Population 1,984 · Census ACS 2020–24
Choose a measure to map it.Tap a measure to map it. Swipe the row for more. Arrows show the change since 2006–10.
Median age by neighborhoodHistory and comparison ↓︎
Younger residents
Older residents
Colorblind friendly
off
More maps of Porter: Best Neighborhoods · Walk Grade · Household income · Home prices · Race · Politics · Traffic noise · Internet
Population and households in Porter
Household size in Porter
| Period | Porter | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 2.60 | 2.56 | 2.55 | 2.68 |
| 2010–14 | 2.67 | 2.60 | 2.60 | 2.73 |
| 2015–19 | 2.73 | 2.60 | 2.63 | 2.71 |
| 2020–24 | 2.47 | 2.59 | 2.58 | 2.65 |
| Change | −0.13 | +0.03 | +0.03 | −0.03 |
Households in Porter run small, averaging 2.47 people against 2.65 nationally, which usually means more singles and couples and fewer children. Household size has dropped from 2.60 in 2006–10, but in a place this small, much of that may be survey noise rather than real change.
Household size: the average number of people living in each occupied home. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25010).
Median age in Porter
| Period | Porter | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 41.8 | 37.2 | 37.4 | 37.7 |
| 2010–14 | 39.2 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 38.6 |
| 2015–19 | 40.8 | 37.8 | 37.9 | 39.6 |
| 2020–24 | 43.7 | 38.0 | 38.0 | 40.1 |
| Change | +1.9 | +0.8 | +0.6 | +2.3 |
The median resident of Porter is 43.7 years old, older than the national median of 40.1.
Median age: the age that splits residents into two equal halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B01002).
Single-parent households in Porter
| Period | Porter | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 6.8% | 11.7% | 11.9% | 12.3% |
| 2010–14 | 8.8% | 12.5% | 12.1% | 12.3% |
| 2015–19 | 9.9% | 12.2% | 12.1% | 11.6% |
| 2020–24 | 9.0% | 11.6% | 12.0% | 11.6% |
| Change | +2.2 pts | −0.1 pts | +0.1 pts | −0.6 pts |
Single-parent households are less common in Porter than nationally: 9.0%, against 11.6%.
Single-parent households: households where one adult with no spouse present lives with children under 18. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B11003).
Housing in Porter
Renters in Porter
| Period | Porter | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 15.2% | 32.5% | 31.8% | 33.3% |
| 2010–14 | 17.9% | 33.8% | 33.5% | 35.6% |
| 2015–19 | 22.0% | 35.2% | 34.4% | 36.0% |
| 2020–24 | 20.1% | 34.5% | 34.2% | 34.8% |
| Change | +4.9 pts | +2.1 pts | +2.4 pts | +1.5 pts |
Porter is largely a place of homeowners: only 20.1% of households rent, far below the national share of 34.8%. Owner-heavy areas like this tend to see less turnover. About half of owners (51.5%) have paid off their mortgages, well above the national share of 39.8%.
Renters: occupied homes that are rented rather than owned. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25003).
Vacant homes in Porter
| Period | Porter | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 17.9% | 10.1% | 12.8% | 11.4% |
| 2010–14 | 11.2% | 10.3% | 12.7% | 11.4% |
| 2015–19 | 12.9% | 10.6% | 13.5% | 11.1% |
| 2020–24 | 11.8% | 8.5% | 11.3% | 9.6% |
| Change | −6.1 pts | −1.7 pts | −1.5 pts | −1.8 pts |
A few more homes sit empty in Porter than nationally: 11.8%, against 9.6%. The count includes vacation homes and homes between owners or tenants, not just abandoned ones.
Vacant homes: homes with no one living in them, including vacation homes and homes for sale or rent. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25002).
Age of homes in Porter
| Period | Porter | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 1980 | 1978 | 1976 | 1974 |
| 2010–14 | 1982 | 1979 | 1977 | 1975 |
| 2015–19 | 1991 | 1980 | 1979 | 1977 |
| 2020–24 | 1990 | 1983 | 1982 | 1980 |
| Change | +10 | +6 | +7 | +6 |
Much of the housing in Porter is relatively new: half of its homes were built after 1990, compared with 1980 for the U.S. as a whole.
Age of homes: the year that splits the housing stock into older and newer halves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25035).
Rent in Porter
| Period | Porter | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | $634 | $794 | $716 | $965 |
| 2010–14 | $680 | $872 | $805 | $1,040 |
| 2015–19 | $810 | $979 | $897 | $1,213 |
| 2020–24 | $740 | $1,219 | $1,127 | $1,571 |
| Change | +$105 | +$425 | +$411 | +$606 |
The median renter in Porter pays $740 a month for rent and utilities, well below the national median of $1,571. Rent takes 23.3% of the typical renter's income, comfortably under the 30% mark often used to define affordable rent.
Rent: monthly rent plus the utilities renters pay themselves. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B25064).
