Port Gardner, Everett, WA Demographics

Population 10,213 · Census ACS 2020–24

Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.

Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Port Gardner, Everett, WA map of median age by neighborhood
Click the map to explore
Younger residents Older residents
Colorblind friendly off

More maps of Port Gardner: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet

Jump to median age ↓︎

Population and households in Port Gardner

Household size in Port Gardner

Household size, people per household
PeriodPort GardnerEverettSeattle areaWashingtonU.S.
2006–101.902.472.522.562.68
2010–142.002.562.592.622.73
2015–191.942.512.622.622.71
2020–241.992.552.602.612.65
Change+0.09+0.08+0.09+0.05−0.03
Show on the map ↑︎

Households in Port Gardner are small: just 1.99 people on average, compared with 2.65 nationally. That is typical of places where many people live alone or as couples, and fewer have children at home. Household size has climbed from 1.90 in 2006–10, even as the national average fell. Only one other Everett neighborhood has smaller households.

Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).

Median age in Port Gardner

Median age, years
PeriodPort GardnerEverettSeattle areaWashingtonU.S.
2006–1041.334.737.538.037.7
2010–1439.835.438.138.738.6
2015–1942.337.238.539.339.6
2020–2439.737.738.839.640.1
Change−1.6+3.0+1.3+1.6+2.3
Show on the map ↑︎

Half of the people in Port Gardner are younger than 39.7 and half are older, close to the national median of 40.1. The population here is older than in Everett overall, where the median age is 37.7. Since 2006–10, the median age has dropped from 41.3, even as the national median rose.

Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).

Single-parent households in Port Gardner

Single-parent households, % of households
PeriodPort GardnerEverettSeattle areaWashingtonU.S.
2006–109.4%14.6%10.3%10.9%12.3%
2010–149.9%12.3%10.0%10.6%12.3%
2015–198.7%12.1%9.2%10.1%11.6%
2020–248.9%10.1%9.1%10.1%11.6%
Change−0.5 pts−4.5 pts−1.2 pts−0.8 pts−0.6 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Single-parent households are less common in Port Gardner than nationally: 8.9%, against 11.6%. The single-parent share is down 0.5 points from 2006–10, in line with the national trend.

Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).

Housing in Port Gardner

Renters in Port Gardner

Renters, % of occupied homes
PeriodPort GardnerEverettSeattle areaWashingtonU.S.
2006–1066.7%50.8%37.7%35.2%33.3%
2010–1467.5%52.3%40.0%37.3%35.6%
2015–1968.3%50.8%39.9%37.0%36.0%
2020–2461.8%48.6%40.0%36.2%34.8%
Change−4.8 pts−2.2 pts+2.3 pts+1.0 pts+1.5 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Renters far outnumber owners in Port Gardner: 61.8% of households rent their homes, against 34.8% nationally. Among homeowners, 23.9% have no mortgage at all, well below the national share of 39.8%. Renting is most common in the north and least common in the southwest. The renter share is down 4.8 points from 2006–10, even as the national share rose.

Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).

Vacant homes in Port Gardner

Vacant homes, % of all homes
PeriodPort GardnerEverettSeattle areaWashingtonU.S.
2006–106.2%8.0%7.9%9.2%11.4%
2010–149.6%8.3%7.8%9.2%11.4%
2015–1910.7%6.5%6.8%8.2%11.1%
2020–248.8%6.9%6.6%7.6%9.6%
Change+2.6 pts−1.1 pts−1.3 pts−1.6 pts−1.8 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Vacancy in Port Gardner is close to the national rate: 8.8% of homes are empty, against 9.6%. The rate is higher than in Everett as a whole (6.9%). Vacancy has risen 2.6 points since 2006–10, even as the national rate fell.

Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).

Age of homes in Port Gardner

Age of homes, median year built
PeriodPort GardnerEverettSeattle areaWashingtonU.S.
2006–1019571975197719771974
2010–1419571976197819791975
2015–1919651979198019801977
2020–2419761980198319841980
Change+19+5+7+6+6
Show on the map ↑︎

Homes in Port Gardner are about the same age as the nation's housing: the median home was built in 1976, versus 1980 nationally. Homes here are older than in Everett overall, where the median home dates to 1980. The median year built has moved up from 1957 in 2006–10, a sign of steady new building. The newest homes are mostly in the north, the oldest in the west.

Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).

