% | 84.2% | 89.3% |
| Change | +10.0 pts | +4.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
Just over half of adults in Pixley never finished high school, well above the national share: only 48.2% have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3% nationally. Since 2006–10, the share with a diploma has risen 10.0 points, in line with the national trend. Only seven of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people have a lower share of high school graduates.
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Pixley
| Period | Pixley | California | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 19.9% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 18.3% | 11.3% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 13.9% | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 11.0% | 6.6% | 5.4% |
| Change | −8.8 pts | −2.6 pts | −2.7 pts |
Finding work has been harder in Pixley: 11.0% of the labor force was out of work and looking, well above the national rate of 5.4%. Only 49 of the 689 California cities with 5,000+ people have higher unemployment. Unemployment is down 8.8 points from 2006–10, a much bigger shift than nationally.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Pixley compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pixley | 4.21 | 23.5 | 25.7% | 55.5% | 9.6% | 1977 | $1,308 | 6.3% | 48.2% | 11.0% |
| Earlimart | 4.04 | 27.7 | 23.4% | 49.1% | 9.1% | 1982 | $973 | 5.3% | 48.2% | 22.7% |
| Tipton | 3.80 | 29.2 | 16.5% | 74.3% | 10.2% | 1976 | $1,338 | 7.2% | 45.3% | 9.3% |
| Nanceville | 3.73 | 32.1 | 15.0% | 34.2% | 6.5% | 1978 | $1,163 | 7.0% | 64.3% | 8.6% |
| Alpaugh | 3.87 | 25.0 | 22.4% | 59.8% | 15.9% | 1973 | $1,022 | 4.4% | 54.0% | 17.8% |
| Terra Bella | 3.87 | 34.1 | 20.3% | 33.1% | 8.7% | 1982 | $1,146 | 6.9% | 68.7% | 15.6% |
| Ducor | 3.50 | 34.7 | 17.8% | 22.8% | 10.7% | 1978 | $1,060 | 9.5% | 63.7% | 7.0% |
| Porterville | 3.36 | 32.0 | 21.3% | 44.4% | 7.1% | 1978 | $1,254 | 12.9% | 66.5% | 10.1% |
| Corcoran | 3.48 | 33.9 | 27.8% | 49.0% | 8.1% | 1981 | $1,271 | 5.4% | 65.7% | 10.0% |
| Woodville | 3.64 | 29.6 | 26.8% | 39.5% | 13.6% | 1983 | $916 | 11.9% | 68.0% | 11.5% |
| East Porterville | 3.14 | 33.0 | 17.0% | 45.7% | 11.4% | 1978 | $1,138 | 15.6% | 66.8% | 9.4% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Comanche, TX · Collinsville, AL · Colona, IL · Columbia, CT · Columbiaville, MI · Columbus Grove, OH · Columbus, NC · Columbus, TX · Columbus, WI · Collins, MS
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Pixley. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.