Education in Porter
Bachelor's degrees in Porter
| Period | Porter | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 17.9% | 25.5% | 24.2% | 28.4% |
| 2010–14 | 15.3% | 26.2% | 24.9% | 29.6% |
| 2015–19 | 15.4% | 27.7% | 26.1% | 32.1% |
| 2020–24 | 18.5% | 30.3% | 28.9% | 35.6% |
| Change | +0.6 pts | +4.8 pts | +4.7 pts | +7.2 pts |
College degrees are relatively uncommon in Porter: 18.5% of adults 25 and older hold a bachelor's or higher, well below the national share of 35.6%.
Bachelor's degrees: adults 25 and older with a bachelor's degree or higher. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
High school graduates in Porter
| Period | Porter | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 82.7% | 87.7% | 86.0% | 84.9% |
| 2010–14 | 84.0% | 88.4% | 87.0% | 86.1% |
| 2015–19 | 87.5% | 89.3% | 88.1% | 87.7% |
| 2020–24 | 88.5% | 90.1% | 89.3% | 89.3% |
| Change | +5.8 pts | +2.4 pts | +3.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
High school completion in Porter is close to the national rate: 88.5% of adults have a diploma or equivalent, against 89.3%. The rate is lower than in the wider Tulsa area (90.1%).
High school graduates: adults 25 and older with a high school diploma, GED or more. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B15003).
Jobs in Porter
| Period | Porter | Tulsa area | Oklahoma | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006–10 | 4.7% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 8.1% |
| 2010–14 | 10.6% | 7.1% | 6.8% | 9.4% |
| 2015–19 | 6.7% | 5.5% | 5.2% | 5.6% |
| 2020–24 | 6.8% | 5.2% | 5.0% | 5.4% |
| Change | +2.1 pts | −0.9 pts | −1.1 pts | −2.7 pts |
Jobs have been harder to find in Porter than nationally: unemployment was 6.8%, against 5.4%. Each figure pools five years of surveys (2020–24), so it describes that whole stretch rather than today's job market.
Unemployment: people looking for work as a share of everyone working or looking. Source: BestNeighborhood calculations from U.S. Census Bureau ACS 5-year block-group estimates (table B23025).
Porter compared with nearby cities
| City | Household size | Median age | Single parents | Renters | Vacant homes | Median year built | Median rent | Bachelor's degree | High school diploma | Unemployment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porter | 2.47 | 43.7 | 9.0% | 20.1% | 11.8% | 1990 | $740 | 18.5% | 88.5% | 6.8% |
| Redbird | 2.60 | 42.2 | 9.4% | 12.1% | 7.0% | 1991 | $803 | 25.1% | 93.1% | 4.9% |
| Tullahassee | 2.60 | 42.5 | 5.7% | 18.7% | 5.0% | 1997 | $892 | 25.5% | 92.7% | 4.3% |
| Taft | 2.11 | 40.2 | 1.0% | 13.1% | 20.8% | 2007 | $877 | 4.0% | 82.6% | 4.1% |
| Haskell | 2.46 | 42.4 | 6.4% | 15.8% | 9.7% | 1990 | $849 | 14.3% | 87.7% | 4.2% |
| Wagoner | 2.55 | 43.7 | 10.4% | 29.5% | 16.9% | 1978 | $808 | 18.1% | 87.4% | 4.7% |
| Coweta | 2.78 | 38.1 | 11.4% | 21.9% | 6.0% | 1998 | $1,010 | 27.9% | 93.2% | 4.1% |
| Okay | 2.76 | 41.3 | 15.2% | 12.5% | 15.4% | 1989 | $965 | 15.9% | 89.2% | 4.9% |
| Stonebluff | 2.65 | 44.4 | 4.7% | 5.2% | 8.0% | 2000 | $850 | 26.8% | 94.9% | 3.3% |
| Muskogee | 2.46 | 38.1 | 17.2% | 40.1% | 12.5% | 1972 | $899 | 19.3% | 87.9% | 6.3% |
| Leonard | 2.74 | 41.3 | 9.1% | 16.9% | 5.7% | 1988 | $1,754 | 34.1% | 96.0% | 3.6% |
All figures 2020–24.
Cities with similar populations: Yoncalla, OR · Arlington, NE · Valley Falls, KS · Vanderbilt, MI · Waldo, OH · Waverly, WV · Whitewood, SD · Wilton, AL · Withee, WI · Garrett Park, MD
About these numbers
Every figure on this page is a BestNeighborhood calculation from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS), built up from the Census block groups that make up Porter. Each ACS 5-year release pools five years of responses; this page shows the last 15 releases, 2006–10 through 2020–24. Neighboring releases share four of their five years, so they move gradually and small changes between them are within the survey's margin of error; in small places the lines can jump from one release to the next for the same reason. The maps show the same measures for each neighborhood, ranked against the whole country.
No other site shows detail at this level for free. We are able to keep this site free by receiving a small commission from the referring links on this page. Please share or cite this page if you aren’t able to otherwise support our work.