Rent in Port Gardner

Rent, per month
PeriodPort GardnerEverettSeattle areaWashingtonU.S.
2006–10$787$1,002$1,162$1,018$965
2010–14$828$1,095$1,284$1,127$1,040
2015–19$1,076$1,386$1,644$1,390$1,213
2020–24$1,527$1,849$2,193$1,875$1,571
Change+$739+$847+$1,031+$858+$606
Show on the map ↑︎

Rent in Port Gardner runs $1,527 a month at the median, utilities included, close to the U.S. median of $1,571. Rents here are lower than in Everett as a whole ($1,849). Rent has climbed $739 a month since 2006–10, up 94%, faster than rents rose nationally. Rent takes 32.1% of the typical renter's income, just over the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.

Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).

Education in Port Gardner

Bachelor's degrees in Port Gardner

Bachelor's degrees, % of adults 25+
PeriodPort GardnerEverettSeattle areaWashingtonU.S.
2006–1022.4%21.0%36.7%31.0%28.4%
2010–1421.0%22.2%38.0%32.1%29.6%
2015–1924.9%25.0%42.3%35.5%32.1%
2020–2429.4%29.2%46.3%38.8%35.6%
Change+7.0 pts+8.2 pts+9.6 pts+7.8 pts+7.2 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

College degrees are a little less common in Port Gardner than nationally: 29.4% of adults 25 and older have a bachelor's or higher, against 35.6%. Since 2006–10, the share with a degree has risen 7.0 points, mirroring the country. College graduates are most concentrated in the west and least in the south.

Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

High school graduates in Port Gardner

High school graduates, % of adults 25+
PeriodPort GardnerEverettSeattle areaWashingtonU.S.
2006–1087.1%85.6%91.3%89.5%84.9%
2010–1485.5%87.3%91.6%90.0%86.1%
2015–1989.5%87.9%92.5%91.0%87.7%
2020–2494.7%89.7%93.1%91.9%89.3%
Change+7.6 pts+4.0 pts+1.8 pts+2.4 pts+4.3 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

High school completion is high in Port Gardner: 94.7% of adults 25 and older have a diploma or equivalent, well above the national rate of 89.3%. The share with a diploma is up 7.6 points from 2006–10, mirroring the country. Only two of Everett's 17 neighborhoods have a higher share of high school graduates.

High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).

Jobs in Port Gardner

Unemployment, % of the labor force
PeriodPort GardnerEverettSeattle areaWashingtonU.S.
2006–1012.6%9.0%6.9%7.6%8.1%
2010–1415.9%11.1%8.3%8.9%9.4%
2015–198.3%5.3%4.5%5.1%5.6%
2020–247.0%5.7%5.0%5.1%5.4%
Change−5.6 pts−3.3 pts−2.0 pts−2.5 pts−2.7 pts
Show on the map ↑︎

Jobs have been harder to find in Port Gardner than nationally: unemployment was 7.0%, against 5.4%. Unemployment has fallen 5.6 points since 2006–10, in line with the national trend. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.

Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).

Port Gardner compared with nearby neighborhoods

NeighborhoodHousehold sizeMedian ageSingle parentsRentersVacant homesMedian year builtMedian rentBachelor's degreeHigh school diplomaUnemployment
Port Gardner1.9939.78.9%61.8%8.8%1976$1,52729.4%94.7%7.0%
Bayside1.9239.72.7%62.9%8.4%1960$1,68533.2%92.3%7.0%
Riverside-Everett2.4740.56.5%34.1%7.7%1949$1,54526.7%94.4%5.1%
South Forest Park2.2148.88.0%33.7%12.1%1962$1,81533.4%86.7%9.3%
Glacier View2.1043.36.8%49.4%10.8%1967$1,88526.7%89.9%3.1%
Northwest Everett2.4143.03.8%27.7%10.1%1941$1,84347.7%94.3%4.1%
View Ridge-Madison2.8141.36.5%27.2%7.0%1972$1,56631.4%88.2%7.9%
Delta2.6432.523.9%66.0%9.6%1974$1,47315.5%79.7%6.5%
Harborview-Seahurst-Glenhaven2.9044.52.5%10.5%7.8%1983$1,79541.7%94.9%5.9%
Evergreen2.9939.213.0%29.0%13.4%1980$1,91224.3%89.4%4.2%
Boulevard Bluffs2.3546.14.5%32.4%4.9%1987$2,32654.0%98.3%2.5%

All figures 2020–24.

Neighborhoods with similar populations: King, Ann Arbor, MI · Wessex Square, Charlotte, NC · Turner, Kansas City, KS · Thomasville, Atlanta, GA · State College Area, Long Beach, CA · Sorrento Valley, San Diego, CA · Song, Irving, TX · Ruby Hill, Denver, CO · Riviera, Coral Gables, FL · Northland Lyceum, Rochester, NY

About these numbers

Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Port Gardner. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.

No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.